Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Goodson's fumbling problem


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

and get used to overpaying for stars, we aren't a big market team, 2-14 at that, we aren't a desirable city for most people with cash, especially young. Overpaying, is what we have to give. Goodson was an argument for why we shouldn't have given so much. I don't know how anyone knows if a player is overpaid until he completes what he is being paid for. I'd hate to go to work with that mindset.

Outside of us being 2-14 none of that other stuff matters. If this team starts winning consistently it wont matter if we are a small market team. Players want to win games. Hurney has always overpaid for his own players its nothing new. I'm not complaining just saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not going to lie, if he wants to see the field he should be telling Coach Rivera that; not the fans. Sure, we are upset that he can't hang on to the damn ball but no need to apologize to us.

Anyway in response to the original question,

Goodson will definitley be on the team because of what he brings to the team, but if he does not solve his problem by the end of the season; I could see him being traded for a 5th round pick to someone in need of a runningback.

Also of note in 125 total carries in the regular season (since Goodson has been in the league), he has fumbled five times.

Leaving him with a horrific, one fumbler per every 25 carries. That has to be one of the worst in the league. He also has two fumbles on kick returns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why don't we just say they can shove the late round draft picks up their ass? If they want a player they will be starting at WR in Week 1, I want a MLB in return that we can start Week 1. Starter for a Starter Not Starter for a draft pick we'll be debating whether or not they should make the final 53 man roster in 2026.
    • Why?   No. This isn't a situation of a player we want to trade because we have no use for them.  He's our starting slot WR, our leader of the young WR room, Bryce's safety option the last 2 years who he has good chemistry with. If the Vikings didn't run into WR trouble, we'd never have been even considering trading him, so why in the world should we give him up for fair market value in a vacuum for Thielen and disregard what losing him off our roster will do for us this year? A 5th round pick in 2026 is a negligible draft pick, especially with this season being so make or break for Bryce and Canales.
    • The Vikings acquiring all these late round picks has me feeling like we're about to see another CMC situation play out here. Trade a player we really like for the equivalent of what we want for them on the draft pick chart, but because of a bunch of late round picks instead of the one pick value we actually want. Which will do the same thing in the end, nothing, because 6th and 7th round picks rarely work out to begin with, or we're just going to use them to move up 10 picks in the 3rd or 4th round to take another DJ Johnson
×
×
  • Create New...