Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The quality stats USUALLY tell the story: Bryce outplayed Stafford today...and the Panthers won


SCO96
 Share

Recommended Posts

This also the first offensive game all season where I felt we blended a lot of things that work for us into a complete game. Everyone ate their piece of the pie. Want more of this and less of the Falcons Bryce takeovers and Rico forced runs. 9ers game showed how one dimensional we can get with the script. This game showed adaptability and responding to whatever the defense throws at us. Loved every bit of it 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SCO96 said:

Check out the final stat line for Young 

C/ATT YDS AVG TD INT SACKS RTG  
15/20 206 10.3 3 0 2-12 147.1  

 

Stafford:

C/ATT YDS AVG TD INT SACKS RTG  
18/28 243 8.7 2 2 2-16 85.9  

About a year or two ago I heard Keyshawn Johnson make a statement that I have never forgotten. I don't have the exact quote, but I'll paraphrase.

You don't need your QB to throw for 300 yards every week. All you need is:

1) A  guy who can drop back 20-25 times per game and not turn the ball over.

2) Pass for approximately 200-220 yards per game

3) Make about 2-3 explosive pass completions per game 

4) Put over 21 points on the scoreboard for most weeks. 

Bryce did all of the above and we won.

I'd like to add that he won the crucial Yards/attempt battle today as well. A passer who averages 7.0 yds/att is a solid player.

Stafford score was 8.7, which is way above the normal. He only lost today because of the turnovers.

Bryce averaged 10.3! That's an elite performance for 20 drop-backs. 

So there's a couple issues with this thinking about the type of QB you need to win games.

Those QB's win regular season games, but they do not win you playoff games in this day and age of the NFL.  And that's what the anti-Bryce people have been saying for years, he's just never going to be that type of QB who can drag an inferior team to wins because of their QB play.

The other is "make 2-3 explosive completions per game" is giving a lot of credit to Bryce for making 2 throws today that literally every single starting QB should be able to make with their eyes closed.  He made two well placed lofted throws with no safety help on either of them, that yes, lead to an explosive play, but aren't exactly ones you can objectively say were explosive because of the QB's throw.

Also all of your post fails to recognize that in the end, Bryce still didn't "win us this game" as much as Stafford's turnovers cost the Rams the game.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

So there's a couple issues with this thinking about the type of QB you need to win games.

Those QB's win regular season games, but they do not win you playoff games in this day and age of the NFL.  And that's what the anti-Bryce people have been saying for years, he's just never going to be that type of QB who can drag an inferior team to wins because of their QB play.

The other is "make 2-3 explosive completions per game" is giving a lot of credit to Bryce for making 2 throws today that literally every single starting QB should be able to make with their eyes closed.  He made two well placed lofted throws with no safety help on either of them, that yes, lead to an explosive play, but aren't exactly ones you can objectively say were explosive because of the QB's throw.

Also all of your post fails to recognize that in the end, Bryce still didn't "win us this game" as much as Stafford's turnovers cost the Rams the game.

To be fair, when Keyshawn was speaking he also said that the above scenario is most affective when the team is solid on both sides of the ball. He mentioned his 2002 Tampa team that won the SB with Brad Johnson as their QB but was known for their smothering defense with Brooks, Sapp, Rice, Lynch, and Barber.

Still, you really can't argue with what Keyshawn said. If Bruce put the above stat-line up every week, had a run game that averaged over 4.0 per attempt and 120 yds per game, with this year's defense, NO TEAM IN THE NFC WOULD WANT TO PLAY US IN THE PLAYOFFS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SCO96 said:

To be fair, when Keyshawn was speaking he also said that the above scenario is most affective when the team is solid on both sides of the ball. He mentioned his 2002 Tampa team that won the SB with Brad Johnson as their QB but was known for their smothering defense with Brooks, Sapp, Rice, Lynch, and Barber.

Still, you really can't argue with what Keyshawn said. If Bruce put the above stat-line up every week, had a run game that averaged over 4.0 per attempt and 120 yds per game, with this year's defense, NO TEAM IN THE NFC WOULD WANT TO PLAY US IN THE PLAYOFFS

Oh I get what he was saying, but it really was more applicable 2 decades ago than today.

