Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Schwartz: More than 50 players showed up for workouts


CatMan72

Recommended Posts

That matches what Moose was saying on his radio show today. That is the most I have heard for any team. Great news in my opinion. Bunch of guys that are out to prove they are ready to ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is mildly discouraging

why? sounds like those things were just thrown together. this one sounds like it had a lot of planning.

how long did those teams have workouts? this is going to be 8 days over the course of a couple weeks.

how many people showed up for theirs? how many showed up for this one?

sorry....not much to be discouraged about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree Rayzor. This one seems more organized and I would imagine more will get done. I would like to see how Cam is in the huddle and if he can call up a play and execute it.

I also agree. Cam has spent a good amount of time learning the new system and executing it. Now he can meet with the rest of the team and apply it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since there are only 52 players on an active NFL roster, I'd say that most (if not all) of the current players actually attended this workout..

A good sign to say the least.

well...there are about 80 on the roster right now and that number will grow a little as they head into training camp.

probably a good few of them (esp. if they know what's good for them) are guys who are on the fringe and didn't make the active roster last year. PS guys and such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the only problem i can see with this volume of players, is who is running the show? If that isnt established, how organized will this really be?

well, I know I could figure out how to organize these events.. so I'm assuming the leaders of the team can as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...