Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why Do We Have So Many Wrs And Tes On Our Roster?


jarhead

Recommended Posts

Competition I would think. Don't get me wrong, but Gettis isn't a for sure option. So far just Smith and LaFell are the only WR's we know for sure how can bring something to the table. Packers are ready to keep 6 WR on the roster.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/30/mike-mccarthy-suggests-packers-could-keep-six-receivers/

“The way we play, you could make a legitimate argument for six receivers … Our roster will be challenged as far as six receivers.

So Im thinking we want to carry about the same, especially since we wanna get more WR's involved taking shots downfield. So we let Naanne go, so that opens up an extra potential spot. We have Smith, LaFell, Gettis, Adams and Pilares, the last are mainly ST, so Im thinking we trying to find a diamond in the rough, and also be able to retain some practice squad guys, in case of injuries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not unusual to see a lot of receivers going to camp.

Between routes, drills, special teams work and other things, these guys do a lot of running.

Plus sometimes they just need extra guys for quarterback drills, preseason play and other things. Sometimes they'd prefer to just rest the starters and let the scrubs do that stuff.

Granted there could be deeper reasons, but it doesn't necessarily mean anything by itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To start with, you wouldn’t want to count up that value chart. You would see quickly where that is headed. But you basically did a quantity comparison, while ignoring quality.  I am looking at 2023 as the start, because it became all about Bryce.  2023 you have 4 picks plus DJ Moore for offense vs 2 (80 and 145) for defense.  2024 you got the 1st overall, the 32, the 46 and the 101 for offense vs 72, 157, 200 and 240 for defense. Leave the FA IOL out of it. Which was a crazy big  investment. But it wasn’t draft.  Anyway, that is basically 4 top 100 picks for offense and 4 picks for defense in 2024. Except they were 2 first rounders, the second rounder, and the 4th was really high at 101. Vs 72 and day three stuff. Please….  Second quoted/bolded… See you think we hate Bryce. That isn’t it at all. It is nice easy way to characterize us and discredit our talking points though.   Me, I do mostly hate watching him play. But I don’t hate the person. I hate the hell out of the stanning.  It started with the very first question I asked about his footwork, arm strength, and size. Height being the principle objection. I never even got to the durability factor. There was plenty without factoring that in.  But there was rabid opposition to even asking the question of what a couple of small fractions of a second extra closing time would do for the defenders.  What the extra time it takes to flip the hips would do vs a pass rush or on the other end after the ball is in the air. Split second more for recognition where it is going for the DBs.  The tippy toe backpedal.  That poo was a mess and it has always been mess but no Bryce fan wanted to hear it. “Go get another team to root for”. “It worked in the SEC it will be fine in the NFL you don’t know football you are just a hater”.  It got worse when the real games started. It has never stopped. It is nice that many people have left that train so there is less abuse but it hasn’t stopped.  So whatever… 
    • Whatever school you attended, I don't know and I don't care, but I would suggest demanding a refund.    Something was completely missed there.
    • The draft capital since since 2023 has in no way been pretty even.  Especially when you zero in on day 1 and day 2 draft picks.  Draft capital has vastly gone toward the O over D.  
×
×
  • Create New...