Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

For me its down to Coples or Jenkins


panther4life

Recommended Posts

Frankly, it's too early to zero in on one or two players. That said, DL should be priority #1 imo.

We could have Revis paired with Gamble, and we would still see little return unless we improve our D-line. If a corner turns out being BPA at our pick, and none of the D-line options look good, then fine, take the corner. But we damn well better have a plan B for the D-line, i.e. FA, or we are going to be very disappointed in our D next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah, i guess we need to be content with having NO real quality starter in the middle of the Dline.

just throw any average 3rd rounder or 30 year old DT in there and we'll be fine.

Rivera said they're fine so ill take his word I think we go after DE over DT. You can call it a smokescreen but last year hurney said we needed a qb, dt, and cb in that order and who did we take?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CB class is deep and I like Brandon Hogan so at this point (before the combine) I'd rather take Coples, Brockers/Still, Upshaw or trade down and get Ingram, Zach Brown, Poe or Perry.

...though I would be perfectly happy with Jenkins or even Kirkpatrick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why so quick to give up on Fua,Mcclain anyway?
*sigh*

again, who said i was giving up on them? i want them in the rotation.

i want to make the interior of the line dominant...not just for a year (hello 2009 with 2 old guys) but for years (hello giants).

why not try to make the dline dominant without hoping that maybe that old guy and two 3rd rounders and a couple late round picks and a udfa might somehow be able to scrap together to become something good? why not get serious about it and try to take the best DT talent in the draft?

meh...go ahead and feel good about maybe having a mediocre presence in the middle of the line. i want to have at least one legit and dominant starter at each position. i'm not sure what the problem is there and i'm not sure why it's so bad that i don't have confidence in mcclain and fua being that?

did rivera say that those two guys were ok? sure, but what else is he supposed to say? they might pan out, but i just don't know if the talent is there to pass up a guy like brockers or one of the other top end DTs in this draft. i don't know if they make DT as stout as it needs to be to have tha dominant presence on the Dline.

i just want us to get better in the trenches and then work backwards to strengthen everything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*sigh*

again, who said i was giving up on them? i want them in the rotation.

i want to make the interior of the line dominant...not just for a year (hello 2009 with 2 old guys) but for years (hello giants).

why not try to make the dline dominant without hoping that maybe that old guy and two 3rd rounders and a couple late round picks and a udfa might somehow be able to scrap together to become something good? why not get serious about it and try to take the best DT talent in the draft?

meh...go ahead and feel good about maybe having a mediocre presence in the middle of the line. i want to have at least one legit and dominant starter at each position. i'm not sure what the problem is there and i'm not sure why it's so bad that i don't have confidence in mcclain and fua being that?

did rivera say that those two guys were ok? sure, but what else is he supposed to say? they might pan out, but i just don't know if the talent is there to pass up a guy like brockers or one of the other top end DTs in this draft. i don't know if they make DT as stout as it needs to be to have tha dominant presence on the Dline.

i just want us to get better in the trenches and then work backwards to strengthen everything else.

I pointed out those 2 old dudes in 09 to show you that dt's are not the mvp's of the defense or even the defensive line. You cited that you want a line like the Giants have because "they have been a dominant line for years" and I am inclined to agree with you there.Where we disagree is why they are dominant.

Their starting DT'S this year were Linval Joseph:2nd year player(much improved from his rookie campaign btw), first year starter. drafted in the 2nd round. The other was Chris Canty, who was a 4th round pick and joined their team in 09.

and you remember this link, http://footballoutsiders.com/stats/dl you posted for everyone to see? Well according to it the Giants gave up 4.3 ypc up the middle (26th overall) vs us at 4.51ypc (31st overall).

So the defensive lineman they carried over from their 08 superbowl roster and 2012 superbowl roster were Tuck(DE),Umenyiora(DE),Kiawanuka)(DE).Strahan(DE) was a part of that team as well and was replaced by Pierre Paul(DE) on this years roster.

Not a single DT played on both teams!

