Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Someone's not gonna be happy


cranky
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

I'm OK with picking up the 5th year option (mostly because there aren't any clear long-term better options likely to be available in the offseason) but I need to see a lot more consistency before I'd support a full-on contract extension.

Its year 3. I don’t think he will ever be consistent 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Do you want actual or potential options?

He doesn’t want either. He’s using a rhetorical device called a thought terminating cliche. An example of this would be any time someone says something like “well it doesn’t matter no one will do <thing being argued about>.”

he’s not actually interested in debate about this; he wants to nitpick specifics from a list of options that are unknown as you pointed out. Then he’ll just burden of proof you to death. The person most famous for this kind of arguing ended up exsanguinated from a hole in his neck, cucked before his body got cold.

the correct answer of course to “who specifically,” based on the past three years, is basically anyone that steps on the field.

Why speculate about who specifically the player is when we’ve seen it can be Phillip rivers, Russell Wilson, or Daniel jones.

Just get literally anyone. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 4
  • Flames 3
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Do you want actual or potential options? The CURRENT free agent list is available but that will likely change quite a bit based on what we are seeing happen already.

Who specifically would you bring in that would be better than Young. I do not need the complete list of FA's. Just tell me which available QB you would bring in that you think would upgrade the Panthers' offense next year. 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, electro&#x27;s horse said:

He doesn’t want either. He’s using a rhetorical device called a thought terminating cliche. An example of this would be any time someone says something like “well it doesn’t matter no one will do <thing being argued about>.”

he’s not actually interested in debate about this; he wants to nitpick specifics from a list of options that are unknown as you pointed out. Then he’ll just burden of proof you to death. The person most famous for this kind of arguing ended up exsanguinated from a hole in his neck, cucked before his body got cold.

the correct answer of course to “who specifically,” based on the past three years, is basically anyone that steps on the field.

Why speculate about who specifically the player is when we’ve seen it can be Phillip rivers, Russell Wilson, or Daniel jones.

Just get literally anyone. 

Oh I am aware. He is a Forever Brycer.

He was expecting I wouldn't even reply or give a wishy washy answer.

The truth is, there will be ample options at least as good as Bryce with far, far higher ceilings and a smaller group of CLEARLY better than Bryce options available, as well.

And that's not even touching the draft.

It's a far shorter list to find QB's in the NFL that are demonstrably WORSE than Bryce. Although I do have that list available, as well.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, cranky said:

Who specifically would you bring in that would be better than Young. I do not need the complete list of FA's. Just tell me which available QB you would bring in that you think would upgrade the Panthers' offense next year. 

So I get to pick, in god-like fashion whomever I want with no limits????

I am attempting to give realistic or potential options but if you just want me to start listing better QB's than Bryce, I can do that too.

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like cranky just in case you’re sincere and this isn’t just some bit (laudatory if so) what you’re doing is borderline sea lioning and that’s a bad look.

if you’re unfamiliar with that term you’re basically forcing a conversation, getting defensive about being belittled, and never bringing anything worth debating to the table.

you’ve posted an opinion piece from someone who starts it off by admitting how wrong he’s been about this.

you need the light of islam Bro. Log off and recite the shahada. 

  • Pie 5
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

So I get to pick, in god-like fashion whomever I want with no limits????

I am attempting to give realistic or potential options but if you just want me to start listing better QB's than Bryce, I can do that too.

It's a serious question regardless of electro's nonsense post. The limit is they have to be available net season. So they need to be a free agent or someone from the draft. Or, if there is a BU QB the Panther's could legitimately trade for. SO it needs to be realistic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, cranky said:

It's a serious question regardless of electro's nonsense post. The limit is they have to be available net season. So they need to be a free agent or someone from the draft. Or, if there is a BU QB the Panther's could legitimately trade for. SO it needs to be realistic.

Placing made up restrictions on speculation about replacing a midget we made the worst trade in thirty years for. Powerful. 

  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Another thread where the Huddle melts down over a Bryce comment.  "Conversations" and "Bryce Young has been signed to a new long-term contract" are still far away from being the gospel.  For a fanbase that has watched two top-3 drafted QBs come here, and us move on, only to see them elevate their play elsewhere, I find it comical. Bryce is flawed but this org is damned if you do and damned if you don't with BY9.  Why would our GM and HC say anything other than supportive about their QB1. Yes, he's extended, but I truly do not think if he goes out and has a repeat of the previous seasons, that he is here beyond 2027. They're giving him every opportunity and surrounding him with a ridiculous amount of assets on both sides of the ball. If he continues to pitch 110 yd/ game and cough up the ball while everyone else is busting their ass, no way Dan keeps him beyond the extension.   
    • Ooof, I was not a Proctor fan. I agree w/ a lot of smarter folks than me that he's more of a guard and think his weight fluctuation is going to be something to navigate. I liked Lomu a lot, but figured there would be more talented guys there at 19. I also wasn't big on bringing in a TE via the draft. If it's not a vet (Njoku) or a trade for Mayer or Kmet, I'd just as soon see what the youngsters have. No need cluttering the room with more of the same.
    • Sam Darnold & Bryce Young are two very different Qbs ..just saying the last 25 years approximately 2/3 of ALL  first round Qb's  in the NFL were or are bust.so for everyone who makes it like a Sam Darnold you have two that don't make it or are a bust 
×
×
  • Create New...