Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers need a vet QB but Bulger isn't the right fit


CatMan72

Recommended Posts

From the National Football Authority:

The Cam Newton era in Carolina is near, but until the first overall pick is ready to seize the starting job, the Panthers need a placeholder at quarterback.

Jimmy Clausen is not the answer after a horrific rookie season that featured an abysmal 58.4 passer rating.

Instead, the Panthers need to add a grizzled veteran quarterback.

One of the most accomplished veterans available is Marc Bulger, who spent last year as the backup in Baltimore after years as a starter in St. Louis.

But Bulger isn’t a great fit for Panthers. That’s in large part because he seems to prefer being on a good team, even as a backup, to starting for a bad team. Had he wanted to be a full-time starter in 2011, Bulger reportedly could have gotten a gig in Arizona.

The fact that Bulger apparently prefers to stay as a backup in Baltimore leads to questions about whether he is willing to take more lumps for a lower-tier team.

Read more: http://www.nationalfootballauthority.com/2011/07/panthers-need-veteran-qb-but-marc.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all the changes, it's not like we are coming out winning anyway... Let Jimmy play.. see if he can make some improvement from last year. Let him try to hold the fort and be at least decent until Cam is ready. Maybe he shows value and can be moved later, or maybe a reliable #2 or backup in Carolina.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bulger may not have much of a choice and we might be the best option. That said he might not be the right fit for us. He is not much of a back up at this point and teaching and ridding pine is his best talents. We need someone to be able to step in if Cam is not ready cause Jimmy will never be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can't help but think that you are equating physical attributes alone with wins. I don't subscribe to that thought. No one will argue that Young has a strong arm, but he makes up for it in other ways. The real limitation for him is he needs good route runners with great hands. That's why Young was so good at the end of the 24 season. Thielen and Coker were perfect receivers for him and he had his best games with them. Not having them to start the 25 season hurt. Look at the first 10 games in 25 with a rookie receiver and no Coker and then look at the final 7 games with a more experienced rookie and Coker back and there is a telling difference in Young's performance. Prior to week 10, Young had 1 game with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and 6 games with a rating below 90. In the last 7 games with Coker back, Young had 3 games with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and only 2 games with a rating below 90. The tools a QB has to work with matter more than their arm strength.  To go back to Darnold and Stafford, yes they both have great arm strength but neither had much success with that alone. As I already pointed out, Stafford, even with a canon for an arm, only had 4 winning seasons in his first 12 years. It was only when he went to the right environment that he had true success.
    • I don't love this role for him if I'm being totally honest The pregame show is much more flash than substance and doesn't seem like the right fit for what Luke would bring to the table, and that's his vision of the game. I'd like to see him do something where it more involves him breaking down film and explaining what he's seeing out there, as he sees the game in a way very few ever have.
×
×
  • Create New...