Some homers' opinions of the OTs that we may realistically be able to get at 19

[TD alt]

With so many people who want OT or bust at 19, AI found it interesting to hear people who are in their respective corners so to speak. 

 

It's like I've been saying. We could take a tackle if the value is there, but it's not like OT is a given considering we are at 19. I'm all about getting an OT, but the juice has to be worth the squeeze. You know that Francis Mauigoa is going to be gone. Spencer Fano, mentioned in another thread, could very well be gone, and Monroe Freeling may be a pipedream as well. After that, as a fan, you really have to ask yourself if 19 is too rich to be drafting an OT. I'm not saying that it is or isn't (I'm just waiting for the draft), but I do know that certain receivers and maybe a couple of TEs, if still on the board could probably outrank Proctor, Miller and a few others. If we want one of the surer OTs, we just may have to move up, and I'm not necessarily a fan of doing that, but if Freeling falls, I might grin and bear it.

As a bonus, here is a ranking of position groups by talent in this year's draft according to Lance Zierlein to offer even more insight and maybe perspective.

https://www.nfl.com/news/ranking-11-position-groups-in-2026-nfl-draft-from-strongest-to-weakest-edge-rusher-linebacker-loaded

 

[csx]

Let's draft based on a content creators list and forget about any basic understanding of football.

[jfra78]

There's a lot of ways we could go and i will probably be happy

[Swaggasaurus]

I’d feel ok if we take Mauigoa, Freeling, or Proctor at 19. I’m not down with either Utah player, but via  trade back or 51 I’d be ok with Lomu. I think he can get stronger. Power and lack there of translates.

[csx]

Which WRs are you referring to?

Proctor has a higher draft grade than Concepcion and equal to Tyson....the 3rd WR who's expected to be gone before we pick.