Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The race for Andrew Luck


hepcat

Recommended Posts

I saw an article on ESPN Insider about who could likely hold the #1 pick in the 2012 NFL draft and choose Andrew Luck. Here I outline the 5 times I think could wind up with the worst record and choose the heralded QB.

#1: Kansas City Chiefs

After getting blown out in consecutive weeks against the usual bottom feeders in Buffalo and Detroit, you've gotta put them at the top of the list. They lost their most explosive offensive playmaker in Jamaal Charles and key defensive cog in saftey Eric Berry. Matt Cassel hasn't done anything to keep his team in the game and I hate to say this early that they are out of the playoff race. They might scrape together a few divisional wins, but even now it looks unlikely.

#2: Seattle Seahawks

Seattle greatly overachieved in 2010 and look a few steps back this year. Matt Hasslebeck had a resurgence last season and this year they have the perpetually awful Tavaris Jackson starting at QB. They could pull out a few wins playing in the NFC West, but all their competition in their division look stronger than last year and the Seahawks have definitely regressed.

#3: Indianapolis Colts

All depends on if Peyton Manning returns this season. I can't see why he would. Manning floated the Colts for so many years, and no one really realized it until this year. It makes all the sense in the world for them to tank the season and draft Luck #1. Manning will be 37 next season and how many more games does he have left? Even if he plays until 40, having Luck learn under one of if not the best QBs to ever lace them up would be an arguably better situation than Aaron Rodgers in Green Bay.

#4: Minnesota Vikings

It gets a little murkier here, because the Vikings have some very talented players on their roster. But the QB situation is dismal and even after drafting Christian Ponder in the first round, I could see them drafting Luck if they find themselves at #1. Their division is arguably the second best in the NFL right now (behind the AFC East I'd say) and even stealing a few division wins will be tough for them.

#5: Jacksonville Jaguars

Tough to put them here. I considered putting the 49ers here but they have shown some grit in their first two games. Jacksonville did draft Blaine Gabbert in the first round last year, but who could pass on a prospect like Luck over someone like Gabbert? Again, this all depends on when they play Gabbert and how he does this year. If he has any degree of success, they probably won't end up #1. And Jack Del Rio has done a great job keeping Jacksonville around .500. It drives all of the 23 Jaguars fans nuts, but it's just enough to keep a coach from getting fired (as we saw with John Fox).

And a prospective #6 choice for worst record this year...and everyone will hate this...is Carolina. Newton has been incredible for a rookie in his first 2 games, but everyone should remember that Peyton Manning finished 3-13 in his rookie season, and Troy Aikman was 1-15. Would the Panthers draft Luck if they ended up #1? It's possible depending on how Newton plays out the season. If he keeps playing like he has, absolutely not. They could trade that pick for a pirates bounty and put all kinds of talent around Newton. But I still see Carolina being around 5-11 or 6-10 and having a top 10 pick. Hurney likes to deal on draft day and could parlay that pick into more choices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who better to replace Peyton with?

It would set up a Panther / Colts SB in 2 years.

The Colts are going to need a lot more than Andrew Luck assuming that Peyton doesn't come back. He has been masking that team's deficiencies for years, and their other complementary players are aging. By the 2013 SuperBowl, Reggie Wayne will be 35, Dallas Clark will be 34, Dwight Freeney, Robert Mathis, and Gary Brackett will be 33. Unless they absolutely nail the next 2 drafts, I can't see the Colts being a threat without Manning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seattle may be the worst team talent wise, but they do play in the NFC West so that should give them a couple games.

Colts and Jaguars will battle each other for last place in that division, so they may end up with a couple wins.

Minnesota playing in a division with GB, Detroit, and Chicago could very well end up with the worst record.

KC has the injury bug this year, and the way Cassel is playing could give them the worst record.

I believe its between Minnesota and KC for Andrew Luck

anymore injuries for the Panthers, we may be right there with them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How about if you don't like my choice of content, then don't click on the thread? We're discussing the NFL, not Pee-wee football. Until we start having "great" games on a continuous basis, I'm going to continue to talk all facets of the team. Moreover, I haven't seen X have a "great" game yet. Just like I supported patience last season, I have become critical this season. If it hurts your feelings, it just hurts your feelings. I've been on this board longer than most of you, and I've been a fan of the Panthers since before they stepped on the field, so don't tell me how to fan. 
    • Speaking generally to this whole thing— I would say taking a play out of structure too soon isn’t always the riskier option with a higher reward. You’re crashing the call and going out of structure when maybe you didn’t need to. Attempting a premature escape does not inherently have a high reward. But yeah, it’s risky ball. Especially when your not outpacing IDLs. Sometimes the higher risk/reward option is staying in a crowded pocket, not letting it break down, stepping up and making the big time throw. Now, if we’re saying it’s impossible to judge, and there’s so many factors, it’s a complicated position to evaluate, sure but the saying something with so much certainty that his biggest weakness is that he’s too aggressive — I don’t, I just don’t see that. Like at all.  And nothing has really convinced me otherwise. You can’t just keep going on about how it’s so intricate and difficult to understand but be so certain about this one thing. And all that aside, pocket work, mechanics and footwork have been the flashing red sirens since day 1 more than physical traits (we drafted him knowing he was a historic outlier) - do we just not want to acknowledge it? It’s even been communicated straight from the horses mouth…the coaches and team saying what he needs to work on the most. I appreciate the perspective, but nothing here has convinced me Bryce is somehow this aggressive type. Still open, but I don’t see it
    • I think Egbuka is a very polished guy, for sure. TMac has some refinement that needs to happen. His ceiling is probably higher than Egbuka's but for that to matter you have to eventually reach it. I definitely don't have buyers remorse on TMac. Great pick.
×
×
  • Create New...