Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This Bryce Guy (General BY Discussion)


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

I want a Cam at QB but I'd settle for someone that isn't statistically in the bottom third of everything.

Edit: alright id not really settle until we had an elite player at that position haha

Yeah we all want to have the best. You are honest about it. 
Cam had his faults but man did he have the tools covered. 
 

I would happily settle for a guy in the Jake mold for a few seasons. He had NFL level tools. Not top level but we weren’t super constrained by his limitations and he made his teammates better and they also made him better. We had a fighting chance with him. 
 

Matching his will to win would be harder than matching his tools. But we don’t have to have the best for things to potentially be a lot better. IMO anyway. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, strato said:

Yeah we all want to have the best. You are honest about it. 
Cam had his faults but man did he have the tools covered. 
 

I would happily settle for a guy in the Jake mold for a few seasons. He had NFL level tools. Not top level but we weren’t super constrained by his limitations and he made his teammates better and they also made him better. We had a fighting chance with him. 
 

Matching his will to win would be harder than matching his tools. But we don’t have to have the best for things to potentially be a lot better. IMO anyway. 

I think a player like Jake at least allows you to build a team around him without it feeling like you are ignoring the best position on the field entirely. And he had a couple of years in the top third of the league IMO and many others where you knew he was a threat and no stage was too big.

We just desperately need new blood in the QB room.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

He will be 36 next year with 2 years on his deal.  26 is manageable but in 2027 it jumps to 40 million per.  I dont see how that is anywhere close to a solution.

There's speculation he'll be on his way out in LV, which could enable a restructuring of contract. But I don't actually want Geno at all.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

There's speculation he'll be on his way out in LV, which could enable a restructuring of contract. But I don't actually want Geno at all.

I am not sure why he would take less than he is owed just to get out though and again it doesnt solve any problem at all other then getting off of bryce.   I am not sure who the answer is but I know its not him at 36 years old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, electro's horse said:

IMG_9139.png

IMG_9140.png

Wait till Cam Ward gets some help. His flashes are special 

 

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I am not sure why he would take less than he is owed just to get out though and again it doesnt solve any problem at all other then getting off of bryce.   I am not sure who the answer is but I know it’s not him at 36 years old.

The Raiders will cut Geno this offseason. Signing Geno to start would be like signing Bridgewater a few years ago

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oddly feeling really good about tonight. fug the heat
    • Here are my takeaways from the conference (IMO): - Is Dan against taking a WR 3 years in a row? No. Would that be his preference? Also, no. Not by a long shot.  - I think draft gurus are wrong. Tight end is not an early priority. They like the guys in the building enough to see them develop, but a later round guy is being looked at (just seemed like he was able to label a couple of guys "talented", but stopped short of suggesting the class is good at the top. Seemed quick to talk about the depth of the class) - If we are taking a DL, it will be in the top 2 rounds. They fall off a cliff at some point soon after. - They are targeting guys in each round. I think we are more likely to move up than down in this draft to prevent missing out on a guy. He doesn't want to give up a lot though, man loves his draft picks. - DBs are a priority. We want to come away with a safety and a nickel. Maybe even a safety that can play nickel. Thieneman sounds more and more like a real possibility, if he is there. We are taking a safety in the first 2 rounds, if I had to put money on it. - Age matters more for 1st round picks, probably (Mesidor), but not for after that (Stukes). - They have a guy or two that they want in the 1st round, but crazy things DO happen in the draft, and they may shift gears and take a different guy if someone falls that they didn't expect to be there.  - Character matters. A LOT. If a guy has character concerns of any kind, you can be pretty confident they aren't on our board. They may bring in a guy or two for a visit to gauge the validity/severity of the concern though.      
    • Yeah don't wanna see anyone get hurt.  Hopefully Chatters is sitting.
×
×
  • Create New...