Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

For the Cap gurus..


Recommended Posts

I expect the same strategy as we did last year. 3 year deals for guys around 25 to 28 years old and have the cap number be lower in 2026 and back load the contracts for 2027 and 2028 when our cap space is 100 million in 2027 and 360 million in 2028. With the years of terrible drafting this team had under Rhule and Fitterer and the lack of picks from all the panic QB trades has made it where we have few long-term contract commitments on the roster. 

I'm sure there's probably some restructures and cuts we can make to give ourselves some more room this year if we need it but overall, our cap situation is in a good spot under Dan and Brandt. 

I think we'll be pretty big spenders again this year. With us making the playoffs and being in a weak division I see Morgan being pretty aggressive this offseason.   

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the approach Morgan takes in free agency where we fill holes with at least serviceable players and use the draft for BPA. So, I expect us to bring in a Safety, 1 really good LB and 1 kinda so so vet LB in case they lose faith in Wallace, an edge rusher, and with ickey's injury I think we will be the team that overpays for a LT like Rasheed Walker with the plan to move him to RT depending on Ickey's health and how long Moton wants to play. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i read a lengthy article yesterday that basically explains it's very, very easy for us to have $75m in cap space without even counting a potential increase in the cap.  We are going to be able to add a lot of pieces this offseason, including multiple stars.  This forum is the most doom-and-gloom place on earth when it comes to the cap.  For some reason everyone on here is always under the assumption we can't rub two nickels together but it's simply not the case and rarely is.  We WILL lock up some big names this offseason.  Bank on it.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

i read a lengthy article yesterday that basically explains it's very, very easy for us to have $75m in cap space without even counting a potential increase in the cap.  We are going to be able to add a lot of pieces this offseason, including multiple stars.  This forum is the most doom-and-gloom place on earth when it comes to the cap.  For some reason everyone on here is always under the assumption we can't rub two nickels together but it's simply not the case and rarely is.  We WILL lock up some big names this offseason.  Bank on it.

could you link the article because this dude says we are tight with little leverage

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/postmortems-for-wild-card-round-losers/id1528622068?i=1000744963630

 

we are the first team they talk about, really good non biased talk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

could you link the article because this dude says we are tight with little leverage

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/postmortems-for-wild-card-round-losers/id1528622068?i=1000744963630

 

we are the first team they talk about, really good non biased talk

Theres an additional $25m in rollover cap that we will have, so we actually have $50m currently.  See link below

 

https://www.derp/carolina-panthers-analysis/57799/the-panthers-enter-the-2026-offseason-with-a-decent-amount-of-cap-space?utm_campaign=dhfacebook&utm_content=<media_url>&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CmC2k said:

I expect the same strategy as we did last year. 3 year deals for guys around 25 to 28 years old and have the cap number be lower in 2026 and back load the contracts for 2027 and 2028 when our cap space is 100 million in 2027 and 360 million in 2028. With the years of terrible drafting this team had under Rhule and Fitterer and the lack of picks from all the panic QB trades has made it where we have few long-term contract commitments on the roster. 

I'm sure there's probably some restructures and cuts we can make to give ourselves some more room this year if we need it but overall, our cap situation is in a good spot under Dan and Brandt. 

I think we'll be pretty big spenders again this year. With us making the playoffs and being in a weak division I see Morgan being pretty aggressive this offseason.   

I hope we don't get too aggressive and start the Matt Rhule "ALMOST THERE" BS. This is a very bad NFL roster with at least three good offseasons before it's a good roster. 

I really don't want to see more Wharton's or Robert Hunt's. Less of that, please.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

thanks

 

I get restructuring Horn and brown as they should be here for a long time but man at some point you got to bite the bullet with moton

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

I hope we don't get too aggressive and start the Matt Rhule "ALMOST THERE" BS. This is a very bad NFL roster with at least three good offseasons before it's a good roster. 

I really don't want to see more Wharton's or Robert Hunt's. Less of that, please.

Robert Hunt is a top 10 RG when he's healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It depends. The cap money is there if they want to go all in this year. We can restructure our most expensive players and also extend some of our upcoming free agents to clear a lot of room (if they want to). I imagine they will do this with a few guys, but not everyone, as it will put us in a bind beyond 2026.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, h0llywood said:

Robert Hunt is a top 10 RG when he's healthy.

 I should look that up. How much the top Gs make now, who they are… 
But good lord my reaction is for 100 million he better be. I would expect top 5 for that contract. His deal is two years in so not really cutting edge for the upcoming FA.

I am not dogging him, he is a good player and an asset but also I have seen him losing matchups, getting pushed around. In my cheapskate mind no 100 million dollar guard should be having that happen. 
 

I guess honestly I feel like we could do better for that money. At the same time 100 mil for any right guard is shocking to me, it is walk on water territory. 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
    • rippadonn likes him.  That might be a red flag.... https://x.com/rippadonn/status/2042310653176594854
×
×
  • Create New...