Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

My 2 Cents On Coples


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

Great against the pass. He moves double teams backwards and puts constant pressure on QB. He reminds a lot of little bit leaner Fletcher Cox.

Terrible against the run. He puts so much effort on getting after QB that he creates massive holes for RB to run through. Terrible sideline to sideline speed. He will not chase anyone from behind.

He fits Carolina scheme perfectly. He will create massive holes for our LBs to blitz through. He will be a difference maker on passing downs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Coples is top 10 pick. He's very raw. He make's many mental errors but he's very talented. He's 15-25 pick but not top 10. I trust Hurney tho.

Screw Hurney...I trust RIVERIA.....If he thinks Coples is worth the pick then dammit he worth the pick...Its no way he would let Hurney just pick what Defensive player he wanted to pick without his input....Riveria hasn't had 2 teams with #1 defenses for nothing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do people not see what I see when watching tape on Coples? It's not the flashy highlights, it's how well a player handles the guy across from him, double teams and his presence forcing teams to run to the other side of the field. If Rivera believes in Coples enough to draft him then I already feel sorry for opposing offenses. Rivera knows his stuff better than anyone on this board and if I had to bet, Coples or Cox will be the pick.

2785.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My 2 Cents:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_attribution_error

If it weren't for his sub-par senior season, which raised questions about his work ethic and desire, Coples would be a slam dunk. So the question is, was his performance the result of inherent personality traits or the circumstances at UNC? I believe that's what the front office is trying to figure out by visiting his home, and if they are convinced it has more to do with circumstance, they'll draft him.

I think investigating Cam taught the FO a lot about how to look for character in men and ignore the media speculation, so if they are comfortable, so am I.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm honestly looking beyond DC at this point. He's too green and is making too many simple mistakes. I think he's gone after next year. I think the intention in LV was to use Mayer and Bowers similar to Gronk/Hernandez in NE. That's never really struck me as Carroll's MO though after watching him for years out here in Seattle.  He's talented enough and I think he just got lost behind the phenom that is Bowers because he couldn't develop in Carroll's system. I'm surprised Bowers is used as much as he is, though they really don't have anyone else. TE's don't really exist as focus receivers in Carroll's offense. I live in the PNW so I've been subjected to a lot of Seahawks football.  Coaches other utilize their TEs. We should too. Tremble is OK, but he's always been a project as a receiver. Again, all this is of we could get him at the right price. I wouldn't pay a lot because we need to spend on defense. 
    • David. Hey, money talks.....it has been acknowledged that Tepper isn't shy on spending. He's had the NFL equivalents of used car salesman after used car salesman line up to grift him of a big chunk. Canales is one of them.  Until that changes, it's gonna be tough to build anything to last.
    • Well it's who they tied themselves to for at least another year but i agree. They will be lucky to find a useful contributor but until I see the DC situation change I am presuming it's SSDD. Well it sounds like maybe in 2027. 
×
×
  • Create New...