Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reset Swag and pie?


Zod

Recommended Posts

So, do you mean I have rep only because males have repped me for the wrong reasons?

Not at all. I think you're a high quality poster. Honestly, I pretty much think all the ladies posting on here are very intelligent and fun to converse with.

What I mean is that some guys will rep female posters for just about anything. That's absolutely no reflection on the women, mind you. Again, it's a comment on them, not you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately the statement is probably true.

Disagree, I think LP deserves the rep she's gotten. She's always been a consistent and quality poster here. I don't think Mr. Scot was trying to be specific about any particular female poster (s) having gotten rep for just posting, more trying to make a comment on some of the apparent attitude of male posters here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not at all. I think you're a high quality poster. Honestly, I pretty much think all the ladies posting on here are very intelligent and fun to converse with.

What I mean is that some guys will rep female posters for just about anything. That's absolutely no reflection on the women, mind you. Again, it's a comment on them, not you.

Read: Guys are dumb and will do anything to show attention to a human that has a vagina. You aren't dumb for having a vagina, the guys are just dumb for being obsessed with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not at all. I think you're a high quality poster. Honestly, I pretty much think all the ladies posting on here are very intelligent and fun to converse with.

What I mean is that some guys will rep female posters for just about anything. That's absolutely no reflection on the women, mind you. Again, it's a comment on them, not you.

I appreciate that you think I am a hi quality poster. I do not think that you give that praise unless you mean it. So...thank you.

However, you generally say women here get praise (rep) because guys are scum.

So, what percentage of my rep is by scum. In your opinion?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I appreciate that you think I am a hi quality poster. I do not think that you give that praise unless you mean it. So...thank you.

However, you generally say women here get praise (rep) because guys are scum.

So, what percentage of my rep is by scum. In your opinion?

I have repped you a good bit so that answers your question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have repped you a good bit so that answers your question.

Yes you have Salty. I appreciate your support. As well as many others. I actually think in the football forum (where I think I have received 90% of my rep....but please Zod fact check that) it has been earned by the quality of my posts/ If not............ I always welcome feedback.

Mr Scot was the one who said women get repped for the wrong reasons. Want to hear more from him about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...