Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Schwartz: More than 50 players showed up for workouts


CatMan72

Recommended Posts

That matches what Moose was saying on his radio show today. That is the most I have heard for any team. Great news in my opinion. Bunch of guys that are out to prove they are ready to ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is mildly discouraging

why? sounds like those things were just thrown together. this one sounds like it had a lot of planning.

how long did those teams have workouts? this is going to be 8 days over the course of a couple weeks.

how many people showed up for theirs? how many showed up for this one?

sorry....not much to be discouraged about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree Rayzor. This one seems more organized and I would imagine more will get done. I would like to see how Cam is in the huddle and if he can call up a play and execute it.

I also agree. Cam has spent a good amount of time learning the new system and executing it. Now he can meet with the rest of the team and apply it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since there are only 52 players on an active NFL roster, I'd say that most (if not all) of the current players actually attended this workout..

A good sign to say the least.

well...there are about 80 on the roster right now and that number will grow a little as they head into training camp.

probably a good few of them (esp. if they know what's good for them) are guys who are on the fringe and didn't make the active roster last year. PS guys and such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the only problem i can see with this volume of players, is who is running the show? If that isnt established, how organized will this really be?

well, I know I could figure out how to organize these events.. so I'm assuming the leaders of the team can as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • I think the Bevell hire has more to do with adding actual veteran head coaching experience to the staff than anything else. But I do wholeheartedly agree that the obsession in general with Seattle needs to come to an end. I mean we plucked the one guy there to be our GM who turned out to be our worst GM in franchise history in just a few short years and that's really saying something given our history there. Clearly trying to mimick Seattle in any way has not been productive. As far as Idzik many of us have asked the same question but at this point in time it doesn't really matter anymore because Canales is either going to lead this franchise to a winning record or he will be shown the door.
    • Why wasn't here even considered? Better record and save % than any of t he 3 goalies on the US squad.
    • That’s why Bevell is a good move. Idzik might not be chopped liver, he is just inexperienced and even less ready to be the play caller than Canales. I still say the playbook is limited which is a hinderance to calling plays, I would imagine.    Anyway Beavis lol… no Bevell, got to consecutive SBs as an OC and won one with 48 points or something. Should have won the second one. And had several more good years there.    They were the team we had to learn how to beat it took us til the third year I think before we could go into Seattle and successfully compete.   That is glass half full thinking, yep, but that is head and shoulders over what we have had here for a while. Certainly now.     In addition.. It was Canales’ boss. He knew more then , I would bet he knows more now. I can’t look at this as anything but a potential positive thing.  Hell he might be the guy that can look at Dave and say what the fug are you doing? And Dave will listen. I think I can hope for that.  Maybe not.      
×
×
  • Create New...