Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A scary stat for the offense...

firstdayfan

By firstdayfan,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

firstdayfan Enthusiast

firstdayfan

Posted
Posted

The offense has been nothing short of spectacular throughout the season. People complained that we weren't running the ball enough or effectively but I feel like that has changed a lot since the first two games. It seems like we finally have a balanced almost unstoppable offense here in Carolina, one that would make Steve Beuerlein, Patrick Jeffers, and Mushin Muhammed look like a high school squad. So why are we 2-6? Is it our swiss cheese run defense that allows opposing offenses to chew up the clock and keep Cam's towel on his head? Is it our horrid special teams which allows huge returns, misses chip shot field goals, and can't get figure out how to get the ball past the 30 yard line?

Actually I have another theory...one that actually involves the offense and their inability to score points. And there is one scary stat that makes this problem painfully obvious. The offense is ranked 5th in the NFL in terms of yardage with 415.1 yards per game, 5th in passing (285) and 8th in rushing (129). However, we are ranked 16th in scoring at just 23.4 points per game. How does this compare to the 99' offense you ask? In 1999 we averaged only 355 yards per game, 60 yards less, but averaged 26.3 points per game, over 3 points more and just in case you forgot that team went 8-8.

But hey, that was over a decade ago...how does our scoring compare to other high powered offenses today? The top 5 offenses average 31, 27, 25, and 34 points per game respectively...and then the Panthers at 23 points per game.

So why do we not score more points? Turnovers? Terrible starting field Position? 80 yard plus drives that eat up clock? Rookie QB? Whatever the reason its obvious that even though the defense is bad and the special teams is worse the offense needs to be more effective on the scoreboard. I guess the old adage is correct, you have to score more points than the other guys if you wanna win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

I wouldn't call this an average offense. I would call it a young offense. Average offenses don't put themselves in the redzone the amount of times Carolina has this year.

We have a rookie QB.....don't forget that. Redzone play always takes awhile to get down.

but don't sell short the fact Cam is getting us in the redzone more than any other QB in the NFL.....he is putting us in great situations. He is learning. Things are looking good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SevenSixes Newbie

SevenSixes

Posted
Posted

It's not a fluke that when Cam doesn't turn the ball over we win.

It's also not a fluke that we are one of the most penalized teams in the league.

It's also not a fluke that our competition in the first half was far superior to what most other teams have faced.

But..

Stay calm and carry on..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

Another rehash of a thread that has gone on ad nauseum. The offense in general is fine. But it dosn't operate in a vacuum. The statistics on how often a team scores is highly dependent on how long it has to drive the ball. Teams that start from their own 40 yard line for example are in field goal range after moving the ball 30 yards. This assumes your kicker can make a 40 yarder. Going from your 20. it would take 50 yards for a field goal try and 80 yards for a Td. Where are we in startiing field position? Near the bottom.

If we are at the top in 80 yard scoring drives we are obviously moving the ball but what people don't figure in is that if it takes 7 minutes to score the good news is that we kept the other offense off the field but if they then take 6 minutes to score on our defense, the first quarter is essentially over and we had one possession. So instead of rehashing the same old crap in the other thread lets at least give this a different spin. Those of you with access to advanced stats and the time to do it. How does our number of offensive possessions per game compare to other teams in the top five. Of thoose possessions, how many are 40 yards or less. How many are over 40 yards? Of those over 40, how many end up with punts, versus missed field goals or turnovers instead of points.

Instead of another tired discussion of points per yard which I really don't think is that informative, lets look at drives which is actually how the game is played and how scoring occurs. Or if you have new information not discussed, then do it here but lets not rehash the same old tired topic.

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

Not terribly surprising.

They're working on his short game, but Newton is still primarily a long ball QB at this point. That type is generally known to struggle in the red zone when things are shortened up. Opposing defenses know it and adjust accordingly. So far we haven't been able to effectively counter.

Once we improve either A) our run game or B) Newton's short game, then you'll see the scoring get better. It's not bad right now, mind you. Just not quite good enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Udogg Enthusiast

Udogg

Posted
Posted

Not terribly surprising.

They're working on his short game, but Newton is still primarily a long ball QB at this point. That type is generally known to struggle in the red zone when things are shortened up. Opposing defenses know it and adjust accordingly. So far we haven't been able to effectively counter.

