Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mark Murphy, Jerry Richardson make pitch to retired player


eViL jEsTeR

Recommended Posts

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/mark-murphy-jerry-richardson-make-pitch-to-retired-players/

A couple of weeks ago, Commissioner Roger Goodell sent a letter to all players regarding the offer that the NFLPA* left on the table. It went over like a lead balloon. Coated in tungsten steel. Tied to a big-ass anchor.

Now, Packers president and CEO Mark Murphy and Panthers owner Jerry Richardson, both former NFL players, have penned a letter to all retired players.

What is next? Richardson hires a physic to make contact with deceased players? He pays visits to pee wee leagues around the nation to get them on board?

Maybe I missed the point of a VERY long article.... or maybe I am beginning to believe JR is half a nut job.

I did like reading about some of the bullet points they claim was in their proposal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Richardson is a former player I'm sure he gives a damn. He certainly cares about the little people at the stadium. Even though he's a self made multi-millionaire I doubt he's as stone cold as he's painted out to be. Yeah he wants to make money but he's not looking to leave anybody out in the cold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a shrewd move. If they can get the retired players on their side they will have a large upper hand in the PR department at the very least. It would also be compelling testimony to have a former player on your side to get someone who is not an owner talking up the owners proposal.

Hard for NFLPA to say it is the worst deal in the history of sports if former players are talking about it being a really good deal. Undermines the NFLPA*'s credibility. From a strategy point of view I like it a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a shrewd move. If they can get the retired players on their side they will have a large upper hand in the PR department at the very least. It would also be compelling testimony to have a former player on your side to get someone who is not an owner talking up the owners proposal.

Hard for NFLPA to say it is the worst deal in the history of sports if former players are talking about it being a really good deal. Undermines the NFLPA*'s credibility. From a strategy point of view I like it a lot.

The NFLPA disrespected and treated like poo the retired players rep just a week or two ago which didn't go over well.

The fans supporting the players need to understand they dont give a poo about former players or anyone that has built this game into what it is today. They just want to get theirs and fug everyone else.

I really hope the judge bends them over hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/mark-murphy-jerry-richardson-make-pitch-to-retired-players/

What is next? Richardson hires a physic to make contact with deceased players? He pays visits to pee wee leagues around the nation to get them on board?

Maybe I missed the point of a VERY long article.... or maybe I am beginning to believe JR is half a nut job.

I did like reading about some of the bullet points they claim was in their proposal.

Your ignorant hate of JR is pathetic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given that the retired players have sued the NFL in the same kind of suit as the NFLPA based on antitrust grounds, the owners are simply going through the motions of inclluding them in on their negotiations. The general thinking iis that because the retired players are not members of the NFLPA, their suit may have more merit than the Players do at this point.

Richardson is looking down the road and this letter is actually proof that he is far from senile. This is a scripted attempt to include the retired players in all this and mitigate some of the lawsuit issues.

http://www.carolinahuddle.com/forum/carolina-panthers/59062-brady-vs-nfl-what-you-need-to-know.html

The retired players lawsuit is close to the bottom of the long article.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given that the retired players have sued the NFL in the same kind of suit as the NFLPA based on antitrust grounds, the owners are simply going through the motions of inclluding them in on their negotiations. The general thinking iis that because the retired players are not members of the NFLPA, their suit may have more merit than the Players do at this point.

Richardson is looking down the road and this letter is actually proof that he is far from senile. This is a scripted attempt to include the retired players in all this and mitigate some of the lawsuit issues.

http://www.carolinahuddle.com/forum/carolina-panthers/59062-brady-vs-nfl-what-you-need-to-know.html

The retired players lawsuit is close to the bottom of the long article.

I think Richardson and Murphy's letter is setting the stage for the owners and the NFL Alumni to stripe the NFLPA of their bargaining repersentation of past and future players and the "other lawsuite" is a part of the setup. Not only is that lawsuite as damaging to the NFL, it's that damaging to the NFLPA. The NFL Alumni can ask the judge to give them their own bargaining powers since the NFLPA is no longer the NFLPA.

