Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fletcher Cox - DT - Miss St.


davos

Recommended Posts

FLETCHER COX

5B1X_cox.jpg

6'4 295 DT/DE Miss St.

14.5 tackles for loss and five sacks. He also had 56 tackles, two blocked kicks, a forced fumble, and a fumble recovery that he returned for 52 yards...in the SEC. His strengths are in his quickness off the ball, overall power, special teams d-line. The weaknesses: he struggles once he's double teamed, but that's not a huge negative for me. The one's of more concern are that he can get a little out of control/off balance because he tries to be overly aggressive.

One of the really nice things to point out is that he took care of business quite well against Bama' this year and is probably one of the most overall consistent defensive players in the draft. He also is said to be a very high character type who was a player's player for Miss St.

The one thing is that he may be better suited for a 3-4...he plays the 5 technique but would be able to go 3-tech in our 4-3 sets. He can move to the ends also because of his quickness and physicality. He can definitely fill gaps up against the run and his athleticism should translate well into the NFL.

I guarantee that our staff is giving Cox a hard look.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Cox a lot and think he is the second best DT in the draft behind Still. He's the same age as Brockers and put up some gaudy stats as "the man" on that defensive line, with considerable less talent around him.

He one of the the players I am anxious to see at the combine. I'd like to see if he's actually as big as he's being listed. If he can come in at 6'4, 6'3 and 300 +, I could see us really take a look at him. Right now he probably projects as more of a 3-4 DE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I only watched that video 2 posts up, WF game. He looks solid, but sluggish as hell off the snap and not nearly as active or violent as Brockers. He certainly can be a good player, saw good effort on his part. If we don't get Brockers I wouldn't mind him in the 2nd, but not the first. Looks more like a 3-4 DE though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am thinking that two picks could be in order for us on the DLine this draft.

I like Brockers in a trade down say at 12 or 13, picking up a third.

then, come back with someone like Akiem Hicks in the 5th or so. I would love to develop a rotation on our DLine which would always be fresh and wreak havoc similar to NY Giants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Believe it or not I actually like Cox. He's big and strong, and a great penetrator

Hawt

but on a serious note I'm starting to think its gonna be Oline and Dline with the first picks. Oline would probably be first seeing as there are some good D lineman that will probably be there in the 2nd.

Gah it feels good to have both 1st and 2nd round picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With the contract money an OT first rounder makes you can ALWAYS get a new girlfriend.  And probably an upgrade at that.  You only got 2 parents.
    • Brother. You are wholly confusing comparing situations and applying actual standards like most other franchises do like simply getting into a playoff series and winning at least 1 or 2 series games with praising. Nobody is praising the Hawks. Nobody is praising the Magic. Nobody here likes those teams. But reality is reality. The Hawks like other franchises have traded players fired coaches etc but they can still win a couple playoff games. How is that not the bare floor for you or anyone else? What are we doing here if it isn't? We've seen eye to eye on many things over the years. But you are in the camp on the Hornets where you are emotionally attached to LaMelo where you feel the need to carry his water like he's got that juice. That's cool that you feel that way. It's your prerogative. But I differ from that viewpoint entirely. If he had that juice we would not have gotten wiped off the court in 2 play in games with 2 different coaching staffs and rosters. if people don't like hearing that well I'm sorry but how the hell is this team ever going to get better and ultimately go anywhere in the postseason if we just blindly pat them on the back for getting their asses whooped before they actually even get into the real playoffs? There seem to be some Bryce Young level standards being applied here. That's wild to me. But to each his own.
    • Proctor/Freeling were always the belles of the ball where we were picking. What those two *could* become at OT was far greater than what others could be at their respective positions and I’m glad our FO could see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...