Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will we ever be able to smell/feel/taste the internet?


hepcat

Recommended Posts

As humans begin to adjust to our decaying planet and we all eventually become cyborgs, will the internet provide an outlet to experience sensations of life in a virtual setting? Will you be able to escape to the digital world for hours, days, weeks on end with an endless amount of totally realistic experiences?

This sounds like something out of Brave New World, or the movie Inception - borderline Matrix. I don't think were that far away from it. I have this vision for the future where when a child is born, a chip is implanted in the brain that accesses the internet, which every human being is plugged into through their chip. We can all communicate without speaking, instantaneously, and access all the information in the world. We all live in a virtual society in our minds.

Seem possible? Scary? Is it really that farfetched?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As humans begin to adjust to our decaying planet and we all eventually become cyborgs, will the internet provide an outlet to experience sensations of life in a virtual setting? Will you be able to escape to the digital world for hours, days, weeks on end with an endless amount of totally realistic experiences?

This sounds like something out of Brave New World, or the movie Inception - borderline Matrix. I don't think were that far away from it. I have this vision for the future where when a child is born, a chip is implanted in the brain that accesses the internet, which every human being is plugged into through their chip. We can all communicate without speaking, instantaneously, and access all the information in the world. We all live in a virtual society in our minds.

Seem possible? Scary? Is it really that farfetched?

This thread stinks:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When they have real virtual sex (you know, like the holodeck on Star Trek), all other forms of communication will cease to exist... well, for men anyway.

If they ever came up with holodeck technology, everyone will not have a need to live in the "real world". They could just program up their fantasy world and never leave. Men would just sit their virtual pron star world and women would live in a virtual world filled with the ultimate kitchen appliances, irons, vacuums, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
×
×
  • Create New...