Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Still worried about our run defense...


Zod

Recommended Posts

I don't think the NYG game is the best example for our run defense last year. Kemo is a Big part of what our run defense was, and wasn't for that matter in that game last year.

Despite what many think of him....Brayton was pretty solid against the run. Lewis was the only weak point against the run on our starting O-Line.

I expect Brown to start the year behind brayton on situational downs.

Starting d-line: Peppers, Lewis, Kemo, Brayton

Passing down d-line: Peppers, Lewis, Johnson, Brown

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not worried about our run defense this year, IF...

- we draft a couple of good DTs (one good every down player and one NT type)

- Meeks uses Chris Harris the way he used Bob Sanders

- Harris stays healthy more consistently than Sanders has

- the offense continues playing the way they did last year

That last one is key. The Colt defense under Meeks was quite often able to simply pin their ears back and rush the passer because the offense forced other teams to play from behind. Although the profile of our offense is quite different (run heavy rather than built around the QB) the potential is still there.

Add in that our defense, even without new guys, is heavier in the middle than the Colts D ever was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you put these in perspective, our run defense last year had some pretty good games against some very tough opponents during the first half of the season. Perhaps it's naive on my part, but I attribute a good part of the break down to the people on the sidelines. With the moves that have been made, thus far, on our D, I am thinking that we are going to be a team that produces a little controlled chaos, and gets after the ball.

I think that as long as the DC emphasizes being smart, such as being keenly aware of the angles and not over pursuing, then there is no way we will be pushed around like we were against the Giants. Half of the battle is just getting guys that have the talent and motor to get after it, and an analytical approach to defense. I am thinking that Brown is this kind of guy, and we will be looking to add a DT in that same vein.

Brown is a little undersized, but has the strength of a guy larger than his size, and expect that his play will be larger than many of you think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...