Once we improve either A) our run game or B) Newton's short game, then you'll see the scoring get better. It's not bad right now, mind you. Just not quite good enough.

TBH it seems to me we get inside the 20 almost every drive. Then it's penalty time. We have the most 1st and goal penalties in the league(don't have any stats to prove this, just seems like it).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mav1234 Grand Master

mav1234

Posted
Posted

offense = points, not yards

we have an average offense

kinda depends. I think yardage is a reflection of how far we have to travel when we do get the ball. Points are a reflection of our entire team... not just our offense. The fewer "good" offensive opportunities, either generated through turnovers or good defensive stops, or through great special teams plays, the fewer points a team will often have even when it has a good offense relative to it's yardage totals. Obviously our offense isn't perfect, but I think things like "yards per point" undervalue field position.

No single stat is really perfect or tells the entire story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Marguide Newbie

Marguide

Posted
Posted

Another rehash of a thread that has gone on ad nauseum. The offense in general is fine. But it dosn't operate in a vacuum. The statistics on how often a team scores is highly dependent on how long it has to drive the ball. Teams that start from their own 40 yard line for example are in field goal range after moving the ball 30 yards. This assumes your kicker can make a 40 yarder. Going from your 20. it would take 50 yards for a field goal try and 80 yards for a Td. Where are we in startiing field position? Near the bottom.

If we are at the top in 80 yard scoring drives we are obviously moving the ball but what people don't figure in is that if it takes 7 minutes to score the good news is that we kept the other offense off the field but if they then take 6 minutes to score on our defense, the first quarter is essentially over and we had one possession. So instead of rehashing the same old crap in the other thread lets at least give this a different spin. Those of you with access to advanced stats and the time to do it. How does our number of offensive possessions per game compare to other teams in the top five. Of thoose possessions, how many are 40 yards or less. How many are over 40 yards? Of those over 40, how many end up with punts, versus missed field goals or turnovers instead of points.

Thoughts?

We are 30th in number of possessions per game. Surprisingly, the teams below us are the Packers and San Diego. As you would expect, we have a far worse starting field position than those teams, coming in at 24th in the league. We also do well in points per drive, ranking 6th.

The only stat in which we are off on a per drive basis is interceptions, coming in at 24th.

Given that we are 29th in penalties per game and we have more offensive than defensive penalties, and given that we are 30th in number of possessions per game, I am certain we would come in last in number of penalties per drive.

So we need to work on the interceptions and cut down the penalties, and we should score with the best teams in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Shotgun
      Solid Breakdown of Bryce's Poor Performance/PFF Stuff

      By Shotgun · Posted

      There's a long history of that here. Byron Bell, Sione Fua, Ian Thomas, Mingo, Bryce Young....I just don't get it.     
    • Icege
      Week 2 - Panthers @ Cardinals (practice tweets, news articles, videos, etc)

