Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes vs Aves 9pm


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Had no business winning that game. TY Freddie 

I disagree. We were down 3 defensemen and 2 forwards. We worked hard and the refs were doing everything possible to make this a game. If we were full strength we win that game by 2 goals. Also, whoever is advising Rod from the truck needs to do a better job. Their second goal, was not a goal.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, philit99 said:

I disagree. We were down 3 defensemen and 2 forwards. We worked hard and the refs were doing everything possible to make this a game. If we were full strength we win that game by 2 goals. Also, whoever is advising Rod from the truck needs to do a better job. Their second goal, was not a goal.

I think he just means down slavin ghost and miller and losing carrier and Robinson Mia game. Having to play 3 rookies while the forwards are double shifting and playing sell out defense.   I watched a team with heart absolutely sucking wind and out of gas. But they hung on.  Full roster, yea we win that by 2-3. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, philit99 said:

I disagree. We were down 3 defensemen and 2 forwards. We worked hard and the refs were doing everything possible to make this a game. If we were full strength we win that game by 2 goals. Also, whoever is advising Rod from the truck needs to do a better job. Their second goal, was not a goal.

We challenged the goal and lost didn’t we?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, the goal that should not have been a goal....

https://www.nhl.com/news/carolina-hurricanes-colorado-avalanche-coach-challenge-x1595

Challenge Initiated By: Carolina

Type of Challenge: Missed Game Stoppage Event – High-Sticking the Puck

Result: Original call confirmed – Goal Colorado

Explanation: The Situation Room supported the Referee’s call on the ice that Parker Kelly’s stick was not above the normal height of his shoulders when he contacted the puck at 15:31 of the second period (4:29 elapsed time) – 17 seconds prior to his goal. The decision was made in accordance with Rule 80.1.

Penalty: 2:00 minor penalty: Delay of Game – Unsuccessful Challenge

------------------------------------------------------------

How the challenge was interpreted as a high stick challenge is beyond me. What I cannot find is what/how RBA challenged the goal and how it was reviewed as a high stick goal when Stevie Wonder could see the hand extending off Kelly's stick, essentially grabbing at the puck and it went by Freddie. 

But the note says, "...17 seconds prior to his goal." So I have no clue that they even looked at the hand goal. 

Edited by Anybodyhome
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...