Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Drafting a QB #1 is a Smokescreen


riddel

Recommended Posts

IMHOP (free pancakes) the Panther's are letting the entire NFL know that they are looking for a franchise QB, so that the value of the #1 pick rises. If Arizona, Cincy, Washington, San Fran, ect. believe that the Panther's will use the #1 pick on a QB, then they are more inclined to trade up to the #1 spot.

First, and the funniest part is ESPN and the mock draft geeks aren't buying it. ESPN doesn't even show the Panther's as a team in need of a QB during their" Teams in need of a QB" segment. Why? Rivera has clearly stated it's our goal to find a franchise QB.

Second, Matt Moore was tendered. This is a huge deal and shouldn't be overlooked. You have to know that he accepts this tender and then the Panthers are going to have to keep him on the roster or cut him. Why tender Matt Moore? It really is baffling if you are going to draft a QB with the #1 pick.

Third, the Panther's are actively looking at FA Qbs. You have Clausen and now Moore, so why look at FA Qbs if you're going to draft a QB #1? Four QBs, plus Pike? What happens to Pike?

Fourth, Richardson said the Panthers intend to use the #1 pick, which indicated that Luck was "our" guy. Luck dropped us like a bad habit. There is not a QB that's even near Luck in this draft. If Richardson was so set on Luck that I don't see any other QB in this draft replacing that choice. Richardson wants to trade this pick now and the only way he can do it is to pressure teams that are desperate for one of the 2 top QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

let's start a smokescreen about needing a DT or RG next then....that will really throw teams off.

if the Panthers were going to throw a smokescreen they would be pimping Patrick Peterson or someone like that......telling the league they will ignore all their HUGE holes b/c this kid is just THAT good and rare of a talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

let's start a smokescreen about needing a DT or RG next then....that will really throw teams off.

if the Panthers were going to throw a smokescreen they would be pimping Patrick Peterson or someone like that......telling the league they will ignore all their HUGE holes b/c this kid is just THAT good and rare of a talent.

except no team would ever jump to the first pick to take a cb.....ever

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a chance we go into camp with FA/Moore/Clausen/Rookie and keep the rookie and the best other 2. I just highly doubt that.

I don't think it's really a smokescreen exactly, we DO need a QB, we just probably won't find it in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

let's start a smokescreen about needing a DT or RG next then....that will really throw teams off.

if the Panthers were going to throw a smokescreen they would be pimping Patrick Peterson or someone like that......telling the league they will ignore all their HUGE holes b/c this kid is just THAT good and rare of a talent.

I'm sure they are pimping every potential #1 pick that would be worth trading up for, but my point is, IMHOP (free pancakes), the Panther's have NO intentions of drafting a QB #1. The only reason the thought is in any one's head is because they are pimping their need for a franchise QB, which may or may not force one of the 2-10 teams to trade up and secure the #1 spot so that they don't miss out on one of the top 2 QBs. Almost every team in the top 10 picks needs a QB, so the Panthers are making it look like 1 of the top QBs will be gone, if a trade doesn't occur.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no team is going to trade up to number 1 for a QB, and the panthers aren't trying to fool anyone.

the fans and media are drooling over 2-3 QBs in the draft, but the fact of the matter is this draft is deep in quality QBs. so deep that a good one can be picked up as deep as the 3rd round. all of them have question marks, and all of them are projects. so what's the purpose of reaching for one first overall?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMHOP (free pancakes) the Panther's are letting the entire NFL know that they are looking for a franchise QB, so that the value of the #1 pick rises. If Arizona, Cincy, Washington, San Fran, ect. believe that the Panther's will use the #1 pick on a QB, then they are more inclined to trade up to the #1 spot.

First, and the funniest part is ESPN and the mock draft geeks aren't buying it. ESPN doesn't even show the Panther's as a team in need of a QB during their" Teams in need of a QB" segment. Why? Rivera has clearly stated it's our goal to find a franchise QB.

Second, Matt Moore was tendered. This is a huge deal and shouldn't be overlooked. You have to know that he accepts this tender and then the Panthers are going to have to keep him on the roster or cut him. Why tender Matt Moore? It really is baffling if you are going to draft a QB with the #1 pick.

Third, the Panther's are actively looking at FA Qbs. You have Clausen and now Moore, so why look at FA Qbs if you're going to draft a QB #1? Four QBs, plus Pike? What happens to Pike?

Fourth, Richardson said the Panthers intend to use the #1 pick, which indicated that Luck was "our" guy. Luck dropped us like a bad habit. There is not a QB that's even near Luck in this draft. If Richardson was so set on Luck that I don't see any other QB in this draft replacing that choice. Richardson wants to trade this pick now and the only way he can do it is to pressure teams that are desperate for one of the 2 top QBs.

First of all.... you could be EXACTLY right. This isn't outside the realm of possibility.

But Moore being tendered may be a signal that we are going to draft a QB. No matter who we draft at QB he is going to need time to transition and will likely sit for as long as possible.

By tendering Matt you avoid having to sign a vet QB from FA that would likely demand a multiple year contract. If you draft a QB you can develop him for a year and move him on up the depth chart after the year when you let Matt walk.

If you draft a QB, have Clausen under contract 3 more years, and sign a vet FA to a multi year contract you may bury your draft pick behind these guys for longer than you want to or cause a divide in the locker room if Clausen or vet is playing well and you want to start your draft pick.

