Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I'm on the Derek Anderson bandwagon....

SorthNarolina

By SorthNarolina,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

SorthNarolina Newbie

SorthNarolina

Posted
Posted

yes I am aware he is not very good.

But with Newton around we aren't going to sign a vet QB that really will separate himself from the pack. We can't fit the core, Newton, and a guy like Carson Palmer under the cap. It's not going to happen.

If we bring in a big name vet QB that is only a temporary solution that would result in losing a player that would be a long term answer. Anderson, Williams, even Johnson could be at risk. It might seem crazy to value a strong side backer over QB, but a placeholder QB isn't worth doo doo. I'd rather keep a long term solution over a short term even if it was a guy on ST.

Anderson has experience in Chud's system which will be gold if the lockout keeps going. He's the only QB I am aware of that played under Chud while he was an OC.

He did have the best year of his career there which doesn't hurt.

We're going to invest way too much into Newton to go after a good vet QB.

Anderson is the best answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
Posted

You have to bring in a solid vet that can play if necessary but know Newton is here to be our guy. That's not Derek Anderson...he reminds me of a Doug Johnson-type. We have plenty of cap to get a Hassleback, Alex Smith, Bulger, Tavaris Jackson, Bruce Gradkowski, Troy Smith all who have shown more potential as a solid career maybe late bloomer vet than Anderson imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MaineManPanther Newbie

MaineManPanther

Posted
Posted

Anderson might be the one QB who managed to play worse then Moore and Clausen.

There are QB options out there that wouldn't cost this team alot. (Collins, Gradkowski, Volek, Bulger)

I think what the FO is looking for, is a QB who can tutor but also consistenly assit in winning games. I don't see Anderson being that guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DaveThePanther2008 Grand Master

DaveThePanther2008

Posted
Posted

You have to bring in a solid vet that can play if necessary but know Newton is here to be our guy. That's not Derek Anderson...he reminds me of a Doug Johnson-type. We have plenty of cap to get a Hassleback, Alex Smith, Bulger, Tavaris Jackson, Bruce Gradkowski, Troy Smith all who have shown more potential as a solid career maybe late bloomer vet than Anderson imo.

Hasslelback is about one injury from the old folks home.

Alex Smith isn't even available and has more INTs then TD's.

Bulger might be a good fit. At least he went to ONE Pro Bowl.

Tavaris Jackson LMAO we could use A. Edwards and do better.

Gradkowski will not want come here. He is looking to start.

Troy Smith??? He has what 3 games experience on Newton. NO NO NO

Of all the names listed about you cannot give a justifiable reason over Derek Anderson. The guy went to the Pro Bowl in this same offense. Was it a fluke? IDK but what I do know other than Bulger (2004) and Hassleback (3x) none of the above names have been to the Pro Bowl

So if I had to choose, I would choose Anderson over Bulger because his Pro Bowl year will be with the same coach who got him the 1st one. I would choose Anderson over Hassleback because he has played in Chudz offense and Hassleback is one hit from putting Clausen in the game...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
Posted

Hasslelback is about one injury from the old folks home.

Alex Smith isn't even available and has more INTs then TD's.

Bulger might be a good fit. At least he went to ONE Pro Bowl.

Tavaris Jackson LMAO we could use A. Edwards and do better.

Gradkowski will not want come here. He is looking to start.

Troy Smith??? He has what 3 games experience on Newton. NO NO NO

Of all the names listed about you cannot give a justifiable reason over Derek Anderson. The guy went to the Pro Bowl in this same offense. Was it a fluke? IDK but what I do know other than Bulger (2004) and Hassleback (3x) none of the above names have been to the Pro Bowl

So if I had to choose, I would choose Anderson over Bulger because his Pro Bowl year will be with the same coach who got him the 1st one. I would choose Anderson over Hassleback because he has played in Chudz offense and Hassleback is one hit from putting Clausen in the game...

