Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Go after Shedeur this offseason.


Proudiddy
 Share

Recommended Posts

You guys sure have some sick burns for people who have preached patience for 3 straight years to wait for a QB to show us he is the 32nd ranked starting QB since he’s been in the league.  I also said to never trade up in the 2023 draft and wait for Drake Maye the next year.  Yet, here we are.  But yuck it up fellas…

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, strato said:

I am not on his jock but not sure why wanting to avoid being behind Lamar Jackson is worthy of scorn. 

That could be a 4 year sentence to having pine splinters in his butt. Which might be good for him for a couple of years… not 4 though. 

He's following logic set forth by the great 17th century football coach John Milton 😐

A rookie with a losing record in college refusing to sit behind a well established NFL starter is definitely a red flag. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tr3ach said:

He has looked genuinely bad minus a throw or two every game until this one... for someone who has been bashing our qb since day one basically, youre awfully high on this guy after one good game against the worst team in the nfl.

lol Shedeur is a rookie and is already better than Bryce.  Bryce didn’t have a single game like that as a rookie.  Shedeur has only started, what?  2 or 3 games?  And it’s not after one good game, I’ve been saying he was possibly the best QB in this draft class - number two at worst, prior to the draft.  I think he fell because owners had an axe to grind with Deion and Shedeur also suffers from the same issue Cam faced as a personality - he’s too big to be a backup and teams don’t want that distraction in their backup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

You guys sure have some sick burns for people who have preached patience for 3 straight years to wait for a QB to show us he is the 32nd ranked starting QB since he’s been in the league.  I also said to never trade up in the 2023 draft and wait for Drake Maye the next year.  Yet, here we are.  But yuck it up fellas…

It also takes patience to not give up resources for a guy who's had two starts, one of those being against the worst team in the league.

As mentioned, that's Matt Flynn style thinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

He's following logic set forth by the great 17th century football coach John Milton 😐

A rookie with a losing record in college refusing to sit behind a well established NFL starter is definitely a red flag. 

Yeah. Well you want a clear path you don’t want to be blocked. Loser winner whatever. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, strato said:

Yeah. Well you want a clear path you don’t want to be blocked. Loser winner whatever. 

The word there is entitlement.

And no, NFL teams aren't gonna want to deal with that...nor should they.

Realistically, if he didn't have his dad's name behind him, nobody would be hyping this kid as the next big thing. 

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today regardless of the Browns loss, Shedeur #144 pick outplayed the #1 pick. If he gets a full off season and starts next year I think he will do well.  The only time that would have been good to grab him was just how the Browns got him for cheap.  I would have drafted him as he would have been better than Dalton as a backup. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The word there is entitlement.

And no, NFL teams aren't gonna want to deal with that...nor should they.

Realistically, if he didn't have his dad's name behind him, nobody would be hyping this kid as the next big thing. 

That sounds like your baggage. Can he play or not? That is the question. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It also takes patience to not give up resources for a guy who's had two starts, one of those being against the worst team in the league.

As mentioned, that's Matt Flynn style thinking.

Some of this is just brainstorming/throwing poo against the wall, seeing as how we have one of the least talented QB rooms in the league.  We need a talent infusion badly.  I feel Shedeur has the prerequisite talent athletically and as a passer, and I have since his college career.  Do I think he will actually be traded this offseason?  99% not likely.  On one hand, he’s proven to likely be the best QB on their roster.  On the other, they, and no other team wanted to take a chance on him for 4 rounds, so there has to be a price they would be willing to part ways with him for.  That’s why I brought up the Joe Milton situation as an example.  He was drafted to a team who took another rookie QB much earlier in the draft, spent his rookie year with them, then was traded before his second year for a relatively low value.  But, again, I also think the attention Shedeur naturally garners makes teams uncomfortable about rostering him if he’s not a starter.

I don’t think we trade for him, and I don’t think the Browns trade him anywhere.  That being said, this is a message board.  Possibilities are fun to discuss and we’re here for discussion.

also,I’m talking about a trade for a mid-late round pick for a talented QB/developmental QB on his rookie deal; that is the antithesis of the Matt Flynn situation.  He had a solid couple games in GB and Seattle broke the bank on him and he bombed big time.  That’s a valley of difference between the situations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Realistically, if he didn't have his dad's name behind him, nobody would be hyping this kid as the next big thing. 

There is an argument that his dad's name has been a ball-and-chain. 

Shedeur hasn't acted entitled at all while he's been in this league. He's actually been saying the right things from all the reports I've heard. He's still a young guy, so solid maturity is going to take a little while. I agree that his body of work is very scant, but comparatively to other rookies with two or three starts, he's looked better. He isn't supposed to be perfect, but he's definitely shown a little promise. Perhaps with more starts he will improve. I don't think that's exactly going out on a limb to say that...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Brady and Belichick have always been incredibly unlikeable and have multiple cheating scandals. I get not enjoying seeing the same team win a lot but I don’t understand that as a reason for hating them like a lot of people do — blame all the other teams that haven’t been able to beat them, it’s not like this is the MLB with no cap and they’re just outspending everyone like the Dodgers. It’s an even playing field and they’ve just been better than everyone else. Mahomes’ family can be kind of annoying but I’ve never seen any reason at all to dislike him on or off the field. And Reid is about as likable as it gets for a coach. I can’t believe all the people out there overjoyed by and slobbering at the broncos winning the division over them, with fuging scumbag Sean Payton as coach. 
    • Politics aside I got tired of seeing the Pats in the Super Bowl almost every year, then Brady with the Bucs, the Chiefs filled that void in an annoying way, just ready to mix it up and have a new champion every year instead of these dynasty teams
    • Sycophants sold out to Young falsely portray doubters as not wanting to win.  Lame. We want to win. Of course. But one barely winning season at 9-8 doesn’t prove poo in the big picture. It feels good, sure. Fine.  It is more we don’t believe Young, so far, has demonstrated that he is the answer. And having the answer is far more important to us than a single season’s winning record. That maybe… maybe, happens by a game.  How many real games has he had that can demand we bow down to a multi year commitment and declare the issue settled? Not enough for us. And that is the big picture objective. I would bet collectively we see the people who are sold off of the three or four good games while ignoring equal numbers of bad games - some that we somehow still won, some we lost - as not having high enough standards. 
×
×
  • Create New...