Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jaguars looking to trade down


jtnc

Recommended Posts

After the Rams got a king’s ransom from the Redskins for the right to draft Robert Griffin III, the Jaguars want the rest of the league to know that they’re open to trading their own first-round pick to any team interested in Texas A&M’s Ryan Tannehill.

Jaguars G.M. Gene Smith said today that the potential interest in Tannehill could lead to a trade at No. 7, according to John Oehser of Jaguars.com.

However, teams that are interested in Tannehill may have to trade up higher than No. 7 to get him. As Peter King noted today, drafting Tannehill may require trading all the way up into the Top 4.

In fact, if it becomes apparent that the Browns are interested in drafting Tannehill at No. 4 overall, it’s even conceivable that some team could trade all the way up to No. 3 to take him before Cleveland can. With Andrew Luck surely going first overall to the Colts and Griffin surely going second to the Redskins, trading up to No. 3 would be the only way for a team that loves all three of the top quarterbacks in the draft to ensure it can select Tannehill.

Forget about the Jaguars at No. 7. The team that has to love the talk about Tannehill’s stock rising is Minnesota, which is now in the driver’s seat in the first round.

It may turn out in six weeks that NFL teams don’t covet Tannehill quite that much, and he’ll still be available several picks into the first round of the draft. But if the Dolphins were counting on a fallback plan at quarterback of drafting Tannehill with the eighth overall pick, then they’d better make sure they sign Peyton Manning or Matt Flynn.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/15/as-tannehills-stock-rises-jaguars-would-like-to-trade-down/

If they get a trade suitor, this definitely decreases our chances of trade or the other two teams left in the top 10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeez...so much for ole Gabbert :cam:
they aren't saying they want tannehill. they are saying that they are more than open to trading with any player wanting to trade up for tannehill.

if they pull this off then it just increases our chances of getting claiborne.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think he's gone, and rightfully so, if he turns in another losing record. The "talented roster," regardless of how true or not, is a double-edged sword. If the roster is so much improved now from 202X then why are you still producing losing seasons? On one hand, maybe that's what needs to happen. Have the GM hire the new coach, and then have the new coach pick his guy to run his system. That is typically how it works in the NFL. Not the forced inheritance deal we have had in place.
    • Hinging on Brooks to be our spark...be good if it happens... but not holding my breath....RB next draft. Morgan gambled...it would be a 2 year payoff if thing happened.
    • Only way Canales is fired is if we are attrocious everywhere....  defense /special teams and offense..  There are enough "questions" on if BY9 is the guy that ownership wouldn't fire the coach for "just" mid qb play.  Especially with as talented a roster that has played "well enough" to win some tough football games and hang in there against the top tier of the NFL ...(mostly).   Now total team suckage..yeah .. but I don't see that happening.   
×
×
  • Create New...