Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Roy


liljah8303

Recommended Posts

Just to compare to recent ROY's. Thought this was pretty cool.

Cam Newton (Future ROY)

52-of-83 passes

854 yards,

5 touchdowns, (2 rushing)

4 int

89.1 QB rating.

Last year's Rookie of the Year, Sam Bradford. Through two weeks

46-of-80 (55 attempts in game 1)

420 yards,

3 touchdowns

4 int

63.5 QB rating.

Matt Ryan, the 2008 ROY winner,

22-of-46

319 yards,

1TD,

2 int

60.0 QB rating through his first two starts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a comparison of the last 2 ROY QB's in there first two week. You douche. I dont know why people have to be tough guys on the forums.

:coolgleamA:

How is that being a tough guy? I just said that those guys didn't win the award based on the first two games. If you felt like that was an attack, that's your problem not mine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is that being a tough guy? I just said that those guys didn't win the award based on the first two games. If you felt like that was an attack, that's your problem not mine.

Don't you think it's fairly obvious to the rest of us that they didn't win the ROY in the first two weeks?

Thanks for the OP, I think it's fun to compare our players to one's that preceed them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Andy Dalton has a win and no INTS

And who did he play against?

The Browns and Broncos. He also has less total passing yards (413) than either of Cam's games. And in the game he did win, Benson ran 25 times for 121 yards. But I am sure that had nothing to do with it because that is how great dalton is right? He threw for 10/15 for 81 yards and a TD. Cam Newton looked that good in the first quarter against the superbowl champs with no run game.

Please, come up with a better argument than that. Sheesh.

/end rant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
    • On Panther's Wire too. No idea, just found it and trying to share. https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/panthers/2025/06/15/nfl-free-agency-rumors-panthers-eagles-justin-simmons/84219881007/
×
×
  • Create New...