Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

WR FA Poll: Who's your preference?


davos

Recommended Posts

It seems like the talk around bringing in an established WR is growing...I figured we could get a poll. Who do you like the best?

*Don't change this to a Smitty thread.

I figured putting the prospects out on a list together could help.

One more thing to note: No one seems to be talking about Breaston, the Jones', & Lance Moore.

:cheers2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no one. I like the potential of our young guys, and i'm pretty damn sure pilares is going to be a beast too.

The only problem with that is how many times have we done this? How many times have we said we don't need to bring in any big name FA wrs because we have "potential" at that position already. And how many times has it failed? I'd rather bring in some one that has been an established wr opposite of Steve Smith because let's face it Steve can't carry us like he used too he is getting older. That way our younger Wrs have another season to develop then if Steve leaves us next year Gettis and Lafell will be in better position to step up and be the Wrs of this team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's likely going to tell the story. He'll have two weeks to prepare, so no excuses.
    • You don't rotate offensive linemen dude shown me one time thats happened for us that wasnt because of a player leaving due to injury or a jumbo package ill wait.
    • I didn't say I thought throwing it was a bad decision, I said I thought not running those 3-5 yard routes to pick up the 1st down wasn't a great call.  Yes the play worked out, but I didn't love the play call, it's like when a bad shooter is taking a 3 and you're yelling "no no no" as they're going up and then they make it so it worked out. That's still gambling on them to make the play and I take no issue with that. But I just went and watched the play again, we had T-Mac and XL running downfield crossing routes, Coker went in motion behind the LOS and then moved up a yard or two after the snap but not even past the LOS, Sanders chipped the DE and then ran a drag route right long the LOS. The play worked out, but I don't really like that particular play call and route tree with the game on the line on a 4th and 2.  If you want to send one route downfield as an option that's fine, but there were only 2 realistic target options with that route tree and they were both 15-20 yards downfield. This is just before Bryce is going to throw it.   You have 2 players off screen downfield, one player who ran a route that never had a chance to get open and didn't even get to the 1st down line, another player just at the line to gain but late in the route because of a chip (and the worst pass catcher of the 4). Do you really think that was a "good play call" in that situation? 
×
×
  • Create New...