Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rotoworld belives Brian Quick is top 50 talent

Ja Rhule

By Ja Rhule,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Ja Rhule Grand Master

Ja Rhule

Posted
Posted

Appalachian State WR Brian Quick's two unofficial forty-yard dash times at the Combine were 4.48 and 4.53.

Quick isn't Stephen Hill, but he's got impressive speed for a 6-foot-3 1/2 and 220-pound wide receiver. While some draftniks believe he'll be a mid- to late-round pick, the NFL is higher on Quick than the media. He has a legitimate shot to go in the top 50, and today's performance will help his cause.

They also believe Streeter is extremely raw.

Miami (FL) WR Tommy Streeter ran unofficial forty-yard dash times of 4.34 and 4.38 at the NFL Combine.

At 6-foot-5, 219, he's a freak of nature. Streeter will particularly appeal to NFL teams that upgrade prospects for workout numbers. (And there are plenty of them, even in the post-Al Davis era.) In terms of production, Streeter was less impressive in college. His only big year came as a junior (2011), when Streeter caught 46 balls for 811 yards. He's a project.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jungleking Newbie

jungleking

Posted
Posted

Quick in the second? No. He's a guy who produced against bad compeitition. Streeter? Eh. Didn't produce against good competition, but he's tall and fast and could fit our system. Hill's the same. Basically, they should be on the draft board, but there should be a lot of guys in front of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cbarrier90 Newbie

cbarrier90

Posted
Posted

Quick in the second? No. He's a guy who produced against bad compeitition. Streeter? Eh. Didn't produce against good competition, but he's tall and fast and could fit our system. Hill's the same. Basically, they should be on the draft board, but there should be a lot of guys in front of them.

..............What? :confused5:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MtnJax Rising Star

MtnJax

Posted
Posted

Quick in the second? No. He's a guy who produced against bad compeitition. Streeter? Eh. Didn't produce against good competition, but he's tall and fast and could fit our system. Hill's the same. Basically, they should be on the draft board, but there should be a lot of guys in front of them.

2 TDs against VaTech is bad competition?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jungleking Newbie

jungleking

Posted
Posted

2 TDs against VaTech is bad competition?

Grrr...looked at his stats on ESPN and saw one catch for eight yards against the only major team they played. Too bad I didn't realize that they stopped counting App State's players' stats after 2008.

Let's chalk this one up to carelessness. I'll do a little more homework on him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Didn’t watch today but….

      By CRA · Posted

      31st rushing D and 8 carries by Rico is coaching.  Rico is easily the best offensive weapon right now and it’s not really close.  *literally everyone knows Dalton is washed, horrible and shouldn’t even be a backup QB.   Drive 1? ZERO carries.  Coaching.  Drive 2 - Rico was playing great.   Did Canales lean into that or go for “balance”? Coaching. Drive 3 - ZERO carries.  Coaching  Drive 4 - 1 carry and opted for Jimmy Horn gadget rush (you can’t stick  with the Horn repetitive gadget runs each week and that’s not a better idea than getting Rico going)  Drive 5 - basically Dalton heavy as the half expired.  I don’t need to watch a game to know it’s coaching.  The gameplan wasn’t about setting Rico up to go off on a trash rush D.  It was bullshit harmony balance of the rush and the pass and making Hubbard feel good.
    • Lurk21
      Dude come on

      By Lurk21 · Posted

      In the locker room after the Dallas game, multiple  players said FEED him when Canales mentioned Rico stats. That already made me think even the locker room wouldn't care if Rico got the touches rn. This is on Canales indeed and I agree n the Qb take.  We aren't winning  bc of Bryce  but he has been managing it. Had the Jets had Qb aptitude,  we could've probably  lost that game too. All they would've needed is 14 points. Regardless, we got a team  that's being built up and that position needs an overhaul. 
    • ForJimmy
      Dude come on

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      I think he was trying to mimic the Lions with Montgomery and Gibbs. They are just more of the exception to the rule and Brooks was too much of a gamble to be a Gibbs type player. The Lions also didn’t sign Montgomery and draft Gibbs until their offense was nearly set. It was more of a luxury take the offense to the next level type of deal. 
×
×
  • Create New...