Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jacksonville pick


stirs

Recommended Posts

This pick could set up the Panthers for a trade down. If they take Coples rather than Ingram, then the Bills will set their sights on Ingram without a doubt.

Ingram had a great season and a great combine. He will be coveted by teams in the 3-4 and the Panthers will be the trade partner they look to for a trade just ahead of Buffalo.

Arizona would be smart to replace the 12 vet Haggans with this young future pro bowler. Panthers would pick up a third in the deal. Doubt Dallas would move up unless Spencer is not the man for them.

San Diego does not normally move up and they need all their picks this time.

Jets I doubt would come up for him.

anyway, you get the picture. Usually, the best 3-4 OLB in any draft gets a lot of attention

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Jaguars are such a wild card team. There draft strategy may be a dartboard. They need tackle, wr, qb, de, and corner. Also who is gonna trade up for Ingram? Sorry don't see that happening. With all the other guys available moving up is silly. I rate Ingram as a mid 1st rounder. So 16-20 is good value. He is a reach anytime before. Also he is a scheme conversion project that is risky. Would rather have Shae McCullen out of Boise State or Ronnell Lewis if i was looking for 3-4 OLB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Jaguars are such a wild card team. There draft strategy may be a dartboard. They need tackle, wr, qb, de, and corner. Also who is gonna trade up for Ingram? Sorry don't see that happening. With all the other guys available moving up is silly. I rate Ingram as a mid 1st rounder. So 16-20 is good value. He is a reach anytime before. Also he is a scheme conversion project that is risky. Would rather have Shae McCullen out of Boise State or Ronnell Lewis if i was looking for 3-4 OLB.

NFLN guys have Ingram going to Jacksonville at 7 so I think the 20 spot is now more fluid than before the combine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course the NFLN guys should check here before doing any sort of mocks. The huddle obviously has better info than those guys.

We all do mocks, mocks, I say. Nobody will get it correct, but, some guys go up boards and some come down. All I am saying is the guys like Poe and Ingram have helped themselves since the combine. If you think they still belong in the bottom of the first, then maybe you guys should sign on at the NFLN or ESPN or somewhere because the football world will be much better knowing where the huddle guys stand

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course the NFLN guys should check here before doing any sort of mocks. The huddle obviously has better info than those guys.

We all do mocks, mocks, I say. Nobody will get it correct, but, some guys go up boards and some come down. All I am saying is the guys like Poe and Ingram have helped themselves since the combine. If you think they still belong in the bottom of the first, then maybe you guys should sign on at the NFLN or ESPN or somewhere because the football world will be much better knowing where the huddle guys stand

Finally, someone sees the talent! Thank God. :iagree:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course the NFLN guys should check here before doing any sort of mocks. The huddle obviously has better info than those guys.

We all do mocks, mocks, I say. Nobody will get it correct, but, some guys go up boards and some come down. All I am saying is the guys like Poe and Ingram have helped themselves since the combine. If you think they still belong in the bottom of the first, then maybe you guys should sign on at the NFLN or ESPN or somewhere because the football world will be much better knowing where the huddle guys stand

I mock those doing mocks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The reset worked with proton.me.. wouldn’t work with my Gmail, Yahoo or Verizon email accounts 
    • Wish they started at 5:30 or 6 at the latest so I can watch it. I have to be in bed by start time.
    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
×
×
  • Create New...