Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gil Brandts top 100 now o. nfl.com


panther4life

Recommended Posts

http://m.nfl.com/news/09000d5d82652d45/hot-100-which-2012-prospects-are-first-to-top-charts/

Top 10

1. Luck

2.Kalil

3.Blackmon

4.RG 3

5.Coples

6.Jeffery

7.Zach Brown

8.Ryan Tannenhill

9.Clairborne

10.Reiff

We will select a very good player at #8/9.. I can only hope that mostly offensive players are picked before us, pushing all the defensive players down to us. I could see 3 QBs, 1 RB, 1 WR, and 2 OTs picked before us. (wishful thinking).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tannehill is also a very talented prospect 6-4 220 and runs a 4.5, has got athletic ability and a pretty good arm. So it's not surprising to see him at 8th overall.

Brockers is very raw and hasn't displayed dominate pass rush moves, that's going to hurt his stock during the draft process.

Kirkpatrick now has off the field question marks to go along with questionable speed (he's expected to run around a 4.5)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fwiw, brandt was the biggest cam supporter out there last year.

gil brandt's opinion >>>>>>>>>>>>> mike mayock's opinion.

i may not agree with some of them, but i'm going to give it more credence.

I don't think just because our guy panned out means his opinion means more. Plus, Mayock said the ONLY reason he thought Cam would not be successful was because Mayock thought Cam would be satisfied making all of that money, he said he had no athletic celing and COULD be a mega-star. Nobody saw it coming, simple and plain, but I am glad it did. Because of that pick, I know we will get OUR guy wherever we draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think just because our guy panned out means his opinion means more. Plus, Mayock said the ONLY reason he thought Cam would not be successful was because Mayock thought Cam would be satisfied making all of that money, he said he had no athletic celing and COULD be a mega-star. Nobody saw it coming, simple and plain, but I am glad it did. Because of that pick, I know we will get OUR guy wherever we draft.

i guess him putting together the 90's cowboys didnt help either. but he did see the potential in Cam while Mayock jumped on the he is not serial train. amazing how people assumed he would be content with money when his pass showed he was a hard worker.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think just because our guy panned out means his opinion means more. Plus, Mayock said the ONLY reason he thought Cam would not be successful was because Mayock thought Cam would be satisfied making all of that money, he said he had no athletic celing and COULD be a mega-star. Nobody saw it coming, simple and plain, but I am glad it did. Because of that pick, I know we will get OUR guy wherever we draft.
gil brandt's opinion has always mattered more.he actually has a clue of what to look for and what things really matter. he knows what teams look for and he's got tons of experience.

brandt is a lot more highly regarded as well. he may not have the national recognition in the media that mayock has, but within the industry brandt carries more weight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

zack brown is the tarheel i want in this draft.

He's looked pretty physical in the senior Bowl, if he runs a 4.3 like he should if he's fully healthy and in shape. If the Panthers want to draft him, they might have to do so at 8/9th overall. He looks more like a NFL safety to me, but if he proves that he can hold the edge effectively as a LB, then I have no issue with the pick.

That would be nasty with him coming off the edge on blitz's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...