Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

FTM analysis of Cam


teeray

Recommended Posts

What I really don't like about this guy's analysis is that there's so much he doesn't tell you about, and so much that has to be subjective. He needs to publish his analytical techniques before he touts them, IMHO

He did. There is a link in the first paragraph.

This is excellent analysis. He has developed a mathematical formula to produce unbiased rankings of college recruits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont see why some live and die by wonderlic scores. Jimmy Clausen scored a 23 and Terry Bradshaw scored a 15. Ryan Fitzpatrick scored a 48. The average superbowl winner scored a 30, that's 30 out of 50. Honestly a 20-30 score shouldnt impress. A 30 is 60% and if you,ve ever taken a test 60% isn't good.

To base a QB's success rate on a test that ask nothing about football like reading defenses, audibles, etc. is kinda dumb. Peyton Manning scored a 28 and Alex Smith scored a 40, so what's the point? A player should be judged by what they do on the field not how well they do taxes.

Wonderlics are like IQ scores, if all things are equal then they can make a diiference. But they hardly should be a big piece of the puzzle unless we are deciding who joins the Menza club.

There are many folks who are very bright who are not nearly as successful as others who may have average or below average IQ but who are hard workers for example.

It should be included since it does measure your ability to problem solve and use critical thinking which is important to the quarterback position. However it is far from rocket science.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Read it again. With an average Wonderlic, he is in the elite category. A low score drops him to The Golden Calf of Bristol range.

I don't put much stock in these sorts of analyses, but lets report accurately what it said.

I just read it again and it said with a good score he could shed the The Golden Calf of Bristol/VY comparisons. He kind of says two different things. One that he's ahead of them with an average score and the other that he needs a good score to be ahead of them.

I stand corrected, somewhat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Read it again. With an average Wonderlic, he is in the elite category. A low score drops him to The Golden Calf of Bristol range.

I don't put much stock in these sorts of analyses, but lets report accurately what it said.

Stats and TheRealDeal mix like water and grease, shyt and piss, Dogs and Cats.

You catch my drift.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was pretty sloppy. It basically boils down to he doesn't like VY and thinks The Golden Calf of Bristol is a bust already for no reason. VY busted because he's lazy and entitled anyway not because hes an idiot or couldn't throw a football.

The tape tells us Cam is accurate on the deep ball and has great arm strength. The stats show he can beat top competition when the run is schemed away from him. Another thing that annoys me is this out of hand dismissal of his running. A big chubby stiff like Ben can take away Clay Mathews on the pass rush because he needs to be spied. Cam is built like Adonis and could out run Jon Beason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wonderlics are like IQ scores, if all things are equal then they can make a diiference. But they hardly should be a big piece of the puzzle unless we are deciding who joins the Menza club.

There are many folks who are very bright who are not nearly as successful as others who may have average or below average IQ but who are hard workers for example.

It should be included since it does measure your ability to problem solve and use critical thinking which is important to the quarterback position. However it is far from rocket science.

Critical thinking is important, but most of these guys have been playing organized football since age 5. Most of them know and study football way more than any other subject in school. I think the wonderlic doesnt really prove anything besides basic IQ and has nothing to do with football IQ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can fully believe part of the reason VY busted is how stupid he is. His stupidity is tied in with his immaturity which was a big factor in his bust.

That was pretty sloppy. It basically boils down to he doesn't like VY and thinks The Golden Calf of Bristol is a bust already for no reason. VY busted because he's lazy and entitled anyway not because hes an idiot or couldn't throw a football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just read it again and it said with a good score he could shed the The Golden Calf of Bristol/VY comparisons. He kind of says two different things. One that he's ahead of them with an average score and the other that he needs a good score to be ahead of them.

I stand corrected, somewhat.

Agree that its confusing. The actual score was .889, putting him in the elite category. In his write-up, he apparently assumes the Wonderlic will come out low, dropping him to The Golden Calf of Bristol land.

I think the guy is trying to cover all the bases, so he can come back next year and say, "See...I was right!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am torn on this piece of analysis. What this should be is Cam Newton showing a lot of promise when placed in this algorithm. The author said that he's aiming to reject the biases with a scientific method. Why the fug does he have to bring up Vince Young then? I am by no means a Newton nut-hugger, I just want to be fair. In this case, Newton in all fairness should've received high praise. Why does he have to be so negative, so biased, when his own system says otherwise? Why does he even start writing this article with the thought of 'exposing' Cam? Thanks R.C. Fisher, you've shown me something insightful about Cam. Sadly for you, it's not what your biased ass wants us to believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am torn on this piece of analysis. What this should be is Cam Newton showing a lot of promise when placed in this algorithm. The author said that he's aiming to reject the biases with a scientific method. Why the fug does he have to bring up Vince Young then? I am by no means a Newton nut-hugger, I just want to be fair. In this case, Newton in all fairness should've received high praise. Why does he have to be so negative, so biased, when his own system says otherwise? Why does he even start writing this article with the thought of 'exposing' Cam? Thanks R.C. Fisher, you've shown me something insightful about Cam. Sadly for you, it's not what your biased ass wants us to believe.

I also find it telling that his formula contains some secret factors that he won't divulge for commercial reasons. There are ways for him to protect his work without secrecy, but this approach allows him to inject his bias at will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am torn on this piece of analysis. What this should be is Cam Newton showing a lot of promise when placed in this algorithm. The author said that he's aiming to reject the biases with a scientific method. Why the fug does he have to bring up Vince Young then? I am by no means a Newton nut-hugger, I just want to be fair. In this case, Newton in all fairness should've received high praise. Why does he have to be so negative, so biased, when his own system says otherwise? Why does he even start writing this article with the thought of 'exposing' Cam? Thanks R.C. Fisher, you've shown me something insightful about Cam. Sadly for you, it's not what your biased ass wants us to believe.

He is pretty harsh on all the QBs, however you need to read further.

In his methodology he clearly states that QBs with a score above .85 are likely solid NFL QBs. The formula says that Cam should be a great QB. And he admits that. His numbers are great, if not spectacular.

Then he does an opinion piece, less formulaic, saying that Cam may a QB that proves the formula wrong. And gives a bunch of good reasons. Vince young is hardly a terrible QB, but this guy obviously hates him

But he makes good points. Vince is the best QB in the past 5 years to be drafted with a wonderlic less than 24. If Cam newton does less than 24 on the wonderlic, why is he better than Vince? His stats are nearly identical.

If you want to summarize the article: Dumb running QBs with great passing ability aren't elite

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...