I mean this is a good point, but I just feel there's still better options. I'm not looking for someone to compete with Newton, but for a veteran to help him out in as many ways as possible and I question if Anderson is capable when compared to someone old like Hasselback or Bulger. Plus, I trust Clausen to develop into a capable backup if I'm also trusting this Shula/Chud staff to develop Cam into our franchise catapulting QB. Therefore, I believe more of the factors on the side of a filler behind Clausen that's a vet, but still has potential additionally. This is why I wouldn't mind a Troy Smith or Gradkowski. They'll find someone to basically be there if Clausen doesn't succeed if he needs somehow to go in...In the end, this situation is'nt entirely important; so I don't mind what happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SorthNarolina Newbie

SorthNarolina

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I mean this is a good point, but I just feel there's still better options. I'm not looking for someone to compete with Newton, but for a veteran to help him out in as many ways as possible and I question if Anderson is capable when compared to someone old like Hasselback or Bulger. Plus, I trust Clausen to develop into a capable backup if I'm also trusting this Shula/Chud staff to develop Cam into our franchise catapulting QB. Therefore, I believe more of the factors on the side of a filler behind Clausen that's a vet, but still has potential additionally. This is why I wouldn't mind a Troy Smith or Gradkowski. They'll find someone to basically be there if Clausen doesn't succeed if he needs somehow to go in...In the end, this situation is'nt entirely important; so I don't mind what happens.

Anderson isn't going to compete with Newton, he is the only QB with experience under Chud. He could land a sweet gig here as a backup and extend his career substantially.

We're setting up our offense to take pressure off newton. We can do that under Anderson. He would lessen the impact of the lockout.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Stroupe-a-loop Newbie

Stroupe-a-loop

Posted
Posted

If given a choice, I'd take Jake back.

Yeah if we're going to bring in some busted down quarterback physically take snaps until Newton is absolutely ready, I would greatly prefer Jake over an other broken down guy out there. At least watching him and Cam on the sideline would be kind of funny. Derek Anderson is terrible and isn't going to impart any wisdom on the rookie. Maybe Jake could even get Clausen to not seem like a tremendous douche.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DaveThePanther2008 Grand Master

DaveThePanther2008

Posted
Posted

Yeah if we're going to bring in some busted down quarterback physically take snaps until Newton is absolutely ready, I would greatly prefer Jake over an other broken down guy out there. At least watching him and Cam on the sideline would be kind of funny. Derek Anderson is terrible and isn't going to impart any wisdom on the rookie. Maybe Jake could even get Clausen to not seem like a tremendous douche.

So you are of the belief that Anderson's Pro Bowl season was a fluke? It had nothing to do with the offense he was in?

Jake was a great QB for us. Did a lot of great things for us. Ran this team and a couple years carried us further than we should have ever gone.

But bringing Jake back to mentor Cam in an offense he is unfamiliar with is not very wise. Anderson or Volek would be my choice just because of the familiarity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • frankw
      Bryce’s new look. He looks like a grown up

      By frankw · Posted

      Oh please with the wallowing in victimhood I'm going to take my ball and go home routine. You were just in here referring to people as super weird haters because they don't completely agree with your borderline delusional spin on what Bryce Young is and isn't as a fourth year starter. We can hope by some miracle that Bryce Young will actually be able to lead a formidable passing offense this season without being irrational homers and pretending verfiable data and what we have seen with our own two eyes doesn't tell us exactly what he has been to this point which is someone who moves the ball at a historically low rate.
    • OldhamA
      Vrabel and Russini? Athletic investigating.

      By OldhamA · Posted

      I am curious who's behind all of this though. A video and photos from years ago surfacing? Someone has a vendetta and is driving this PR campaign. I'm loving it, but I'd also like to know who said mystery figure is. 
    • strato
      Bryce’s new look. He looks like a grown up

      By strato · Posted

      I say positive things about Bryce when he earns them. Which he has a handful of times. It is all here and on the record but your lobby won’t focus on that or the flat out truth inside of our critical comments.  It is a constant thing with him and his backers - one or two good things and people are trying to extrapolate that to proof we should commit to him, while ignoring or making excuses for the larger portion of his track record.  When he is able to consistently turn in franchise QB extension worthy outings the tone of the posts will reflect that.  I have already said that if he would play like he did in the WC as often as we need him to, I would be okay with keeping him.  See you don’t want to talk about that though because it shows actual fair minded evaluation not stanning.   
×
×
  • Create New...