Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Doesn't matter who at #1, Moore/Clausen/Vet will start


Recommended Posts

not when the "best case" isn't a realistic possiblity. I mean, best case would be for Tony Pike to tear it up and start and we trade a 6th rounder for a 2nd the following year....but Tony starting this season with Cam drafted #1 overall isnt' realistic.

and if pike blew it up, why would you trade him? i think thats why there is no need to have another rookie qb. we already have projects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think it's more realistic possibility that pike starts because cam isn't going to be a panther.

biggest need is by far QB.

it is rare for a team to get a chance a QB with Cam's upside/potential

The claim Carolina only employs squeeky clean guys is poo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

biggest need is by far QB.

it is rare for a team to get a chance a QB with Cam's upside/potential

The claim Carolina only employs squeeky clean guys is poo.

i see what you are saying, i really do. but there's no way to tell if cam will even pan out. it's all a guess and there is no other way to look at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

biggest need is by far QB.

it is rare for a team to get a chance a QB with Cam's upside/potential

The claim Carolina only employs squeeky clean guys is poo.

Newton has potential, yes. But his mechanics are questionable. He has great arm strength, but his accuracy isn't up to par. Some scouts believe he needs to change his throwing mechanics or it will cause him injuries down the road.

The offense he came from is questionable, along with only starting for 1 year in Division I football.

Newton's character issues are something you can't look past, but that's not all, from what has been put out there, he comes off as an immature kid that's selfish and disobedient.

I wouldn't mind Newton at all if he had at least 2 years experience, better mechanics, had experience in an offense with drop backs (preferably Pro style), and I wouldn't look past the character concerns, but that wouldn't play as big of a role in my decision making.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What experience do you gain by sitting on the bench watching terrible quarterbacks?

How do you prepare yourself by riding the plywood come Sunday?

Why don't you ask Carson Palmer while he sat and watched Jon Kitna.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't predict how fast a kid will be ready to go. For Cam and Gabbert it might take a year or it might take 3 games.

You just don't know. Nobody does.

I will agree with CCB that we need to have options for next year. Likely Moore and Clausen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...