Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will Cam be coddled?


Recommended Posts

I hope Rivera is ALL OVER Cam Newton whenever they get to start practicing. Players always say that during camps and pre-season games, the game speed is nothing compared to the regular season.

That said, I hope Rivera gets that defense going full speed, makes our corners jam the WR's, and throw all kinds of blitzes at him. That is the only way he's going to learn. I think once we get him going against a full speed defense, then we'll know if he's really got that potential.

He looks good against air, and he looks good against college players. Here's to hoping he looks just as good against Mr. Beason & Co. this summer. :sifone:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He'll be coddled this year while he holds a clipboard on the sideline.

So, you think Cam sits this year, eh? What if things start falling apart ala 2010? Do we bring him in like we did Jimmy? No doubt the fans will be calling for him at that point...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As of right now, Cam gives us the best chance of winning. So unless the vet QB we bring in is Hasslebeck, Bulger, Volek, or even Matt Moore if we decide he is the guy, Cam is going to be starting week one if we want to win right now.

I wonder if Cam can handle being pushed hard to succeed. Here in the big leagues where we don't have perfect seasons, and will experience times of frustration, how will Cam react to this new world? I sensed in the Gruden camp episode, he got a little defensive about that one play in the national championship game where he refused to take a knee. He pull that with Rivera and he will likely get pulled from the game. So it will be interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think he will be given a pass from the coaching staff and treated like he's any different than other players. Since we annouced Rivera as coach I've read / watched everything I could find about him and he doesn't strike me as running that sort of ship.

A lot of our fans might give him a pass on poo but the coahces? Nah

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, you think Cam sits this year, eh? What if things start falling apart ala 2010? Do we bring him in like we did Jimmy? No doubt the fans will be calling for him at that point...

Yeah, but I honestly expect him to be third on the depth chart for a while behind whatever vet we bring in and :jc:

What the fans want really doesn't matter, if they don't think he's ready then he should continue to sit and learn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he will be used right away in certain plays designed for him specifically but sparingly from what I read. He just won't be the starter, a vet will be brought in. I agree he will be the 3rd in line to start behind Jimbo..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...