So the fact we tendered Matt could mean exactly what you said or the complete opposite so it is hard to read too much into that.

I'm not sure what FA QB we have talked to but they are looking at the market bc we probably aren't even sure we are going to do on draft day yet. If we don't draft a QB they may still look to FA to try and shore up the QB position.

And the trading down to a team desperate for a QB always sounds nice except when you think about it, WE are desperate for a QB. And if turns out that there is a QB worth the pick it would take a ton of picks to get us off the guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure they are pimping every potential #1 pick that would be worth trading up for, but my point is, IMHOP (free pancakes), the Panther's have NO intentions of drafting a QB #1. The only reason the thought is in any one's head is because they are pimping their need for a franchise QB, which may or may not force one of the 2-10 teams to trade up and secure the #1 spot so that they don't miss out on one of the top 2 QBs. Almost every team in the top 10 picks needs a QB, so the Panthers are making it look like 1 of the top QBs will be gone, if a trade doesn't occur.

If they think a QB is worth being drafted in the top 5.....then imo they have legitimate thought of drafting one #1 overall. It is too big a hole for Carolina and the position has too big of an impact on literallly everyone else on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No not yet. But if he doesn't don't we still own rights to him. For instance can he not sign and walk into FA?? I don't think he can. I think his options are sign the tender or don't to try to get a better deal but I don't think he can just walk.

Someone correct me if I am wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about this does nobody seem to understand? "smokescreens" don't work when you have the number one overall pick. Why would a team trade up WITH us in order to PICK the player WE made them think WE really wanted????

A successful "smokescreen" only really works when want a particular player to fall to you. For example you tell people you want player A so everyone ahead of you knows that player A won't go past your position. This makes them not consider player B who you actually want.

Also, why would we start a "smokescreen", however unrealistic, two months before the draft? No pro days, no personal interviews...come on guys. This isn't a conspiracy...it's not a ploy...the Panthers need a QB and are looking at newton and gabbert. That's it...nothing more nothing less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you are an athlete or former athlete (myself?  Cornhole 2021-present; Disc Golf 2013-got a mega blister and had to retire; speed walking--every black Friday at Walmart 2003-2009) you know what it is to lose confidence.  Self-inflicted or not (in my view, a lot of 2023 was coaching and a lot of 2024 was confidence), he has confidence now. How fragile is it?  I think the light is on, the game slowed down, and he is ready to do his thing.  He seems to be "mobile in the pocket" instead of "running scared."   Last year, there were times when AT was out, Johnson gone, and all he really had was XL and Coker--a raw rookie with upside and an UDFA rookie.  TE was rarely a viable option. It reminded me of Benjamin and Funchess.   Moore had to step up.  This season, Bryce has weapons.  I expect XL to improve.  I expect TMac to help tremendously, and I think Coker will be solid.  Renfrow?  Horn?  bonuses.    
    • His points are valid.  However, it seems a bit based on past performance and fails to take into consideration trends and conditions that might suggest growth in 2025.   For one, he breaks the team down by position and ranks them separately.  I guess that is a fair way to do it, but they are dependent upon each other. Last year, our DL sucked.  That impacts the rest of the defense.  With no internal pressure, the QBs simply step up to avoid the Edge rush.  I would have suggested that the internal DL is now featuring pass rushers and large people who can collapse the pocket.  Secondly, the LBs were not protected very well in 2024.  It is hard to see the holes and step up when a guard is in your earhole a second after the snap.  Finally, the defensive backs will be forced to make fewer tackles and they will be better in pass protection with a new and improved DL.    Canales made an interesting comment the other day, and I (from the outside looking in) feel the same way:  (paraphrasing) "I have never seen a better group of rookies."   I think the biggest concern is the learning curve.  How long before these rookies are ready?   I am bullish on this team.  I think they win 3 of their first 4 and get confident.  The get the fans behind them.  From there, they win 6 of the remaining 13.  If they stay injury free, they have an outside shot at the NFC south.     
    • Biiiiiig eyeroll on this.  First, Look at historical stats of the most recent historical great DBs.  I plucked 3, Revis, Sherman, and Norman (cuzz he was our guy).  Combined post age 30, there are TWO pro bowls between those 3 and wanna get this...ZERO seasons with 16 games started.  ALL missed time.  It is RARE that Corners survive that long in the NFL and its about time we started recognizing this fact.  Jaycee is a good bet because it hasnt been anything seriously devastating injury wise, and with his sample size he could and should be an incredible piece for the panthers through age 30. Jaire kinda flops on the other side, hes 28...so hes under 30, but he wants his payday before it comes up, hes also been injury prone lately.  Bulk of the contract will be on opposite side of 30.  Will both of these guys help us be better in 2026?  SURE!  No doubt, but the question is, will these guys help us past 2026...not sure. The investment isnt worth the risk, nor would the ROI be anywhere close to worth it.  Neither guy is moving us from a 6-8 win team to a 8-10 team, period. My point is we're in this state a 6-8 win team IMO and he projects us as  a 4-6 win team.  EVEN if we think Jaire or Ramsey will make us a 6-8 win team, it in NO WAY is worth the money or capital to move that much just to suck kinda less.  
×
×
  • Create New...