Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hey You, You Don't Know Quarterbacking


fieryprophet
 Share

Recommended Posts

So what about Bryce?

I started off as a major doubter, but came around to believing in him by the end of last season.

Then this season started, and oy... 😖

Buuuut now things are picking up again, so... 🤔

I'm waiting to see how the rest of the season plays out at this point, but even the doubter in me has to admit things are looking up.

The one firm conclusion I have come to this season isn't so much about Young, but Canales. From what I've seen over the past two years, I think his offseason preparation program sucks. The team comes into the season looking shoddy and unprepared...

But then things pick up a few weeks in 😕

Maybe what he needs is a more experienced (and successful) past head coach on staff or consulting who can help him build a more effective offseason program combination of camp, OTAs, etc so we can leave the slow starts behind.

Here's hoping...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, CRA said:

I have never seen anyone dig into the claim Bryce Young LITERALLY can't throw the ball 20 yards. I don't think acting like THAT is an actual position here, is a good position to argue from. 

 

15 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

Ok, I did, and it happened, and that’s one of many ridiculous positions that have made it difficult to have real discussions here. Again, that was a point among several that I pointed out, and there are more that I didn’t point out. You are latching onto it because it’s ridiculous. And that was also the point. 

This was a week ago lol

On 10/7/2025 at 7:18 AM, CRA said:

Bryce can’t play beyond 20 yards.  We don’t need to keep trying ton solve a riddle that has been answered.   Even in the 10-20 yard range Bryce largely just plays the game to the sideline/out.   

 

On 10/7/2025 at 7:35 AM, CRA said:

He can’t.  Not by NFL standards.  More than enough evidence at this stage to make that determination.  For even a chance at one Bryce has to get a perfect look and that’s not NFL football.   His weak arm gets nerfed too much when you get him off an ideal setup. 

Bryce’s ball placement and accuracy are horrible downfield.  That applied at Bama.  Bama WRs just had room to adjust.  Bryce defenders just repeat this lie about his Bama deep ball.  NFL balls have to be well placed to dudes only NFL open.  Bryce leads the NFL in bad throw % since arriving.  His accuracy and balls are garbage vs his peers. 

Countless plays for years where dudes are NFL open downfield and Bryce just lets the DB have just as good as a shot at it or takes the WR out of bounds.  It’s not a debate. 

Dudes flat out open this year on repeat.  He can’t make the throws.  So the talk about not having speed is auto debunked and a distraction.  Open is open and Bryce has gotten the looks 

 

 

ogosuyfg2ybf1.gif.456eff3aab854c8cd2a4844a64a61f24.gif

 

 

Edited by dep
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Disagree. I thought it was good, especially the last two paragraphs.

Quote

The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team.

 

If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.

This qualifies as analysis??? This is what impressed you??

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, dep said:

 

This was a week ago lol

 

 

ogosuyfg2ybf1.gif.456eff3aab854c8cd2a4844a64a61f24.gif

 

 

Gymnastics Fail GIFs - Find & Share on GIPHY

LMAO.... criticizing Bryce for his inability play the game beyond 20 yards....is not arguing he literally can't throw the ball 20 yards. 

you can also check my posts where I have detailed his 20+ yard throws in 2024 and in 2025 and his success rate doing.   Looking at his 20+ yard throws (which clearly isn't denying the literal ability to do it), is how the argument he is dogwater and can't play beyond 20 yards is crafted. 

 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Gymnastics Fail GIFs - Find & Share on GIPHY

LMAO.... criticizing Bryce for inability play the game beyond 20 yards....is not arguing he literally can't throw the ball 20 yards. 

you can also check my posts where I have detailed his 20+ yard throws in 2024 and in 2025 and his success rate doing.   Looking at his 20+ yard throws (which clearly isn't denying the literal ability to do it), is how the argument he is dogwater and can't play beyond 20 yards of crafted. 

 

Oh like physically throw it... the average man can throw a football 20 yards who would argue against that lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

This qualifies as analysis??? This is what impressed you??

Nothing against the OP because there's some nice intent and perspective to the post (I suppose) 

Quote
Feature  DESCRIPTOR 1 DESCRIPTOR 2
Foundation Mostly opinion and preconceived notions Evidence and objective examination
Purpose To declare conclusive statements and lecture To understand and explain
Direction One-way communication at the crowd, not the subject being analyzed; asserting Two-way exploration; inquiry into the why and how
Tone Pompous, dogmatic, and/or condescending Objective, interpretive, and methodical
Process Does not involve rigorous inquiry.  Assertion of intellectual basis without process. Systematically breaks down a subject from multiple perspectives
Outcome Unqualified or unsupported declarations Nuanced conclusions supported by evidence

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Nothing against the OP because there's some nice intent and perspective to the post (I suppose) 

 

That's what I mean. If you claim to possess some super knowledge about the QB position from a previous non-football but football related job, wouldn't you want to expound upon that to support this "everyone doesn't know anything about being a QB" thesis?

The rest is just summed up by stating that there are a lot of variables to a QB being successful. Yeah....I mean that isn't earth shattering. 

While there is certainly a lot of luck involved in all manners of success, consistent success with the variables around you also changing on a regular basis is usually fairly conclusive. 

Is Trent Dilfer the same as Tom Brady? Is Nick Foles the same as Patrick Mahomes?

I supposed based on the OP's arguments, they are. That's not really the way it turned out, however. 

The NFL isn't unlike most other jobs or even other sports. The cream typically does rise to the top on a more consistent basis. Is it accidental that premier poker players seem to win or perform very well on a consistent basis, give that any individual hand is largely luck?

 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, CRA said:

Gymnastics Fail GIFs - Find & Share on GIPHY

LMAO.... criticizing Bryce for his inability play the game beyond 20 yards....is not arguing he literally can't throw the ball 20 yards. 

you can also check my posts where I have detailed his 20+ yard throws in 2024 and in 2025 and his success rate doing.   Looking at his 20+ yard throws (which clearly isn't denying the literal ability to do it), is how the argument he is dogwater and can't play beyond 20 yards is crafted. 

 

It's not even a particularly nuanced opinion, yet it seems out of reach for so many.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, dep said:

 

This was a week ago lol

 

 

ogosuyfg2ybf1.gif.456eff3aab854c8cd2a4844a64a61f24.gif

 

 

We have a language barrier here.

 CRA saying he can’t play beyond 20 yards is NOT saying he can’t throw the ball 20 yards. 
 

That ain’t the flex you think it is. 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

image.gif.e3cce61e1ddb548ab3e83af5ccf84f4f.gif

Here is another: You are being intentionally obtuse with this 20 yard BS and don’t like being called on it. 

PS it wasn’t intended as a burn, it was more of an assessment of reality. And what do you know, here we are talking. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...