Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gross: There Was A Rhythm To The Offense


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

The real test will be in who we add and their value they can bring.I am sure they are evaluating talent,injuries etc...I feel we will make a move or two..but we do not have the money to address them all.I think the needs at DT and cb are obvious.My fear is we will not have plan B for the offesive line.I hope there no illusions on the value Otah will bring.His knee was swollen from just showing up at training camp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't expect people to talk negatively about Rivera this year, no matter how bad we do except for fair weather fans. Most people with any football sense knows this is going to be a rough year, though it looks to be more rough than even some of us were expecting. I literaly lol'd in the season prediction threads when the homers were giving us anything close to a .500 or even a winning record this year. At this point, even my 5 win estimate is looking iffy.

I predicted 4 wins and wonder if we can make that given our schedule

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As bad as Cam's percentage was last night, how many receivers looked open when the ball went in their direction. Yea, Cam had some bad throws but he looks much more comfy in the pocket versus Clausen. At least Cam can extend the play and looks to throw down the field to get the first down. At this point, I would look at Derek Anderson next week and see what he does. If he flops or fairs no better than Cam, then Cam is your starter. Cam will get better with more play. Clausen is third on the depth chart in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As bad as Cam's percentage was last night, how many receivers looked open when the ball went in their direction. Yea, Cam had some bad throws but he looks much more comfy in the pocket versus Clausen. At least Cam can extend the play and looks to throw down the field to get the first down. At this point, I would look at Derek Anderson next week and see what he does. If he flops or fairs no better than Cam, then Cam is your starter. Cam will get better with more play. Clausen is third on the depth chart in my opinion.

Great post. I pointed that out in the chat last night... Again, Cam had some off throws, but how often was he throwing to an open man without a defender already on his back.

It seems like the whole offense is still figuring stuff out... OL botching protections, not working together on passing off rushers, WRs (mostly) and TEs not getting open... Just a bad combination of things going wrong simultaneously right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just because we didn't see it doesn't mean it wasn't there. once you got past being pissed at how badly things looked in the first half you could see that things were clicking better in the 2nd half. they looked better and more comfortable out there together.

yeah, i wouldn't exactly use the word 'fluid' in describing what i saw, but i'll buy 'rhythm'. it's not an excuse. not sure how anyone could say that there was a rhythm there as an excuse for poor play. all it is saying is that things got to a point that it felt better to them...not that losing felt good or anything foolish like that.

btw...some of you guys need more fiber in your diet. you sound like bunch of constipated ducks on here and on twitter with all the bitching and whining. yeah, things looked bad and probably worse than we expected, but it's just week 3 of preseason. things will get better. this isn't last year where the team had no incentive to improve. these guys have a chip on their shoulder. you want them to get better, don't start calling them out and bitching at them on twitter or whatever. all your going to do is let them know that this fan base doesn't have their back and you'll just get blocked out.

screw it...sound like a bunch of bitter old drunk women if you want. i'm not saying you have to feel good about it or sweep it under the rug, but there are better ways of showing it than the way a couple of you did. it doesn't do anyone any good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many of our QBs have to get blind sided thanks to Gross before we start looking to replace him or move him to another side. And Gamble, whoever ranks these players like they do obviously has never watched him play. Terrible and with what he makes he should have an untouchable island out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In another post, Snow says about three years before you can properly grade a rookie class.  Sounds about right…
    • And this reiterates why I don’t want a Young contract extension. Please let us find another QB. 
    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
×
×
  • Create New...