Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

In The First Round, The Panthers Select....

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted

I'm going after a first round talent at DT, yes other players on the roster may have the size but did not have 1st round type of talent. That's why they were undrafted.

People say Brockers is raw and we'd have to wait but such a large guy with abnormally long arms could contribute tomorrow. He has the physical tools that none of our 3rd rounders from last year could match plus much much more upside.

I haven't changed my stance, yes, Brockers!

Plus he can block kicks! Yes

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Krucid Newbie

Krucid

Posted
Posted

I'm going after a first round talent at DT, yes other players on the roster may have the size but did not have 1st round type of talent. That's why they were undrafted.

People say Brockers is raw and we'd have to wait but such a large guy with abnormally long arms could contribute tomorrow. He has the physical tools that none of our 3rd rounders from last year could match plus much much more upside.

I haven't changed my stance, yes, Brockers!

Plus he can block kicks! Yes

No doubt he will be good, but I dunno about taking him at 9. We have a really bad spot in this draft, talent falls off after the first 5-6 picks imo. Wish we could slide back to the mid teens and grab an extra 2nd or 3rd.

Alot of these picks would feel more worth it I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted

Anyone thinking we are going to take DT or DE in this draft are just brain dead retards. Hurney is not going to give up on Fun or

McClain after one year and he is not going to give up on Hardy after 2.

In this draft its either LB or CB in the first. I'm hoping CB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frash.exe Apprentice

frash.exe

Posted
Posted

i love the arguments against drafting one of the top DTs this year

on Poe: Dude he's just a workout warrior, he had a great combine, so what?

on Brockers: Dude his combine #s are terrible, we shouldn't draft him because he's too slow to play DT with a 5.36 40 yard dash

Link to comment
Share on other sites
davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
Posted

i love the arguments against drafting one of the top DTs this year

on Poe: Dude he's just a workout warrior, he had a great combine, so what?

on Brockers: Dude his combine #s are terrible, we shouldn't draft him because he's too slow to play DT with a 5.36 40 yard dash

Its just types. Types brooooooooooooooooo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DaveThePanther2008
      Panthers OLB Pat Jones II makes bold claim about team's defense

      By DaveThePanther2008 · Posted

      It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Canes vs Panthers Rd 3 Gm3 8pm

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...