      By Icege · Posted

      Summary Week 1 looked a lot like the last couple of years and that's not good. A whole lot of "blah" all around. Losing Turk might be big. Him not being on the DL was not the reason for JAX's run game success on Sunday, but proved to be a better run stopper than anticipated. Valued part of the overhauled DL and it's never good to be immediately out after going down. Hopefully isn't as bad as anticipated but definitely severe enough for him to be out 4 - 6 weeks. Kaye thinks that Bryce got off to a really good start and that his weapons, sans TMac, let him down regularly though Bryce had his own blunders as well. Also felt that he was much worse after the weather delay. OL wasn't particularly good either. Guys were getting out of the huddle late and snapping the ball with very little time remaining. Extended drives that shouldn't have been that long (goes into detail later about this). Bryce is fine but does have to be better and this did look more like a regressive moment rather than progressive. Might have overvalued the finish to the season due to not having much to play for other than be spoilers. PFF offensive and passing grades were discussed. ADOT: 8.8yds - Not great, but not dump it off Bryce that we saw in 2024 ACP - 70%. (ngl, as much as people complain about BTTs being a made up stat it's very difficult for me to take the adjusted completion percentage stat seriously). 12 pressures - Not a way to operate as a QB. Only took 1 sack officially but this means he has to run around to try and get the ball out on time. 8/15 on 3rd down, over 50% is healthy for an offense All of that said, there was still 3 turnovers and operational issues on the offense (getting out of the huddle late, getting the snap off late, snap issues, etc). Bryce as a passer on Sunday was okay, but as a QB he was not good. Had multiple drives ~5min each when trailing by a score or two. Third drive of the game that took place in Q2 lasted 4:53 the team gained 39yds and got two first downs before punting. Took off roughly 1/3rd of the quarter, effectively running the clock out on themselves. Second one took 5:15 and that led to 55yds net (29yds in actual scrimmage, 26yds from penalties) and was the one that ended at 4th & 1 on the JAX 5. They had another drive that 4:10 where they gained 10yds net and got one first down. How can they operate eating away into their own opportunities? Gave 3 possessions to the opposing team and spent what was basically an entire quarter just burning clock. Poor clock management. What happened on Sunday cannot happen again in Arizona. Game should be close and they cannot afford to squander opportunities especially with a defense that gives up the rushing yardage that they do. TMac looked really good and showed a lot of flash. XL... this is back-to-back really good summers but man you have to have some situational awareness. His rookie season was greatly underrated considering what he did in the first half of it. Bryce had a couple of throws that weren't turnovers that he'd want back ie: slot fade to Renfrow, 4th & 1 ball that he just threw up. Physically he was very effective as a passer, but from the mental/decision making side he was not as good. 4th & 1 from the 5 you need to get, give it to Chuba. Yea they stopped it twice before but if Chuba is the guy that is going to make the offense run you've got to go to him. Neither Mike nor Alex would've gone with an empty set in that situation. Passing game was just not working: guys were dropping passes, mis-running routes, not paying attention properly (like not turning their heads). Wouldn't put that on Bryce given how him and the offense were ineffective for the first three quarters. It was the right call to go for it on 4th & 1.  Pivoting to the defense, the run defense is still bad when looking at the numbers. During just the Dave Canales era, the Panthers' defense has allowed 200+ rushing yards nine times (including in seven consecutive games). Even in wins they are getting the ball ran on them heavily. In 35 games as the Panthers DC, Evero's defense has given up 200+ rushing yards 26 times. Only nine games have been under that amount. This scheme does a good job with coverage, especially on the outside, but it's been three years of allowed rushing success. It'd be one thing if they were sacrificing run defense for a pass rush, but not having any pressure in this game while also giving up 200+ yards is very frustrating. Isn't because of being a 3-4 defense, otherwise other 3-4 defenses would have the same issues. Young guys on the defensive side of the ball got very limited opportunities vs. veterans even if the veterans were failing. Evero's history does not play into playing young guys early. DJ Wonnum isn't exactly a Pro Bowl pass rusher that can't leave the field, neither is Pat Jones II, and Nick Scott certainly isn't. If those guys aren't ready, what on the field showed you that the guys that are playing are ready? Moehrig had a rough day in pass coverage. Coen had the TEs targeted often against him. Jaycee Horn + Mike Jackson have been terrific and the scheme benefits them, and while Nick Scott wasn't terrible he's still a replacement level player. A 30yr old safety with limited upside playing on the backend over Lathan Ransom who had a great summer or Demani Richardson who had a great season last year is being antithetical to what Canales says about playing and teaching none guys. Canales said he was going to push for it and people are asking why he doesn't just big boy Evero, but Evero was retained and is the guy for the defense. Scourton and Umanmielen have a lot of potential. Last season's team had no talent on the defense and no depth, but now that they've got these young guys he's not playing them. Hard to be championed as an awesome head coaching candidate if he won't play the kids. "Who have they developed on defense over the last three years?" Yeesh... Mike's got a point. Alex responds that Demani is a guy, but he didn't get to play much at all last week. I'm a little over halfway through but gotta pick up dinner for the family. Will try to finish up tonight or tomorrow morning.
    • frankw
      Solid Breakdown of Bryce's Poor Performance/PFF Stuff

      By frankw · Posted

      Only truly stupid or ignorant people disliked Cam Newton. He made our franchise relevant he tried to change the culture despite constantly being criticized for hating to lose. He looked the part out of the gate in a lockout year too. He was the complete opposite of what we have now. There is zero culture here. Just guys who make hollow generic statements over and over. I have no idea how anyone that isn't under the influence of something could draw parallels to the prime Cam era with that we have now. It's honestly offensive 🤷‍♂️
×
×
  • Create New...