Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Your Feelings on Bryce Through 3 Seasons? (POLL)


Hoenheim
 Share

Your belief in bryce through 3 years   

231 members have voted

  1. 1. How encouraged are you by bryce youngs performance thus far through 3 years

    • 10 Love him , franchise QB for the next decade
      2
    • 9 He's great but needs a tiny bit of polishing
      9
    • 8 He's very good
      15
    • 7 He's good, but not great.
      35
    • 6 he's decent maybe slightly above average
      54
    • 5 he's an average nfl qb that may be destined to be a backup caliber QB
      69
    • 4 he's bad, but he can be at least decent with a couple more years of experience
      13
    • 3 Not a good QB, probably can't be redeemed. But maybe he can be a project someone else can fix
      28
    • 1-2 Terrible, get him off my team, yesterday.
      6


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

If Bryce hadn't folded like a cheap suit on the last drive, we'd still be in the playoffs. Probably could have done a lot better if we'd spent some of the huge amount of resources to get Bryce to mediocre on our defense. 

Technically we most likely would not have won on that drive just tied. 
But I am in agreement about that last 38. Nothing. Folded. Bring Canales in if you need to, but don’t leave Bryce out. Ball was in his hands 4 times. And we got zip. 

 

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, strato said:

Technically we most likely would not have won on that drive just tied. 
But I am in agreement about that last 38. Nothing. Folded. Bring Canales in if you need to, but don’t leave Bryce out. Ball was in his hands 4 times. And we got zip. 

 

 

Canales is 100% at fault for calling long balls on the 1st 3 plays. Didn't need to get it all in one chunk with 3 time outs. But it's also Bryce's job to know the situation, read the defense, and adapt to what's being given. With 3 timeouts you have the option to go into the middle of the field and stop the clock. Situational awareness by DC and BY were both horrible. DC does not have the chops to be HC and OC. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Canales is 100% at fault for calling long balls on the 1st 3 plays. Didn't need to get it all in one chunk with 3 time outs. But it's also Bryce's job to know the situation, read the defense, and adapt to what's being given. With 3 timeouts you have the option to go into the middle of the field and stop the clock. Situational awareness by DC and BY were both horrible. DC does not have the chops to be HC and OC. 

I don’t remember the game but I could swear we saw that earlier in the year. Same fold.

The 5th to last pass Young made was absolutely a big time throw.  That last bit, turn in your clutch card. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, shaq said:

10 of the top 14 defensive teams in EPA per play made the playoffs. Defensive EPA is the gold standard for how we grade and value defenses. Having a good defense is imperative to having a successful team. To your point of this team being a QB away I adamantly disagree I think we’re realistically 1-2 good off seasons away roster construction wise from truly competing for a Super Bowl. To your point that the offense needs to be upgraded I entirely agree, we were far too inconsistent last year and our running game fell off a cliff the last 6 weeks.

I don't see how you can logically make that argument when the team beat two of the top teams in the entire league during the regular season.  Now imagine the additional games we would have won against absolute tip top competitors like SF and SEA had we had a professional QB.  You can throw any random stat at the problem you want, but the proof is in the pudding.  We all watched it live.  This roster would have produced 13 wins (wins against SF and SEA, two wins against NO, and would have swept the Bucs) and (almost certainly) a #1 seed with a remotely competent QB.  Those were not games where we needed an all star performance to win.  Those were games where a very, very modest stat line would have netted us an easy win.

Nearly every measurable aspect of the team would have been significantly improved with a competent QB.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

You'd be wrong in your assumptions. I watched the whole thing start to finish. Wasn't a fan at all of the prevent, but I think it had more to do with Horn being out and a CB that had barely played on the field. 

 

The middle of the field was wide open and we had 3 time outs to burn. Bryce is supposed to read the defense, change the play if necessary, which it was, and go from there. Get some yards, call the TO. 

A franchise QB, an elite processing QB, any QB, has to be able to do these things. Bryce is mediocre at best. 16 games to break 3k yards on the last play of regular season, c'mon. 

But we're picking up his 5th so there's that now. Teppers commitment to mediocrity continues. 

You're not making a good-faith argument by blaming literally everything on the quarterback when the defense gave him a fat 38 seconds to overcome its ineptitude, but it seems you're dead-set on blaming him for any problem the team encounters. In this case, it's not warranted. Sometimes it is.