This would mean that the NFL Alumni would then represent all players (past, present and future). It's a shrud move but if a union isn't currently active, another one, made of mostly of retired players, can come in and take it's place. At least that is my understanding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it funny that the NFL gives most of the money it takes from fines to the retired players yet they still want to bite the hand that feeds them. What has the NFLPA done for retired players you ask? Told them they dont Rep Retired players and thats it....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Richardson didn't write the letter...I'm certain he simply drew a couple of pictures on a sheet of paper and pointed at the pictures and explained that he and the owners are all on the same page as that picture. Editors removed the "Michelle Beadle is hot" references.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’ve haven’t seen anything that says we have interest in Njoku?
    • I think the Njoku interest revealed intent and the type of TE they want.  I really expected more from Sanders.
    • Defensive tackle (or end in a 3-4 base) is suddenly a rather significant need.  It seems to be a forbidden topic on the Huddle.  Well I am going to unforbidden it for this thread. When we lost Robinson, it was a salary cap cutting move, saving us about $9m or so, I think.  That suggests that we are going to get cheaper, younger, and maybe, more multi-dimensional.  First, what did we lose in Robinson: (Charlotte Observer)  "Robinson co-led the team in sacks (5.5) in 2024, and he ranked second among Carolina linemen, behind Brown, in sacks (2.5) in 2025. (Derrick) Brown played on 76.4% of the Panthers’ defensive snaps last year, while Robinson played on 62.2% of those reps. No other defensive lineman played more than 38.3%, as free-agent addition, Turk Wharton, dealt with injuries throughout his first season in Carolina. Wharton played in just nine games, producing 36 total tackles and two sacks. He’s guaranteed $14 million this upcoming season. Read more at: https://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/nfl/carolina-panthers/article314544998.html#storylink=cpy OK, about Turk Wharton.  The Observer claims that he and Bobby Brown III were to rotate into the Robinson DE position, but that is too weird for my head to comprehend.  First, Brown III is a NT by trade and Wharton weighs about 280 lbs and is not stout vs. the run.  Brown III is not going to provide the internal pass pressure; he is basically designed to take on double teams and dig in.  Wharton, on the other hand, had a PFF score in those 9 games of 40 or so.  In fairness, he was playing with injuries, but Damn.  PFF gives me a higher rating at the Golden Corral buffet.  In other words, we need a true DT who can fill the two thirds of snaps that we just released.  We can't count on Turk and Brown III is not the answer.  Cam Jackson?  Same as Brown.  Have your people do what they do best.  Furthermore, Derrick Brown probably should limit his snaps.  Playing more than 3/4 of the snaps is hard on the body.  A tired player in the trenches is more prone to lower-body injuries. We need a player who can give Derrick Brown some relief and play opposite him as well.  Turk can rotate in but he needs to shoot gaps and give Guards and tackles fits--a change of pace.   I have to think we are going to draft DT much sooner than most Huddlers realize.  My favorite, you didn't ask? Probable second-rounder Gracen Halton (No. 59 overall, according to ESPN's March 2026 update). Once considered a Day 3 sleeper, his 2026 NFL draft stock has exploded into Round 2 or 3 due to elite interior pass-rush metrics.  Projected Round: 2 (Early to Mid) Key Traits: Elite explosive, quickness, 12.2%+ pass-rush win rate, and positional versatility to play inside on passing downs. Combine Highlights: Led defensive tackles in the vertical jump (36.5”) and broad jump, per Sports Illustrated. Draft Stock: Rising fast due to consistent 2025 production (7 tackles for loss) and a "freak show" combine performance, according to Stormin in Norman.  Halton is considered a high-motor playmaker and a potential Day 2 standout, notes   I would not be surprised to see DT on day 2.  
×
×
  • Create New...