Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Week 10: Saints @ Panthers Gameday Thread


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

40 minutes ago, Mills said:

I agree to a point. Outside of TMac, We still have arguably the worst receiver room in the league. Legette is a certified Dykhead.

This offense should have always been built around speedy wideouts who can get separation to give ole Noodle arm a chance to be successful. He’d still probably throw behind them but at least he wouldn’t have an excuse 

I don’t see that he has one now.  First overall, can’t adapt? Fugetabboutit 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

Guys defense have year of tape on Canales and Bryce.

This isn’t complicated. Neither are good and the nfl figured them out. 

So if you know Bryce will sink the ship but are essentially forced to play him… in a 3 point game, what do you do? You see what happens when you turn him loose to point guard. 
I can’t blame Canales for that sorry excuse for a football player he is forced to indulge. 
He may be crap too but he needs the rope to prove it with an actual QB. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, strato said:

So if you know Bryce will sink the ship but are essentially forced to play him… in a 3 point game, what do you do? You see what happens when you turn him loose to point guard. 
I can’t blame Canales for that sorry excuse for a football player he is forced to indulge. 
He may be crap too but he needs the rope to prove it with an actual QB. 

When I look at the panthers offense over the past two seasons I know I think “this guy has shown he deserves a chance to pick a qb and run another season with him.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

When I look at the panthers offense over the past two seasons I know I think “this guy has shown he deserves a chance to pick a qb and run another season with him.”

I know what you think. You have said so often enough. I think it needs to be proven with a clean slate and not having to try to drag that fuging 180lb weight around. 
I think what I asked is what is he supposed to do? 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, electro's horse said:

He accepted the job. You don’t get to wash your hands with a hiring condition.

You are assuming you know the arrangement didn’t include a contingency providing that Bryce was unfixable.

The main justification to condemn him out of hand is to believe Bryce was fixable and he failed. 
If you don’t believe that, and I didn’t, judging him on that is unfair.
 

I know the other arguments. On balance and considering realistic alternatives, I am not sold. I need to see it under conditions more conducive to success than what is in place right now. No biggie. Just think he has a big time losing hand and what the hell can you do if you are in that position? 
I think you try to ride it out and hope you get better circumstances eventually. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, strato said:

You are assuming you know the arrangement didn’t include a contingency providing that Bryce was unfixable.

 

Buddy, listen, you are correct I can’t disprove an unknowable hypothetical. You keep trotting this out like it’s not a logical fallacy. You can’t disprove a negative.

If you want to cloak yourself in made up things I can’t prove are false then more power to you. 

all I’m doing is calling what I see, and i see a coach whos averaging less than two TDs a game on offense for the better part of two seasons.

But yeah maybe the guy who doesn’t have final roster say actually negotiated a secret clause that kicks in after two seasons of eating poo.

Sure thing pal. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fig that attitude with your derisive crap. You ain’t perfect. 
 

Go round and round and your whole case is it was a money grab and Canales is too dumb to get a condition of employment that gives him life after Bryce. When the village football idiot could see that he ain’t t it and can’t be made into an NFL QB, but a pro coach can’t see that  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh please lose the locker room 

https://x.com/scott_fowler/status/1987641052480614589?s=46

Panthers OT Ickey Ekwonu said Carolina's lack of preparation was a factor in 17-7 loss to Saints today. I'm putting a longer quote than usual in here, for context, re: what he said about the Panthers' practices this past week.
Ekwonu: "We just weren't locked into the small details. And you know, a couple guys spoke about it. Coach spoke about it throughout the week. 
"And you can't get days back. You know, if you have a tough day on Thursday, tough day on Friday, or whatever, you can always look forward. But you can't get that day back. 
"So that preparation, or lack thereof, is going to add up. And unfortunately, that just cultivated to what we saw today."

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...