Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

All aboard the Patrick Peterson orchestra-train?!?!?


SorthNarolina

Recommended Posts

By drafting DT our secondary instantly improves.

Such a wide spread lie. No our secondary would not instantly improve. As it stands we would have Gamble and Capt with a hole at Nickle. A third round Corner is not gonna have the impact PP would. That said i think we could work with a 3rd round DT and still be improved. I have heard Peterson compared to Charles Woodson. FTW i want a Woodson in our secondary. Fairley is a holdout and off field nightmare in the making.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By drafting DT our secondary instantly improves.

Not true, by drafting a GOOD DT, our secondary automatically improves. You guys get too caught up with positions some times. It might be the case that the FO simply isn't comfortable with the DT's in this draft. Gotta keep things open.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it were my call (and they were willing to do so, I'd trade Buffalo for their 1st & 2nd rounders, plus a draft pick in 2012 (stocking up for Luck!). I'd then take Patrick Peterson & Kyle Rudolph with those picks :D

There's a reason I'm not making these decisions though >.>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we can trade down, net an extra 2nd, still take PP and get Rudolph in the 2nd, load up for next year, trade our 3rd for a future 2nd, add a solid DT with our compensatory 3rd. Holy sh*t man I will run around my condo naked cheering and doing backflips off the walls and knocking everything over with my d**k.

(and with my luck they'll all up being busts lol)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im gonna say this again but I'm sure that as usual no one wil listen. DT's even very highly touted early first round DT's almost always take YEARS to develop. I do not want to wait 3 years for our 1st round pick to deliver when we are the worst team in the league. Glen Dorsey was freaking ridiculous in college. He won almost every defensive award applicable to his position. But, he is just now starting to produce. However he isn't considered a bust because this is typical for DT's. Suh is a freak of nature and a fluke and isn't in this draft.

I'd be pretty happy with PP as the pick but he would be there if we traded down most likely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Such a wide spread lie. No our secondary would not instantly improve. As it stands we would have Gamble and Capt with a hole at Nickle. A third round Corner is not gonna have the impact PP would. That said i think we could work with a 3rd round DT and still be improved. I have heard Peterson compared to Charles Woodson. FTW i want a Woodson in our secondary. Fairley is a holdout and off field nightmare in the making.

Hold out? Lol. Rookie wage scale will pre-empt that, not that I think it would be an issue anyway.

Like it or not, it's tried and true that an effective pass rush is a CB's best friend and for good reason. QB's don't have time for routes to develop, WR's don't have time to stretch the field and more mistakes are made.

Your argument simply has no teeth.

Now I have no problem with drafting PP, especially if he throws down a sub 4.3 at the combine. However, the biggest thing we need is a DT. I'd have no problem taking one in the 3rd.

Plus, I think Marshall will be back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to make a single thread for one player

don't worry, many threads have been made about this same player already. I myself made one supporting him for the #1 overall a couple of weeks ago.

I like the pick but I've moved on to one of the 2 DE's now as a better option at the #1 overall. Hopefully it won't be Fairly or worse, Newton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...