Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Statistical Analyses of Newton and Gabbert


Ricky Spanish

Recommended Posts

Newton:

http://fantasyfootballmetrics.com/Player_News/2011/NFL%20Draft/NFL%20Draft_2011_Newton_2-24-2011.htm

Gabbert:

http://fantasyfootballmetrics.com/Player_News/Content/NFL-Draft_2011_Gabbert_2-17-2011.htm

I find what these guys do incredibly interesting. they use math and statistics from previous players in college to compare the probably of success in prospects this year. they have stats on everything, it's actually pretty cool. they run numbers every which way to try and find the best way to predict who will bust and who won't.

for those who don't care to read, Newton compares to Vince Young statistically speaking from his last year in college. they say that if his wownderlic is above 25, he can be great. if it is 24 or below, he will most likely suck.

Gabbert, they say, is most likely going to bust.

I'm now on the draft Patrick Peterson bandwagon folks.

Oh and here is the mathematical formula that they use and junk:

http://www.fantasyfootballmetrics.com/Player_News/Content/QB_College-QB-Vers1.0_2-17-2011.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Give me a break with this guy.

He, by his own admission, tried to create a statistical predictor based on current top six NFL QBs. First of all, that is far to small of a pool to create any sort of reliable statistical analysis. Secondly, while it may be possible to predict whether a QB will have success coming out of college, I would argue that it would be absolutely impossible to predict who will become a HOF caliber QB. (Brady and Manning are 1st ballot, Big Ben and Brees are 1 more ring away and Rodgers and Rivers are on the track towards it.) If he wanted an accurate predictor, why not use the pro bowl QBs from the past 5-10 years?

Then you get to his results, his list of QBs who had “'bust' or never make it potential" coming out of college includes 9 entrenched starting QBs in the NFL.

18. Matt Stafford

20. Matt Ryan*

23. Eli Manning*

29. Josh Freeman

30. Donovan McNabb*

35. Tony Romo*

37. Jay Cutler*

54. Kyle Orton

57. David Garrard*

* Pro Bowl QBs

Not to mention, based on his rankings...

Beck

Leaf

Couch

Carr

Harrington

Jawalrus

Leinart

...all should have had more successful careers than...

Josh Freeman

Donovan McNabb

Tony Romo

Jay Cutler

Kyle Orton

David Garrard

I think I'll pass on this guys system for evaluation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Newton:

http://fantasyfootballmetrics.com/Player_News/2011/NFL%20Draft/NFL%20Draft_2011_Newton_2-24-2011.htm

Gabbert:

http://fantasyfootballmetrics.com/Player_News/Content/NFL-Draft_2011_Gabbert_2-17-2011.htm

I find what these guys do incredibly interesting. they use math and statistics from previous players in college to compare the probably of success in prospects this year. they have stats on everything, it's actually pretty cool. they run numbers every which way to try and find the best way to predict who will bust and who won't.

for those who don't care to read, Newton compares to Vince Young statistically speaking from his last year in college. they say that if his wownderlic is above 25, he can be great. if it is 24 or below, he will most likely suck.

Gabbert, they say, is most likely going to bust.

I'm now on the draft Patrick Peterson bandwagon folks.

We went over this a couple of weeks ago. Read it again. He equates Newton to Young given the assumption that Newton is below average on the Wonderlic.

With an average score on the Wonderlic, he would rate a .89 which puts him miles above Young given his system.

An above average score on the Wonderlic would put him with the elite QB's.

I don't put a lot of stock in his system, but let's at least get the facts straight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We went over this a couple of weeks ago. Read it again. He equates Newton to Young given the assumption that Newton is below average on the Wonderlic.

With an average score on the Wonderlic, he would rate a .89 which puts him miles above Young given his system.

An above average score on the Wonderlic would put him with the elite QB's.

I don't put a lot of stock in his system, but let's at least get the facts straight.

That isn't what he said at all.

His comparison to Young was purely based on their passing outputs, nothing to do with the wonderlic. He actually presumed Newton will get a 'good' or 'great' score and that is what has put him as a better prospect than Young.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMHO, All these comparisons to Vince Young are not a bad thing as long as its not saying Cam has his attitude or brains. Vince would be a great QB if he just didn't have his attitude issues and he wasn't dumb as a brick (scored 7 on the wonderlic I think).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Give me a break with this guy.

He, by his own admission, tried to create a statistical predictor based on current top six NFL QBs. First of all, that is far to small of a pool to create any sort of reliable statistical analysis. Secondly, while it may be possible to predict whether a QB will have success coming out of college, I would argue that it would be absolutely impossible to predict who will become a HOF caliber QB. (Brady and Manning are 1st ballot, Big Ben and Brees are 1 more ring away and Rodgers and Rivers are on the track towards it.) If he wanted an accurate predictor, why not use the pro bowl QBs from the past 5-10 years?

Then you get to his results, his list of QBs who had “'bust' or never make it potential" coming out of college includes 9 entrenched starting QBs in the NFL.

18. Matt Stafford

20. Matt Ryan*

23. Eli Manning*

29. Josh Freeman

30. Donovan McNabb*

35. Tony Romo*

37. Jay Cutler*

54. Kyle Orton

57. David Garrard*

* Pro Bowl QBs

Not to mention, based on his rankings...

Beck

Leaf

Couch

Carr

Harrington

Jawalrus

Leinart

...all should have had more successful careers than...

Josh Freeman

Donovan McNabb

Tony Romo

Jay Cutler

Kyle Orton

David Garrard

I think I'll pass on this guys system for evaluation.

Out of all those guys how many have one a Super Bowl. Mcnabb is the only one who has even been to a SB.

In his top 13 the QB's have a combined 9 SB rings. And his scale only went back to 98 with Manning/Leaf so 9 of the last 12 SB winners are in his top 13.

His system is not perfect he said so his self, but it is fairly accurate. I mean most GM's would kill to have a 70% success rate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That isn't what he said at all.

His comparison to Young was purely based on their passing outputs, nothing to do with the wonderlic. He actually presumed Newton will get a 'good' or 'great' score and that is what has put him as a better prospect than Young.

The following is directly from the site.

Cam Newton Overall Score = 0.889 (see historical rating chart via link below)

Predicting the Unpredictable…Projecting a College QB to the NFL with a Mathematical Formula

Currently Newton is above our "magic" 0.850 score, projecting to a good/great NFL QB potentially. Again, that is with a average Wonderlic score plugged in. If Newton produces a bad Wonderlic score, it will throw him down to just another exciting college QB -- like it did to Vince Young in our system and (to a lesser degree) The Golden Calf of Bristol. An above average score is going to keep Newton with the high quality group.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...