Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

After we release Dalton tomorrow, who do we sign?


sonburst4
 Share

Recommended Posts

He will retire at the end of the season. Canales already said in the press conference that he will continue being the back up. 
 

The real question will be who do they get in the offseason to either A) provide competition in QB room or B) have a competent back up for situations like this. 
 

The problem is can you really have B without A? 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ProcessBlue2 said:

He will retire at the end of the season. Canales already said in the press conference that he will continue being the back up. 
 

The real question will be who do they get in the offseason to either A) provide competition in QB room or B) have a competent back up for situations like this. 
 

The problem is can you really have B without A? 

No you cannot have one without the other. I just cannot see the FO looking at the results they see on the field every Sunday and say they are set at the qb position. There is NO WAY they could not see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

No you cannot have one without the other. I just cannot see the FO looking at the results they see on the field every Sunday and say they are set at the qb position. There is NO WAY they could not see it.

That’s what I was getting at. If they are going to have a real back-up QB it’s going to have to be somebody that can drive competition, which has ultimately been a cardinal sin here since Bryce was drafted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ProcessBlue2 said:

That’s what I was getting at. If they are going to have a real back-up QB it’s going to have to be somebody that can drive competition, which has ultimately been a cardinal sin here since Bryce was drafted. 

We have a backup starting already and it's not Dalton. What we don't have is a future starter. Forgot a franchise qb I would settle for a really good starter for the time being. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

We have a backup starting already and it's not Dalton. What we don't have is a future starter. Forgot a franchise qb I would settle for a really good starter for the time being. 

Now are you sure we just don’t  have enough talent around him? (Sarcasm)

Think Tim Robinson GIF by NETFLIX

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

No you cannot have one without the other. I just cannot see the FO looking at the results they see on the field every Sunday and say they are set at the qb position. There is NO WAY they could not see it.

The fear is that they see it, and have seen it but are overruled. I think they should have seen it like, off the bat. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • poo has gone insane. NCAAF is badly broken. 
    • he's eligible to return next week. canales going to put him right back into the starting lineup https://x.com/mike_e_kaye/status/1982531852922675205
    • I mean, that sounds good. I will say that I kind of cringe when people say we overpaid for for an O-line because if you want the best players, or even quality players on the O-line, you're going to have to pay. They were proven players, one arguably the best at his position in football, so you're going to back up the Brinks truck. I don't see it as overpaying as much as I see it shifting your priorities in light of your situation and market conditions.  Now with an RB, those generally are easier to get and easier to replace, especially if you have a good O-line. We could've let Chuba walk and still kept rolling a lot easier than continuing to roll the dice on backups starting on the O-line. I can't even remember who was available, but I'd bet that there was someone available who could replace Chuba's production. That being said, we've been told in this thread that Chuba's contract was structured in a way that facilitates minimal pain if we decide to move on from him. If that's so, then it was smart and someone in the FO had a little foresight (and probably understands the PR side of things, as well as the pure numbers side). 
×
×
  • Create New...