Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I got a fever. And the only cure, is more Princely.


TylerDurden
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, TylerDurden said:

Maybe it’s just me, but I’m wondering why we aren’t playing him more snaps?  I have loved flashes I’ve seen from him throughout the season, and he flashed a couple times Sunday.  I would love to see him get more of Wonnum’s snaps opposite Scourton.  I really think the future is bright for both of them.

He is very raw and has made a ton of bad mistakes over the course of the year. He has definitely also shown flashes of greatness. Pretty much what I expect out of a third rounder

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, tukafan21 said:

I agree, we don't need to draft another young edge rusher to add to this group, even a 1st rounder as we'll now be late in the round too.

Biggest FA contract should go to the best pass rusher we can sign, use that 1st on a LB or S

Depends on who is there. The EDGE/DE group looks pretty top heavy and it's unlikely they last until we pick. 

But, the group overall is extremely bad so adding depth isn't a bad thing.

We need one elite, near elite guy to at least prop the group up.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I looked at Evero's career stats and the highest his defenses have ever finished in Sacks is 23rd.

2025: 28th

2024: 29th

2023: 32nd

2022: 23rd

He also hasn't had a good front 7 pass rush three of those years (and the 2022 Broncos pass rush wasn't particularly talented either outside of Chubb).

Cover 3 zone (Evero's primary zone) usually leaves underneath routes open, so QBs will usually have that checkdown option with the DC's hope that somebody then steps up to make the tackle for a short gain. Think of our Seahawks game - while the Seahawks didn't get a ton of sacks, Bryce got baited into the checkdown and the Seahawks wrapped up and tackled the RB/TE almost immediately every time for practically no gain.

Unfortunately for us, half of our starters are rocking missed tackles rates that makes me want to vomit, so those 2 yard checkdowns to RBs turn into 10 yards in a hurry.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

He also hasn't had a good front 7 pass rush three of those years (and the 2022 Broncos pass rush wasn't particularly talented either outside of Chubb).

Cover 3 zone (Evero's primary zone) usually leaves underneath routes open, so QBs will usually have that checkdown option with the DC's hope that somebody then steps up to make the tackle for a short gain. Think of our Seahawks game - while the Seahawks didn't get a ton of sacks, Bryce got baited into the checkdown and the Seahawks wrapped up and tackled the RB/TE almost immediately every time for practically no gain.

Unfortunately for us, half of our starters are rocking missed tackles rates that makes me want to vomit, so those 2 yard checkdowns to RBs turn into 10 yards in a hurry.

Well he did have Brown and Burns in 2023. I realize that version of Brown was absolutely nothing like this version.

I do think it is some of both. He hasn't had the talent but his schemes also don't result in effective QB pressure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Well he did have Brown and Burns in 2023. I realize that version of Brown was absolutely nothing like this version.

I do think it is some of both. He hasn't had the talent but his schemes also don't result in effective QB pressure.

True, but teams also 1) didn't need to pass on us because they could run it away from DB, and 2) our offense was so putrid that other team just started from inside our 30 yard line half time game (and again just ran it against us).

Let's also not forget that Burns was a PFF darling because he had a good pass rush win rate. What those stats don't tell us is that the dude had oven mitts for hands and missed the sack on the QB like 80% of the time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

True, but teams also 1) didn't need to pass on us because they could run it away from DB, and 2) our offense was so putrid that other team just started from inside our 30 yard line half time game (and again just ran it against us).

Let's also not forget that Burns was a PFF darling because he had a good pass rush win rate. What those stats don't tell us is that the dude had oven mitts for hands and missed the sack on the QB like 80% of the time

True but he actually did speed up the QB's decision making process. We literally don't field a single player that can do that on even a relatively consistent basis.

Nic Scourton led our team in Pressures in 2025 with 15. That is tied for 80th in the NFL.

Burns career low in pressures(even lower than his rookie season) was playing in that Evero defense. 

Screenshot_20260105_094942.thumb.jpg.f4d71681d28f281c97bc4fd31511ebc0.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Well, technically it's QB but I do agree an elite pass rusher is absolutely critical. We cannot keep being one of the worst pass rush teams in the NFL.

I have dismissed thinking QB--it seems our strategy is to build around this QB instead of getting an elite one.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I have dismissed thinking QB--it seems our strategy is to build around this QB instead of getting an elite one.  

I get the mindset but we don't have to have our heads in the sand, even if the organization does.

7 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Remember how much slander birds got for taking pierce and walker. 

I dont like them having a better pass rush than us. 

For as stacked of an EDGE/DE class as 2025 was supposed to be, the early returns were very paltry. Only Pierce really produced at a high level. I was surprised more of that class didn't have a bigger initial impact. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A team should do everything they can to prop up their investment in a QB regardless of who it is. 
    • I am not wanting to be too judgemental of Morgan over his first draft given the circumstances.  People don’t like my rationale but you know, I don’t so much like theirs either.  I was adamantly against drafting Bryce and very resentful over the extreme (imo) measures taken to prop him up. I feel like Dan got caught in that trap with demands or conditions placed on him to help out the QB and the new Offensive minded head coach.  And my biased opinion is that it was still all Bryce centric. Micro managed and solely focused on making him a viable player after his first disastrous season. Mandated to help the offense in that draft.  I feel like my speculation is reasonable given the climate and situation, and it includes the reasons we didn’t take a C, the reasons we overdrafted a RB and that particular WR. It was totally need based. Perceived needs. All to maximize Bryce.    And if it were me, and I wanted the GM slot of my team that I came up with, I would be willing to accede to the agenda that I feel was in place. The goals he had to meet.  It is pretty simple, just put Bryce’s needs at the center of everything that was done and work your way through it.  I have no idea or inside info, and people have mocked my opinion for it but that is what it is, it still makes sense to me. 
    • We can’t lose this guy he is the brains behind the operation 
×
×
  • Create New...