But he had no time to throw (pressured on 46% of all dropbacks, an insane amount) and that's simply not all his fault -- particularly when they rush 4 or less and are in the backfield in 1.5s or less.

Should we have gotten more than 0 yards? Sure! But he hit a WR in the hands on fourth down and it was dropped. Not his fault. He missed one throw on second down but I attribute first down to a bad play call and third down to poor pass protection. I would've called some quick slants, personally, but it really seems you're saying:

- playcalling: Bryce's fault
- poor pass protection: Bryce's fault
- defensive choking away a lead: Bryce's fault, not the defense
- Horn dropping a pass: Bryce's fault

It's a great way to garner support on here, because when it comes to Bryce, logic takes such a backseat to context that it's not even in the same vehicle. Plenty of games can be attributed to him. Can't take anyone seriously who solely blames him for that one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Joe Bear said:

Bryce Young's performance and whatever anyone thinks of it shouldn't become a built-in excuse, let alone a crutch, for the worst pass rush in the NFL. 

It's 100% part of the problem.  I am not saying we don't need upgrades.  Of course we do.  That said, we had a two touchdown lead ONCE in the ENTIRE season.  One time.  That's insanity.  It absolutely sets the defense up to fail when you have garbage time of possession and can never get a lead that affords them the luxury of playing aggressively.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Joe Bear said:

You're not making a good-faith argument by blaming literally everything on the quarterback when the defense gave him a fat 38 seconds to overcome its ineptitude, but it seems you're dead-set on blaming him for any problem the team encounters. In this case, it's not warranted. Sometimes it is.

But he had no time to throw (pressured on 46% of all dropbacks, an insane amount) and that's simply not all his fault -- particularly when they rush 4 or less and are in the backfield in 1.5s or less.

Should we have gotten more than 0 yards? Sure! But he hit a WR in the hands on fourth down and it was dropped. Not his fault. He missed one throw on second down but I attribute first down to a bad play call and third down to poor pass protection. I would've called some quick slants, personally, but it really seems you're saying:

- playcalling: Bryce's fault
- poor pass protection: Bryce's fault
- defensive choking away a lead: Bryce's fault, not the defense
- Horn dropping a pass: Bryce's fault

It's a great way to garner support on here, because when it comes to Bryce, logic takes such a backseat to context that it's not even in the same vehicle. Plenty of games can be attributed to him. Can't take anyone seriously who solely blames him for that one. 

I'm looking at the final drive, and that's where I'm laying the blame at Bryce's feet. Stepping up to the line, 38 seconds left, 3 time outs on the clock. 30 yards needed to attempt a FG. It's not Bryce's job to call the plays, that's DC's and it was terrible play calling.  It's Bryce's job to read what the defense is giving him at the line. The middle of the field is open. Rams are guarding against the deep ball and bringing pressure leaving the middle of the field ripe for the taking. Knowing his line not holding up for long, Bryce should have read the defense, called the audible, and thrown to the middle of the field for 6- 8 yards, like you said, quick slants would have worked. Then run either hurry up or call a TO. We had time. He has to make the adjustments. Any QB has to make the adjustments.

 The pass Horn dropped hit his hands but was at his knees. Should he have slid and caught it? Probably. Was the pass a good one? No it wasn't. Both players were at fault, not just Horn. Let's not pretend that Bryce threw a beautiful pass that hit the receiver chest high right in the hands in perfect stride because that damn sure wasn't the throw. 

The defense didn't choke away a lead. They never had a real lead. Choking away a lead is being up by multiple scores late in the 4th and losing. We were up by 4 and handed the ball back to a potential MVP with an All pro WR and potential future HoF WR2. One score games in the 4th are a slug fest. 28-3. That's choking away a lead. 

I don't solely blame Bryce for the game, but you seem to solely blame the defense for the game because they went to prevent after losing Horn. You are forgetting the short field that the offense left them that led to the early Puka TD on one of our 2 failed 4th down conversions. Our defense has been given very limited resources over the past 3 years while we have tried to put everything possible around Bryce. We added a little bit to the D this year after giving up a NFL record in points last year. Our defense overachieved based on what they've been given to work with. 

Edited by SmokinwithWilly
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

I don't see how you can logically make that argument when the team beat two of the top teams in the entire league during the regular season.  Now imagine the additional games we would have won against absolute tip top competitors like SF and SEA had we had a professional QB.  You can throw any random stat at the problem you want, but the proof is in the pudding.  We all watched it live.  This roster would have produced 13 wins (wins against SF and SEA, two wins against NO, and would have swept the Bucs) and (almost certainly) a #1 seed with a remotely competent QB.  Those were not games where we needed an all star performance to win.  Those were games where a very, very modest stat line would have netted us an easy win.

