Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gabbert = Dilfer


Zod

Recommended Posts

But is he accurate when he throws said receiver? That's the real question

It's not how far you can throw the receiver, because some of the greats can't throw receivers very far at all, but when you throw the receiver to the other receiver, does the other receiver have a chance at making a play on said receiver?

Honestly it won't matter. With Cam's strength, he can carry his receivers all the way. I mean, he did it in college!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Therefore, Newton > Gabbert because Gabbert's weakness/flaw is far greater than the sum total of Cam's.

Cam has incredible accuracy and all who deny it are haters.

<10 games to crucify Clausen and <15 college games to declare Newton the messiah. You guys are good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We sure are. Best part about being us? If next year Clausen looks good, we've supported him all along. If Newton looks bad, we knew he was a bust from day one.

This is the Huddle. We always knew what was real was real. It was what it was and it is what it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But is he accurate when he throws said receiver? That's the real question

It's not how far you can throw the receiver, because some of the greats can't throw receivers very far at all, but when you throw the receiver to the other receiver, does the other receiver have a chance at making a play on said receiver?

More importantly, how does the bus fit into this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a) both benefit being drafted top 10 in weak QB draft.

b) same size and mobility

b) both lack long ball ability

c) both have a name that can be used with a new meaning. You really dilfered that up , you dumb gabbert.

Case = Rested

That is a really weak attempt at a comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
    • Best part is if we draft him, we can also use him as our fourth and one QB sneaker
×
×
  • Create New...