If you want to be like the Giants, get at least 3 good/great DE'S every year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I pointed out those 2 old dudes in 09 to show you that dt's are not the mvp's of the defense or even the defensive line. You cited that you want a line like the Giants have because "they have been a dominant line for years" and I am inclined to agree with you there.Where we disagree is why they are dominant.

Their starting DT'S this year were Linval Joseph:2nd year player(much improved from his rookie campaign btw), first year starter. drafted in the 2nd round. The other was Chris Canty, who was a 4th round pick and joined their team in 09.

and you remember this link, http://footballoutsiders.com/stats/dl you posted for everyone to see? Well according to it the Giants gave up 4.3 ypc up the middle (26th overall) vs us at 4.51ypc (31st overall).

So the defensive lineman they carried over from their 08 superbowl roster and 2012 superbowl roster were Tuck(DE),Umenyiora(DE),Kiawanuka)(DE).Strahan(DE) was a part of that team as well and was replaced by Pierre Paul(DE) on this years roster.

Not a single DT played on both teams!

If you want to be like the Giants, get at least 3 good/great DE'S every year.

This is exactly what I'm talking about. U don't have to have an all pro dt. Just need a average player. If u have studs on the outside then it will work out. We wouldnt have the same talent as the giants would have but we would have 3 pretty solid de. And Charles Johnson is gonne explode this year. And I think hardy played really well. Add coples to the mix or maybe even Ingram from USC and it would be a pretty stout line even with an aging dt in Edwards and 2 rooks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is exactly what I'm talking about. U don't have to have an all pro dt. Just need a average player. If u have studs on the outside then it will work out. We wouldnt have the same talent as the giants would have but we would have 3 pretty solid de. And Charles Johnson is gonne explode this year. And I think hardy played really well. Add coples to the mix or maybe even Ingram from USC and it would be a pretty stout line even with an aging dt in Edwards and 2 rooks

Exactly!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys are way downplaying the quality of the Giants DT's. Tuck was not always a DE, he was the starting DT the 1st time they won a superbowl and he was a BEAST. He played plenty of DT this year too as part of a rotation. Canty was also extremely good in the superbowl. Pass rushing DT's are very important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys are way downplaying the quality of the Giants DT's. Tuck was not always a DE, he was the starting DT the 1st time they won a superbowl and he was a BEAST. He played plenty of DT this year too as part of a rotation. Canty was also extremely good in the superbowl. Pass rushing DT's are very important.

Coples can play the same role that Tuck played, lining up at DT and DE depending on down and distance. Coples has the strength to play DT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coples can play the same role that Tuck played, lining up at DT and DE depending on down and distance. Coples has the strength to play DT.

Yep I completely agree. This was the sort of thing I was alluding to in my Coples thread. I do think he's the next Justin Tuck. People have a fair point about his effort though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regardless about Coples specifics, he fits a perfect need for the Jags and I don't see why they wouldn't either go with him on the line or a potential elite wide-out.

Blackmon will be gone by that pick and there's no way in hell they're reaching for Jeffery or Floyd. They're trying to hit refresh this season with a new owner, uniforms, identity, and overall trying to sell tickets...they're gonna be wanting a potential playmaker. I just don't think Coples makes it to us if we're talking about where the prospects stand as of today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
    • He is a talented player with a lot of potential but ultimately he is a legend in his own mind and the minds of those who attack on his behalf when people pinpoint inconvenient truths. I could see people being so hostile over him if he actually had that kind of juice but he doesn't. Even in the Heat win LaMelo took 31 shots and was 40%. If not for Coby White's late heroics we would have lost in regulation. The reality is we do have pieces in place to compete in the playoffs but in year 6 and with a supermax and a salary that is only going to increase over the next few years LaMelo Ball simply does not look like a franchise centerpiece that you can go on multiple playoff runs with. Look at someone like Trae Young. His team moved on. And he actually took them to the conference finals. The Hornets are at a crossroads. Very tough conversations need to be had in the offseason.
×
×
  • Create New...