In today's game you get last year's Vikings.

A team that might put up a good record when the ball bounces their way enough times, but in the end, that QB isn't going to be able to will the team to victories when it's needed and they're going to end up losing badly in the big games when it matters because they're not able to step up when needed.

If Stafford doesn't have 2 red zone turnovers and a pick 6, I don't think Bryce is willing the team to victory today in that weather.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, SCO96 said:

Check out the final stat line for Young 

C/ATT YDS AVG TD INT SACKS RTG  
15/20 206 10.3 3 0 2-12 147.1  

 

Stafford:

C/ATT YDS AVG TD INT SACKS RTG  
18/28 243 8.7 2 2 2-16 85.9  

About a year or two ago I heard Keyshawn Johnson make a statement that I have never forgotten. I don't have the exact quote, but I'll paraphrase.

You don't need your QB to throw for 300 yards every week. All you need is:

1) A  guy who can drop back 20-25 times per game and not turn the ball over.

2) Pass for approximately 200-220 yards per game

3) Make about 2-3 explosive pass completions per game 

4) Put over 21 points on the scoreboard for most weeks. 

Bryce did all of the above and we won.

I'd like to add that he won the crucial Yards/attempt battle today as well. A passer who averages 7.0 yds/att is a solid player.

Stafford score was 8.7, which is way above the normal. He only lost today because of the turnovers.

Bryce averaged 10.3! That's an elite performance for 20 drop-backs. 

While I don’t disagree with Key’s take at all, I’ll add the caveats that:

*you have to have a QB you trust to do those things

*he has to do them consistently

and that’s been the issue with Bryce.  We don’t and he hasn’t.  I’m hoping he does the remainder of this season.

Also, I think it goes without saying, for Key’s musts to work, you have to have a great defense and incredible run game in the modern NFL.  Again, what he cites can work, but it is a bit of an antiquated approach to quarterbacking and offense in general now.  That was a great blueprint in the 90s.  It can work, but it’s tough to have all those pieces align.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bryce didn’t outplay Stafford.  Stafford was asked to be a NFL QB all game and mistakes were made.   Bryce was treated like a 3rd string QB the entire game…..and then on 4th down Canales frankly called 2 really dumb plays that worked out insanely well.  The exact calls people have said are why he shouldn’t be a NFL coach.  We have seen the need 2 yards and Bryce chucking it incomplete on repeat this year 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:
12 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

If Stafford doesn't have 2 red zone turnovers and a pick 6, I don't think Bryce is willing the team to victory today in that weather.  

 

I can't argue with your statement.

But, Stafford didn't follow Keyshawn's script. He threw 2 INTs (one for a pick 6) and lost a 3rd turnover on a strip sack on a potential game winning drive. He turned the ball over and Bryce DIDN'T.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, CRA said:

Bryce didn’t outplay Stafford.  Stafford was asked to be a NFL QB all game and mistakes were made.   Bryce was treated like a 3rd string QB the entire game…..and then on 4th down Canales frankly called 2 really dumb plays that worked out insanely well.  The exact calls people have said are why he shouldn’t be a NFL coach.  We have seen the need 2 yards and Bryce chucking it incomplete on repeat this year 

 

To be fair that's what Canales has said all along that he just wants his QB to make 5/6 big time plays a game and just take all the easy stuff the rest of the game 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

To be fair that's what Canales has said all along that he just wants his QB to make 5/6 big time plays a game and just take all the easy stuff the rest of the game 

I mean, he didn’t complete a single pass over 10 yards on any normal down the entire game.  Took can’t take sacks again.  Canales basically pulled out his dumb plays he gets trashed for all season again…..and it worked out for the fist time in spectacular fashion on 4th down for change. Thats the game. 

No coach or team is lookiing for that.  

I get the win.  It was fun.  Derrick Brown was awesome to watch.  Chubba  getting some redemption.  But every single time almost the Panthers do something fun and exciting it’s folks rushing to try to use it as why maybe Bryce isn’t a backup caliber QB after all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...