Nearly every measurable aspect of the team would have been significantly improved with a competent QB.

Your debating with emotion I’m disproving the points you make with facts and statistics. You’re using arbitrary opinion statements to make a point that is illogical. We were a -70 point differential team last year, we lost to the saints twice this is a growing and young team not a contender. Clearly your not a Bryce guy, I most likely have a higher opinion of him then you do but that is besides the point. Even with an average to above average QB this is not a contending team. We have far too many holes to fill paired with a nonexistent pass rush. We need to invest in building our defense and let Bryce and this offense to continue to develop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Joe Bear said:

You're not making a good-faith argument by blaming literally everything on the quarterback when the defense gave him a fat 38 seconds to overcome its ineptitude, but it seems you're dead-set on blaming him for any problem the team encounters. In this case, it's not warranted. Sometimes it is.

But he had no time to throw (pressured on 46% of all dropbacks, an insane amount) and that's simply not all his fault -- particularly when they rush 4 or less and are in the backfield in 1.5s or less.

Should we have gotten more than 0 yards? Sure! But he hit a WR in the hands on fourth down and it was dropped. Not his fault. He missed one throw on second down but I attribute first down to a bad play call and third down to poor pass protection. I would've called some quick slants, personally, but it really seems you're saying:

- playcalling: Bryce's fault
- poor pass protection: Bryce's fault
- defensive choking away a lead: Bryce's fault, not the defense
- Horn dropping a pass: Bryce's fault

It's a great way to garner support on here, because when it comes to Bryce, logic takes such a backseat to context that it's not even in the same vehicle. Plenty of games can be attributed to him. Can't take anyone seriously who solely blames him for that one. 

You realise giving Brady, Brees, Manning 38 seconds and 3 TOs used to be a death sentence, right?

Now I know they're all Hall of Famers, but they got the same treatment Young has received - no viable backup, it's your ship to steer, loads of investment in talent around them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, shaq said:

Your debating with emotion I’m disproving the points you make with facts and statistics. You’re using arbitrary opinion statements to make a point that is illogical. We were a -70 point differential team last year, we lost to the saints twice this is a growing and young team not a contender. Clearly your not a Bryce guy, I most likely have a higher opinion of him then you do but that is besides the point. Even with an average to above average QB this is not a contending team. We have far too many holes to fill paired with a nonexistent pass rush. We need to invest in building our defense and let Bryce and this offense to continue to develop.

There's no emotion involved at all.  We all, quite literally, watched these events unfold on the field.  Two games were 30 point blowouts.  The point differential is an extremely misleading measure.  Your logic evaporates when you say the team isn't ready to be a contender, yet literally was highly competitive against, and in some cases better than the best teams in the league.  You WILL see that this team, no matter what pieces are added in the offseason, will continue to underperform with Bryce Young (barring significant improvement and consistency) at QB. 

The easiest way to look at it... It's utterly delusional to suggest that if we had someone like Josh Allen or Lamar Jackson at QB that we wouldn't have been demolishing our competition throughout the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

 

The easiest way to look at it... It's utterly delusional to suggest that if we had someone like Josh Allen or Lamar Jackson at QB that we wouldn't have been demolishing our competition throughout the season.

That seems more likely to be true than not true. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His lows far outweigh his highs so far volume wise.  He's had like 5-7 legit/truly solid games in his career out of 46. 

His highs have shown some respectable play that would be worthy of a 1st round pick.  His lows are UDFA lows.  And the bulk of it is very inconsistent below-average play that is difficult to watch.

We've seen some slightly elevated play, more consistently as of late, but it's not yet enough to give a full contract to.

I totally get giving him the 5th year.  

But this org absolutely has be patient and see how 2026 rolls out.  He's not in position to demand some shiny new contract yet so we can obviously wait and see, watch until guys like CJ get their cut and how Bryce plays a bit more.

There is absolutely not enough to go off and rush this process.  If Tepper/Morgan are claiming to have learned and are willing to be patient, then they need to exercise patience with a 2nd contract.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't see who voted what? I could have sworn you could in the past. I want to block the 6 people that voted 1-2 because those people are clearly trolls or are the dumbest humans alive and I would like to never interact with someone that ignorant.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...