Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Damning indictment of Bryce Young


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

Summation.  

1. What do the Panthers miss with Young out ?   For a number 1 draft pick and supposedly a franchise qb.,if he is missed, can the areas be quantified ? 

2  Vegas set the line of Bills -7   That  line was set before the panthers jets game finished and Bryce was hurt   The line didn’t move  once Vegas knew  he was out.   Vegas views the panthers minimally different with Bryce as without him 

 

Edited by raleigh-panther
Spelling
  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, OneBadCat said:

I think Bryce does have a clutch factor to him. If he could just drop a few bombs a game he’d be fine. 

He does have a little clutch but so much inconsistency. And against bad teams still. 

I want a break from watching him yes but at the same time I know he needs to play because we are getting to the the challenging part of the schedule and the biggest tests are in front not behind. 
We need to see what he can really do.

We very much need to see  what he can do against a good defense. In non garbage time 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the Fantasy Football XM channel today, they were talking about injuries for each game and when they go to ours they asked how Bryce being out and having Dalton would affect the rest of our offensive players for fantasy.

Each one of them said that it was probably better for our WRs that it would be Dalton instead of Bryce.

I know fantasy isn't the same as real life football, but it's still a bad look when they all think our pass catchers are better off with Dalton than Bryce back there.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

On the Fantasy Football XM channel today, they were talking about injuries for each game and when they go to ours they asked how Bryce being out and having Dalton would affect the rest of our offensive players for fantasy.

Each one of them said that it was probably better for our WRs that it would be Dalton instead of Bryce.

I know fantasy isn't the same as real life football, but it's still a bad look when they all think our pass catchers are better off with Dalton than Bryce back there.

That is probably an area where it aligns with real life though. Pretty general assessment. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, NAS said:

I was told the Bryce stans were the problem yet almost every post or topic turns into Bryce bashing unprovoked.  Pathetic 

Unprovoked is a word choice that’s for sure. If he starts playing well enough then criticism might be unprovoked. 
I don’t know what to say to this. People call it like they see it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, strato said:

Unprovoked is a word choice that’s for sure. If he starts playing well enough then criticism might be unprovoked. 
I don’t know what to say to this. People call it like they see it. 

Totally unserious - you’re just turning into trolls at this point 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Great point.    I would lke to add that there is another QB on the roster who was terrible over the middle--Kenny Pickett.  
    • I don't think this is the year for Carolina, unfortunately.  I think they will have to make a decision on the QB position-all we know is that Bryce has year 5, but a long term deal has not been signed--yet--and they would be smart to take a "wait and see" approach.  I have not kept up, and I see a path to upside for Bryce, but I do not think we have aggressively pursued a QB when our QB was mediocre to worse than mediocre.  yes, his numbers are improving--but he has adapted by eliminating what he does poorly and not improving on what he does poorly.  Just my take and I have no data to support this view.   Basically, we go as Bryce goes, so the approach is not to bring in a QB to have him compete until we find one, but it is to make Bryce as good as he can be--is that good enough? Season ticket holders buy the hope of winning rings, not winning 8 games. Last year, Bryce had a resurgence.  Take away TMac and Rico Dowdle.  How good was he?  I still have hope.  Not a hater of plan A, but a hater because we have no plan B.
    • Yeah man, I've been here for a very very long time. Couldn't even begin to tell you what year. Maybe 2004 or 5? I've never really been super active, just enjoy reading everyone's opinions and discussions. I'll chime in from time to time. I have had a few different accounts over the years. It's always been a fun place for me to check in on my favorite team. Hopefully we can keep the place running for a long while still. I also would like to recommend bringing back the Lovely Ladies page!
×
×
  • Create New...