Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Amobi Okoye to be traded/released by the Texans


Swarly

Recommended Posts

So you are calling him a bust and suggesting the need to pick him up in the same post?

yes

he's only 24, was picked like #7 overall, and he will be cheap. at worst we bring him to camp, he flops, and we cut him before week one. at best he figures out what went wrong and we have a starting interior linemen.

we desperately need interior linemen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes

he's only 24, was picked like #7 overall, and he will be cheap. at worst we bring him to camp, he flops, and we cut him before week one. at best he figures out what went wrong and we have a starting interior linemen.

we desperately need interior linemen

I agree if he wouldnt demand a huge contract. I always find myself wanting to take chances on players like these..Sometimes you look like a genius, other times you say you tried.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the standards of the num 7 pick overall, he has been a bust, and the expected him to be a sack machine which most DT's not named Ndamukong Suh aren't. Quietly had a solid year last year, 44 Tackles and 3 sacks, not mindblowing by any stretch, but he is still only 24 and with the right coaching could become a good starter. Hes being released by the texans bc they are moving to a 3-4 def and he isn't really a NT, while he could play DE in a 3-4 he isn't really geared for that. He was scheduled to make over $3 Mill this year, thats a lot to play a DE in a system that features LB's. The only one who really ever gets paid on the DL in a 3-4 is the NT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...