Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Right of Refusal


MHS831

Recommended Posts

I looked for this, cannot believe it has not been made into a thread. So I will throw it out there. If it has been discussed, Please forgive me. I have not been visiting much lately.

Basically, this is in reference to the right of refusal clause that is on the table for this year only. Each team will (of course, nothing has been approved) have the right to match offers for 3-4 players (TBD).

Personally, I think this is huge for the Panthers. It means that the only way we lose Charles Johnson is if someone pays so much, they win a bidding war. Since we have tons of cash and a huge need, I do not see teams trying to do that.

It also means we should have the option to keep Deangelo Williams. I imagine the third player we would protect is Thomas Davis, but I don't see a huge bidding war for his services.

The third player could be James Anderson, and it will be unless someone offers a ton for him. I do not see that happening, even though he will get paid. It depends on what Rivera wants to do with Connor, but I think Anderson gets protected.

If there is a fourth player, do not laugh, it could be J. Jansen--yes, the long snapper. He was solid last season, and needs to be re-signed because we have no one to take his place. I considered Matt Moore, Derek Landri, Dante Rosario, and even Nick Hayden, but Jansen would be the hardest to replace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think for CJ we probably get in a bidding war most likely.

I know Denver has said they have interest in D-will and Dolphins.

I hadn't heard any buyers for Davis or Anderson.

I've heard that the saints and falcons night be in the olb department with both teams interested in Anderson and the falcons with Davis but this is just fan speculation too so it probably not solid info.

I almost forgot I've seen on an espn insider that the Rams might be interested in Anderson as well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Teams that might pursue Charles Johnson:

Atlanta--They drafted Gamecock Cliff Matthews in the seventh, but I think they want a stud now. Matthews might not make the roster. Good news? CB is possibly a bigger need.

Denver--converting to a 4-3, they have many needs. DL is a huge need.

NY Giants--could lose 2 DEs before camp.

Minnesota--aging front 4, losing a DE-possibly.

New Orleans--Sure they drafted Cameron Jordan, but to take a conference rival's stud pass rusher could save Brees some lumps. The need a replacement for Alex Brown.

Philadelphia--Brandon Graham tore his ACL at the end of the season and they really didn't address it.

Tennessee--do not know why, maybe Babin, but they seem to be in the hunt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMHO I think they will refuse to get into a bidding war, sadly, someone will pay out the ass for him.

We have a ton of cash that we HAVE to spend. I see us keeping CJ unless the bidding is crazy. I think the teams in our division are our biggest threat because not only do they upgrade a position, they downgrade one for us. If we can take the pass rushing threats away from our nearest competitors, our QBs last longer. We will not let him go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have a ton of cash that we HAVE to spend. I see us keeping CJ unless the bidding is crazy. I think the teams in our division are our biggest threat because not only do they upgrade a position, they downgrade one for us. If we can take the pass rushing threats away from our nearest competitors, our QBs last longer. We will not let him go.

I agree. JR has, and will spend the money. He will regain the ebb of his fan base by "splashing" into FA (when it happens) by retaining our core. Its been our philosophy and in keeping Hurney it will remain our philosophy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

uhh, JR isnt gonna spend the money to keep certain players if there are better players available. He will pay what they are worth and thats it. lol you really think he sacrificed last season to stockpile money just to throw it away?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

uhh, JR isnt gonna spend the money to keep certain players if there are better players available. He will pay what they are worth and thats it. lol you really think he sacrificed last season to stockpile money just to throw it away?

Uh, I don't recall anyone saying we would throw crazy money at our players if better players are available. Charles Johnson is 25, had about 12 sacks with no DTs and not much help from the other side. I realize that it was only 1 year, but still, 4-3 DEs are at a premium in this league and our coach knows that better than anyone. Who in free agency is better than CJ? It is debatable. We are not letting him go. To us, since we have 3 pretty good RBs in the stable, I think spending big on a 28-year old RB is not smart when you need top DT and CB help.

I did say that we would retain CJ unless the money gets stupid. JR paid Peppers more than he was worth to keep him here. He paid Jake more than he was worth. I think there are times when you have no choice. CJ is in the captain's seat, and he will be a Panther next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a key issue for us. I understand that in addition to expected resistance from the players, there is some resistance from some owners who plan to be very aggressive in free agency and are wanting to sign other team's players away from them. If we were able to protect 3 players you know Johnson would be one of them and we would pay what we needed to match any offers. He is a very important piece to our puzzle on defense and no matter what we pay, in 3 or 4 years if he continues to develop, he will be worth it.

As for who else we would protect, that is hard to say. Anderson and Williams would both be in the mix.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will be very very surprised if Anderson, Williams, and CJ are not back. I can't imagine teams getting in a bidding war for Anderson, so that one will be pretty easy to resign. Williams has not shown that he has any interest to leave and we will pay him and he deserves it. We might have to overpay for CJ a little bit, because I think there will be a bidding war for him. Part due to the fact that there will not be many DE studs out there and there are a lot of teams that need to address that position. It will be a roll of the dice with CJ because he has only had one year with pro bowl numbers. I think he is worth it based on potential and his age, but it is going to be a bit of a gamble. I think we are going to have to pay him BIG money to stay. I would imagine $10 million a year to keep him.

Except for last year, JR has never let a player leave because of money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've heard that the saints and falcons night be in the olb department with both teams interested in Anderson and the falcons with Davis but this is just fan speculation too so it probably not solid info.

I almost forgot I've seen on an espn insider that the Rams might be interested in Anderson as well

davis also went to UG, so of course the faclowns fans want him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...