Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ron Meeks vs Sean Mcdermott


Carolina Fan

Recommended Posts

Now obviously both of them have different personnel, but here is a look at the stats for both of them.

McDermott

Defense Rank: 17th

Yards Allowed: 358.8

3rd Down pct: 46%, That is tied with 2nd worst in the NFL

ToP: 29:11

Sacks: 16

Int: 4

FF: 7

Meeks

Defense Rank: 18th

Yards Allowed: 335.9

3rd Down pct: 38

ToP: 32:36

Sacks: 31

Int: 17

FF: 15

After half way through the season, if you was to double McDermotts stats

(I know thats a bad way to do this but lets just say.)

I know alot of us was Ron Meeks fans last year, What defense would you rather have now?

do you think our record would be better with meeks calling plays?

Or do you like McDermotts Risky blitz defense better and why?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a decent comparison. That was Meek's second year in the same system. McDermott is on his first year with no offseason to install things. Plus Beason was a huge loss this year.

Lets compare McDermott's stats at the end of next year with Meeks stats for 2010 and then you have a decent comparison.

Otherwise go back and compare the first 8 games of 2009 to the first 8 games this year and you have a better comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year, the defense really turned it on in the second half. This D will improve in time, but right now I feel they they are below last year's D.

You have to remember that last year's D looked really bad in the second half of every game simply because the offense could not stay on the field. This year, the offense is helping the D out quite a bit by creating some long drives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, yes, there is a difference between looking at a box score and watching film.  But PFF has a big subjective aspect to some of their grades.  That's how you get a 2/4 being better than 3/5 with a TD.  You aren't using stats at that point or factual events, but subjective analysis of plays.   And it's not like it is the same subjective analysis applying across all the players.   Same guy grading BY's incompletions (which are putting him over the top) isn't grading everyone else's incompletions and completions.  So it's different subjective takes/viewpoints applied.  There is no way everyone at PFF views grading out a play the same.  Then it all dumps into the same spreadsheet.  Hit the sort button.  Sometimes I feel it gets really weird and and collective data starts saying some weird stuff that just isn't true.   
    • Yeah, Sanders had a very nice debut preseason performance but the folks acting like he's arrived based on that performance are getting way out ahead of themselves.
    • I won't be surprised if Graham disappoints. Maybe not outright bust but never lives up to his draft status. The more I watched him at Michigan the more I came away impressed by the other Michigan DT. I think he might be the real player. Usually when you have two high level prospects in the same college unit one of them ends up getting fraud checked in the NFL as being largely carried by the other guy. Peppers and Ryan Sims at UNC comes to mind. Lavar Arrington and Courtney Brown at Penn State, etc.
×
×
  • Create New...