Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

For the Cap gurus..


 Share

Recommended Posts

I expect the same strategy as we did last year. 3 year deals for guys around 25 to 28 years old and have the cap number be lower in 2026 and back load the contracts for 2027 and 2028 when our cap space is 100 million in 2027 and 360 million in 2028. With the years of terrible drafting this team had under Rhule and Fitterer and the lack of picks from all the panic QB trades has made it where we have few long-term contract commitments on the roster. 

I'm sure there's probably some restructures and cuts we can make to give ourselves some more room this year if we need it but overall, our cap situation is in a good spot under Dan and Brandt. 

I think we'll be pretty big spenders again this year. With us making the playoffs and being in a weak division I see Morgan being pretty aggressive this offseason.   

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the approach Morgan takes in free agency where we fill holes with at least serviceable players and use the draft for BPA. So, I expect us to bring in a Safety, 1 really good LB and 1 kinda so so vet LB in case they lose faith in Wallace, an edge rusher, and with ickey's injury I think we will be the team that overpays for a LT like Rasheed Walker with the plan to move him to RT depending on Ickey's health and how long Moton wants to play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i read a lengthy article yesterday that basically explains it's very, very easy for us to have $75m in cap space without even counting a potential increase in the cap.  We are going to be able to add a lot of pieces this offseason, including multiple stars.  This forum is the most doom-and-gloom place on earth when it comes to the cap.  For some reason everyone on here is always under the assumption we can't rub two nickels together but it's simply not the case and rarely is.  We WILL lock up some big names this offseason.  Bank on it.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

i read a lengthy article yesterday that basically explains it's very, very easy for us to have $75m in cap space without even counting a potential increase in the cap.  We are going to be able to add a lot of pieces this offseason, including multiple stars.  This forum is the most doom-and-gloom place on earth when it comes to the cap.  For some reason everyone on here is always under the assumption we can't rub two nickels together but it's simply not the case and rarely is.  We WILL lock up some big names this offseason.  Bank on it.

could you link the article because this dude says we are tight with little leverage

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/postmortems-for-wild-card-round-losers/id1528622068?i=1000744963630

 

we are the first team they talk about, really good non biased talk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

could you link the article because this dude says we are tight with little leverage

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/postmortems-for-wild-card-round-losers/id1528622068?i=1000744963630

 

we are the first team they talk about, really good non biased talk

Theres an additional $25m in rollover cap that we will have, so we actually have $50m currently.  See link below

 

https://www.derp/carolina-panthers-analysis/57799/the-panthers-enter-the-2026-offseason-with-a-decent-amount-of-cap-space?utm_campaign=dhfacebook&utm_content=<media_url>&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CmC2k said:

I expect the same strategy as we did last year. 3 year deals for guys around 25 to 28 years old and have the cap number be lower in 2026 and back load the contracts for 2027 and 2028 when our cap space is 100 million in 2027 and 360 million in 2028. With the years of terrible drafting this team had under Rhule and Fitterer and the lack of picks from all the panic QB trades has made it where we have few long-term contract commitments on the roster. 

I'm sure there's probably some restructures and cuts we can make to give ourselves some more room this year if we need it but overall, our cap situation is in a good spot under Dan and Brandt. 

I think we'll be pretty big spenders again this year. With us making the playoffs and being in a weak division I see Morgan being pretty aggressive this offseason.   

I hope we don't get too aggressive and start the Matt Rhule "ALMOST THERE" BS. This is a very bad NFL roster with at least three good offseasons before it's a good roster. 

I really don't want to see more Wharton's or Robert Hunt's. Less of that, please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

thanks

 

I get restructuring Horn and brown as they should be here for a long time but man at some point you got to bite the bullet with moton

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

I hope we don't get too aggressive and start the Matt Rhule "ALMOST THERE" BS. This is a very bad NFL roster with at least three good offseasons before it's a good roster. 

I really don't want to see more Wharton's or Robert Hunt's. Less of that, please.

Robert Hunt is a top 10 RG when he's healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, h0llywood said:

Robert Hunt is a top 10 RG when he's healthy.

 I should look that up. How much the top Gs make now, who they are… 
But good lord my reaction is for 100 million he better be. I would expect top 5 for that contract. His deal is two years in so not really cutting edge for the upcoming FA.

I am not dogging him, he is a good player and an asset but also I have seen him losing matchups, getting pushed around. In my cheapskate mind no 100 million dollar guard should be having that happen. 
 

I guess honestly I feel like we could do better for that money. At the same time 100 mil for any right guard is shocking to me, it is walk on water territory. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Shīt happens. Extent Yoshi and draft another tackle. We can't make panic moves over it when we already have the highest amount of salary cap in the league dedicated to the OL. We need more pieces on defense bad. Bryce Young is about to get the 5th year option. He's going to have to begin getting used to us having to make sacrifices.
    • I don’t disagree but like with my opinion of Bryce what limitations he puts on the offense, and my strong suspicion that the playbook is thinner because of him, and the ripple effect that has overall, I don’t think Evero has been given the tools to make things work much better. Princely’s opinions notwithstanding.  Now, this 3rd down poo? Very disappointing. A good bit does fall on the players.     The poor tackling is a concern as well, I hate watching that stuff. Position coaches have some responsibility there too. And granted that is his cross to bear in that he put them in place and allowed the lack of attention to those details to exist. But how hard is it it to fuging wrap up?  I would fine players for the shoulder tackles. I hate that.    Before I send him to the trash heap, I want to give it one more draft and FA. 
    • The two people that voted for option 10 are probably Bryce Young's parents.
×
×
  • Create New...