Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFP asks if we're bluffing


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Are the Panthers bluffing?

So if it’s that obvious to a large portion of the NFL media that Newton is destined to wear Panther blue and black next season, then why is it the Panthers have yet to come out and officially say that he’s their guy?

Because maybe, just maybe, Carolina is currently engaged in the time-honored, pre-draft tradition of misinforming the NFL community in an attempt to accomplish a publicly unknown goal.

Think about it. The Panthers hold the first pick in a draft that is now less than two weeks away. Nobody can trade up to get ahead of them and steal the player they covet the most, so what’s the point of keeping their plans a secret?

Is it possible that after months of interviews, film study and due diligence the Panthers are still undecided on which player to draft?

Or, do they want everyone to think they’re targeting Cam Newton so that some other quarterback-starved team in love with the Heisman Trophy winner will pick up the phone, call general manager Marty Hurney and make him an offer he can’t refuse?

Remember, Carolina doesn’t have a second round pick in this year’s draft. After that first selection, Hurney and the Panthers won’t go on the clock again until the start of the third round. In addition, this is a team that went 2-14 last season and fired longtime head coach John Fox. New boss Ron Rivera won’t be expected to make the playoffs in 2011, so why not try to trade down, stockpile draft picks and begin the rebuilding process?

And if the Panthers’ goal is, in fact, to trade out of the top spot and acquire more selections, Newton would be the perfect poker hand to bluff with.

This is a league that puts a heavy premium on the quarterback position and Newton is considered by an overwhelming majority to be the top signal-caller available. Conservatively speaking, at least nine NFL teams (Arizona, Buffalo, Cincinnati, Minnesota, Oakland, Seattle, San Francisco, Tennessee and Washington) could be in the market for a quarterback. By bluffing on Newton, the Panthers are representing aces and making it known to the rest of the league that the quarterback supply is about to decrease, while demand remains at an all-time high.

I understand that Jimmy Clausen may not be the quarterback of the future in Carolina, but the guy only started ten games as a rookie for an offense that was seriously devoid of any legitimate firepower. Why not get the 2010 second round pick some weapons and give him another chance? Is it that ludicrous to think he may have some talent?

Let me be clear that this article deserves to fall under the classification of “conspiracy theory” rather than “fact.” The Panthers could very well pull the trigger on Newton come April 28, kick Clausen to the curb and look to address their other needs later in the draft.

But if Carolina is able to trade down, acquire more picks and successfully address other positions of concern (like DT and WR), this franchise will be taking a respectable first step towards being an NFC contender. This strategy may not garner the same excitement from the Carolina fan base that drafting Newton would, but St. Louis fans didn’t exactly set off fireworks in the streets when the team drafted offensive tackle Orlando Pace with the first selection back in 1997.

The writer himself acknowledges that he's spitballing here.

My opinion is still that the decision isn't made yet, and it's hard to smokescreen when you haven't actually made a choice.

But is it possible? Objectively, yeah.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Knowing how thorough Hurney is, I suspect he hasn't allow himself to make a decision yet... he's probably set a deadline for himself to make a decision that runs pretty close to 4/28.

It doesn't have to be a "one or the other" situation either, Hurney may decide to take Newton unless someone makes him an offer he can't refuse on a trade. I don't think Hurney will be so attached to drafting Newton or anyone else that he won't trade the pick if he thinks it's a better deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

deciding to stick with pickles is not the first step to becoming an NFC contender...that is the first step to mediocrity!

Deciding not to draft a quarterback at #1 doesn't equal sticking with Clausen.

There are other options.

and nobody knew the rams were taking bradford until the day of the draft so why is it hurney has to come out 2 weeks before the draft and declare who we are taking...this article was written by somebody who is just as bored as we are

Difference is he got paid for it.

I don't see a dime for posting here (cheap bastards) :mad:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...