Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gil Brandts top 100 now o. nfl.com

panther4life

By panther4life,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Lout Newbie

Lout

Posted
Posted

http://m.nfl.com/news/09000d5d82652d45/hot-100-which-2012-prospects-are-first-to-top-charts/

Top 10

1. Luck

2.Kalil

3.Blackmon

4.RG 3

5.Coples

6.Jeffery

7.Zach Brown

8.Ryan Tannenhill

9.Clairborne

10.Reiff

We will select a very good player at #8/9.. I can only hope that mostly offensive players are picked before us, pushing all the defensive players down to us. I could see 3 QBs, 1 RB, 1 WR, and 2 OTs picked before us. (wishful thinking).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carpanfan96 Grand Master

carpanfan96

Posted
Posted

Tannehill is also a very talented prospect 6-4 220 and runs a 4.5, has got athletic ability and a pretty good arm. So it's not surprising to see him at 8th overall.

Brockers is very raw and hasn't displayed dominate pass rush moves, that's going to hurt his stock during the draft process.

Kirkpatrick now has off the field question marks to go along with questionable speed (he's expected to run around a 4.5)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Actionman0z Veteran

Actionman0z

Posted
Posted

fwiw, brandt was the biggest cam supporter out there last year.

gil brandt's opinion >>>>>>>>>>>>> mike mayock's opinion.

i may not agree with some of them, but i'm going to give it more credence.

I don't think just because our guy panned out means his opinion means more. Plus, Mayock said the ONLY reason he thought Cam would not be successful was because Mayock thought Cam would be satisfied making all of that money, he said he had no athletic celing and COULD be a mega-star. Nobody saw it coming, simple and plain, but I am glad it did. Because of that pick, I know we will get OUR guy wherever we draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DaCityKats Newbie

DaCityKats

Posted
Posted

I don't think just because our guy panned out means his opinion means more. Plus, Mayock said the ONLY reason he thought Cam would not be successful was because Mayock thought Cam would be satisfied making all of that money, he said he had no athletic celing and COULD be a mega-star. Nobody saw it coming, simple and plain, but I am glad it did. Because of that pick, I know we will get OUR guy wherever we draft.

i guess him putting together the 90's cowboys didnt help either. but he did see the potential in Cam while Mayock jumped on the he is not serial train. amazing how people assumed he would be content with money when his pass showed he was a hard worker.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

I don't think just because our guy panned out means his opinion means more. Plus, Mayock said the ONLY reason he thought Cam would not be successful was because Mayock thought Cam would be satisfied making all of that money, he said he had no athletic celing and COULD be a mega-star. Nobody saw it coming, simple and plain, but I am glad it did. Because of that pick, I know we will get OUR guy wherever we draft.
gil brandt's opinion has always mattered more.he actually has a clue of what to look for and what things really matter. he knows what teams look for and he's got tons of experience.

brandt is a lot more highly regarded as well. he may not have the national recognition in the media that mayock has, but within the industry brandt carries more weight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carpanfan96 Grand Master

carpanfan96

Posted
Posted

zack brown is the tarheel i want in this draft.

He's looked pretty physical in the senior Bowl, if he runs a 4.3 like he should if he's fully healthy and in shape. If the Panthers want to draft him, they might have to do so at 8/9th overall. He looks more like a NFL safety to me, but if he proves that he can hold the edge effectively as a LB, then I have no issue with the pick.

That would be nasty with him coming off the edge on blitz's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      NFLTR: Panthers Offseason:Team Needs, pending free agents, draft picks

      By MHS831 · Posted

      If we don't go OT, we will regret it.  What bothers me?  Are we going to get a starting-caliber OT at 19?  I think the draft is solid at OT, and the more I read up and watch video, the more I watch Lomu, the more I want him.   I see Freeling as a RT who needs some work in run blocking (since we need to run first, maybe not a good fit) and I see Proctor ending up as a Guard.  After Lomu (assuming Mouigia and fanu are gone), I think we wait until round 2.  In round 2, there are about 3-4 I like (Zuhn--good pass blocker and VERY underrated right now; Tiernan is a very good pass blocker as is Miller from Clemson, but both are not good in the run game.  Max Ixxxxx from Ariz St is impressive too---technically, there is not a of difference in these second tier guys--good in pass pro, need work in the run game.   If we wait until round 2 for an OT, we probably need to sign Nijman and start him early.   I almost think this is what we should do if Lomu is gone.  There is a big dropoff after him, imo, and I think we'd get better value if a stud ILB or edge is there.  Someone like TJ Parker Clemson makes sense. If Lomu is gone, trading back might be the play.  
    • PadresPanthersFan
      PNP interview with Coker

      By PadresPanthersFan · Posted

      And what is x gunna help with except show him what not to do. Plus for the first year and a half he was just an obstacle 
    • strato
      NFLTR: Panthers Offseason:Team Needs, pending free agents, draft picks

      By strato · Posted

      I understand that some people want WR. I am solidly against using yet another high pick there. Coker is pretty good and we used No picks on him.  What I think we really need at WR is a little bit of a Smitty lite. It is ridiculous to say let’s get a Smitty because you just can’t do that, but someone not tall and long striding but more in his mold. I think we’d have a pretty well rounded group.    Looking at tackle, with replacing Moton looming, it just seems like the no brainer.  You fill in Icky short term. Depending on how he recovers, and how the new guy plays, you go from there. A tackle at 19 is most likely either a LOT, a ROT, or a big talented guard, at worst. We will need all three in the next couple of years.  I would love to have a stud ILB be there at 19 but the OL is the responsible thing to do I believe. 
×
×
  • Create New...