Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We're actually not spending an outrageous amount of money


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

Does everyone realize this? It only appears that way because, instead of sprinkling these big extensions out over the course of 2 or 3 seasons like virtually every other team, we're doing it 2 or 3 days because we hadn't given ANYONE an extension up to this point because of the CBA panic going back a couple years.

We're merely catching up to where we should be. We're still going to have cap space to at least make a run at another big-time free agent if we choose to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think we need another WR at all, especially with the addition of Olson, but a CB is definitely a need since Hogan isn't even an option at the beginning of the year. I'm sure they recognize this. I'd almost bet someone we sign Cromartie or Rogers today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Impossible to say without knowing the structure of the contracts we've signed. But we had around $40 million IIRC. You figure:

Johnson: $10 million?

Williams: $8.5?

Beason: stays the same right? His deal was an extension....

Kalil: will probably drop a couple million once we sign him long-term...

Ron Edwards: $3 million?

Anderson: $6 million?

Davis: Unknown...

Olsen: $5-6 million?

Mare: $4 million? It was 4 years/12 million... seems like a lot.

Just wild guesses... no idea actually how all that bonus money works as far as cap figures go. We've got plenty to sign a couple of 'name' FA's and still be in good shape cap-wise, though.

IIRC, $40 million was to hit the cap floor, correct? If so we could have a ton more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, some of those numbers area bit of (eg. Anderson is earning a lot less) but it's gnerally accurate. Beason's number would probably have gone up a lil, contracts are still getting bigger every year. If you add up all the numbers you listed, you'll get around 40 mil, meanining we'll be a bit over the floor atm. The difference between the cap and the ceiling is only about 12mil (108 vs 120 iirc). I think we have less than 10mil left atm. Does this even cover all the rookies? If not, I'll say we're pushing the limit. Maybe they can cut Brayton or something to clear up some cap room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Impossible to say without knowing the structure of the contracts we've signed. But we had around $40 million IIRC. You figure:

Johnson: $10 million?

Williams: $8.5?

Beason: stays the same right? His deal was an extension....

Kalil: will probably drop a couple million once we sign him long-term...

Ron Edwards: $3 million?

Anderson: $6 million?

Davis: Unknown...

Olsen: $5-6 million?

Mare: $4 million? It was 4 years/12 million... seems like a lot.

Just wild guesses... no idea actually how all that bonus money works as far as cap figures go. We've got plenty to sign a couple of 'name' FA's and still be in good shape cap-wise, though.

IIRC, $40 million was to hit the cap floor, correct? If so we could have a ton more.

Johnson only counts $6-7M this season the way his contract is structured.

Cap hit takes the base salary for that year and allocates the signing bonus over the entire contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also note that right now only the top 51 salaries count toward the cap and the cap is actually 126 million with the allowable exceptions. By season's start all 56 salaries on the active squad count toward the cap. So we still have flexibility at this point and money to spend to get to the 90 player limit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I picked up too turdpiles from the same poster for saying basically I liked both Jake and Cam.  I tried to find where I had been negative and couldn’t see it. It was basically my most ‘fan’ posting in months, I thought. Innocuous approval of the guys behind our two best years. Could not make sense of it other to think that it was not okay with someone that I like both QBs. 
    • They are not equal. But I didn’t believe either was worth that ridiculously desperate trade up.  I agreed with you then and still believe that now. We got horrible value for those assets.    Half the people here trashed the 2023 offense while overlooking that a coach they don’t think much of went 6-6 with them to finish 2022. You could have built on that.   Think about the picks lost and DJ too, and the additional investment in 2024 and the 1st this year and imagine all that still being done and having Darnold running it.  Then the 9th in 2023, the other 1st and two 2nds, you could have put them into the defense and still have had the massive offensive investment. Granted you would have altered the cap money you had for the guards by paying Darnold.  And tell me we wouldn’t have been so far ahead of where we are now….
×
×
  • Create New...